E63 Renntech vs MHP data
Jangy - as far as your comment regarding the MHP gaining nothing - well, you are simply showing your ignorance. First becasue most of the gains were under the curve, where it really matters. Second, becasue it seems now the MHP ECU tune was not even loaded and the TCU tune alone beat the previous Renntech dyno !!!! LOL - you are lost bro.
I would be greatly surprised if you acted the same way you do on the net in person, if so I'm sure we'll get along famously in a week and a half.
I'd say that was a smart choice. Andy is much better at rationalizing anyday.
...all I know is what he has told me privately.
My point, exactly.
Jangy - as far as your comment regarding the MHP gaining nothing - well, you are simply showing your ignorance.
Mine? Are you sure? It is a mighty slippery slope on which you tread.
First becasue most of the gains were under the curve, where it really matters.
Again, that is noise. Would you jump off a bridge if he said he modded your shoes? There were no gains!! It was all RENNTECH!
Second, becasue it seems now the MHP ECU tune was not even loaded and the TCU tune alone beat the previous Renntech dyno !!!! LOL - you are lost bro.
To be clear
Fact: All HP numbers are derived from TQ numbers.
Fact: Andy has stated that the dyno would not show his gains.
Fact: Andy claimed TQ gains from TCU gains alone (since ECU did not take).
My simple question is this. IF MHP is removing TQ limiting obstacles that reside in the TCU (as claimed in prior threads), why would the removal NOT be seen on a dyno? If that was a misunderstanding and it is seen on a dyno, then why are there NO power gains associated with the delimiting? You take the governor off a lawnmower and it doesn't just have more grunt. It runs stronger!!

Andy - if that is in fact the case, that's pretty impressive and would explain the torque gains. However, I'm interested to hear your thoughts about just exactly which ECU tune was dynoed if yours didn't load - had to be the previously loaded Renntech file, right ??






Seriously, I just don't get how you can get things so twisted in that little head of yours. Jeff already has a TCU from us, which is why his shifting is so improved (again read his comments, jrcarts, vadert's, tuningtech's etc. for more TCU commentary) his ECU flash didn't take.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
It has been discussed before that the TCU stays in the car. The ECU is removed and then flashed - Jeff just said the ECU is takes 2 seperate flashes. One for the ECU tuning itself and one for the TCU. Of course, once the ECU is reinstalled it then communicates with the TCU and changes how it operates. What, did you think the TCU was flashed by osmosis ???








...and for the record, I still don't feel the need to prove anything to you.
TCU mods for a 63 entail line pressure changes, stall speed changes, Torque management elimination/reduction, shift quickness/firmness, heightened throttle response, etc. There are quite a few variables we manipulate.
I'd better stop, my post count is going up...
Just keep ignoring the data/results and concentrate on getting your car back together and running as it should.






WOW, a WHOPPING 1% increase with your mod. Let me remember that one. It is noise, Andy. That low of gains from a straight mod is shameful. At least before, you claimed that the benefits of the TCU couldn't be seen by dyno and that you were able to match or slightly beat RT's ECU tune. Now, you say that those "gains" are from a mod that costs money? So, are you saying that this is the first time you ever modded just TCU in a 63?
Jeff, jrcarts, vadert's, tuningtech's etc. for more TCU commentary.
That's it? Only your homeys? Why not some feedback from a MEMBER here that is believed?
If you want commentary about my tunes, please contact my father, mother, brother, sister, etc.







...and for the record, I still don't feel the need to prove anything to you.








...and for the record, I still don't feel the need to prove anything to you.

Tom

Just keep ignoring the data/results and concentrate on getting your car back together and running as it should.
Show you? I'm sensing a little hostility, but I'll let it pass since I'm not looking for a fight. I only meant that I thought you actually flash the TCU directly.
ps--we severely reduce adaptive learning, to the point it's nearly irrelevant.
No flames intended, but clarification would be nice. Before, the TCU had to be physically flashed (via new unit or sending in your factory one), now it is all done through the ECU? Please detail the process for each car or tranny.
As for the quoted post above, do you have any idea how many other vendors with 63 tuning of their own called me out on that? LOL, exactly Zero.
Members/customers that PM'd me for more info on our 63 tuning back then were told about the ECU doing everything.
It's a shady business, we knew that coming in, and we still underestimated what some will do in an attempt to copy our tuning.
This is actually a pretty good question. Why did the A/F ratio change if the MHP ECU flash didn't take?
Tom



