Gt 55 vs Gt 63 2024




The interesting development was the flat-plane M178 version for the GT Black Series and now the supposed flat-plane version of the M177 they are working on to be unveiled in the CLE 63. But the current GT 63 has the proven existing M177 that we already know and love, but not even at its highest power level. No longer the M178 as the previous GT, which is the dry-sump version of the M177 as you probably know.
Last edited by superswiss; May 29, 2025 at 01:01 AM.
There obviously is fine print that if your car were to have failures as a direct result of the tune, then it voids warranty. But from my research so far and conversations with others they’ve told me the stage 1 figures are more than safe.
renntech stage 1 for the GT55 is for around $3200USD. Plus 1k or so for installation if you get it done from a reputable shop. That’s about 4k-ish.
There obviously is fine print that if your car were to have failures as a direct result of the tune, then it voids warranty. But from my research so far and conversations with others they’ve told me the stage 1 figures are more than safe.
renntech stage 1 for the GT55 is for around $3200USD. Plus 1k or so for installation if you get it done from a reputable shop. That’s about 4k-ish.
https://www.renntechmercedes.com/ind...-192-55-detail
There obviously is fine print that if your car were to have failures as a direct result of the tune, then it voids warranty. But from my research so far and conversations with others they’ve told me the stage 1 figures are more than safe.
renntech stage 1 for the GT55 is for around $3200USD. Plus 1k or so for installation if you get it done from a reputable shop. That’s about 4k-ish.




just an fyi ...
Ironically, the spec I liked more was in the 55 but the dealer said his deal was on the 63 which I took.
This 55 has the said Renntech tune box and I did recently post this too- its situational but it does show how the factory tune has a better higher rpm sweet spot that of a piggy and it also shows that AMG probably underrates their engines (probably in both cases). Of course this is a point in time run with **** conditions so both cars probably had some spin.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
The interesting development was the flat-plane M178 version for the GT Black Series and now the supposed flat-plane version of the M177 they are working on to be unveiled in the CLE 63. But the current GT 63 has the proven existing M177 that we already know and love, but not even at its highest power level. No longer the M178 as the previous GT, which is the dry-sump version of the M177 as you probably know.
just an fyi ...
Ironically, the spec I liked more was in the 55 but the dealer said his deal was on the 63 which I took.
This 55 has the said Renntech tune box and I did recently post this too- its situational but it does show how the factory tune has a better higher rpm sweet spot that of a piggy and it also shows that AMG probably underrates their engines (probably in both cases). Of course this is a point in time run with **** conditions so both cars probably had some spin.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sCxgtuQQy-8
just an fyi ...
Ironically, the spec I liked more was in the 55 but the dealer said his deal was on the 63 which I took.
This 55 has the said Renntech tune box and I did recently post this too- its situational but it does show how the factory tune has a better higher rpm sweet spot that of a piggy and it also shows that AMG probably underrates their engines (probably in both cases). Of course this is a point in time run with **** conditions so both cars probably had some spin.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sCxgtuQQy-8
Yeah, I know it’s a piggyback module, which is actually what made it so interesting to me that it’s easily reversible back to stock.
The tuned 55 has a wild jump off the line, but at higher speeds and RPMs, you can definitely see the 63 for what it is. I was in a similar situation as you, really wanted the 63, but the 55 had the exact spec I was looking for. After comparing costs, I decided to save the $30K since the performance difference (with or even without a tune) just didn’t justify the price for me personally. Mind you I don't track cars at all, so I will rarely if at all be using the car to its absolute potential.
Yeah, I know it’s a piggyback module, which is actually what made it so interesting to me that it’s easily reversible back to stock.
The tuned 55 has a wild jump off the line, but at higher speeds and RPMs, you can definitely see the 63 for what it is. I was in a similar situation as you, really wanted the 63, but the 55 had the exact spec I was looking for. After comparing costs, I decided to save the $30K since the performance difference (with or even without a tune) just didn’t justify the price for me personally. Mind you I don't track cars at all, so I will rarely if at all be using the car to its absolute potential.
I was looking at a '24 GT63 alpine grey exterior, red pepper interior, no aero kit, dealer-used with around 800 km. Instead, I went with the '25 GT55 in matte white, white interior, and an aero kit with zero km, for about a $27K difference all in.
Had the GT55 not been a not commonly ordered spec, 1 year newer and fully loaded I without question would've gone for a 63.
I was looking at a '24 GT63 alpine grey exterior, red pepper interior, no aero kit, dealer-used with around 800 km. Instead, I went with the '25 GT55 in matte white, white interior, and an aero kit with zero km, for about a $27K difference all in.
Had the GT55 not been a not commonly ordered spec, 1 year newer and fully loaded I without question would've gone for a 63.








Yeah, I know it’s a piggyback module, which is actually what made it so interesting to me that it’s easily reversible back to stock.
The tuned 55 has a wild jump off the line, but at higher speeds and RPMs, you can definitely see the 63 for what it is. I was in a similar situation as you, really wanted the 63, but the 55 had the exact spec I was looking for. After comparing costs, I decided to save the $30K since the performance difference (with or even without a tune) just didn’t justify the price for me personally. Mind you I don't track cars at all, so I will rarely if at all be using the car to its absolute potential.
They claim 60whp/55tq gains but at the wheels so its more if you adjust to crank like RT does. Its fine for me and now my 63 has the juice!!
https://www.racechip.us/shop/mercede...hoC9IYQAvD_BwE
They claim 60whp/55tq gains but at the wheels so its more if you adjust to crank like RT does. Its fine for me and now my 63 has the juice!!
https://www.racechip.us/shop/mercede...hoC9IYQAvD_BwE




Its about informing and clearly we know hardly anyone tunes their cars here which is respected of course.
Its about informing and clearly we know hardly anyone tunes their cars here which is respected of course.
The interesting development was the flat-plane M178 version for the GT Black Series and now the supposed flat-plane version of the M177 they are working on to be unveiled in the CLE 63. But the current GT 63 has the proven existing M177 that we already know and love, but not even at its highest power level. No longer the M178 as the previous GT, which is the dry-sump version of the M177 as you probably know.
For those of us trying to understand the price difference well here it is explained. I am a hp addict so the internals are very important when you plan on taking this platform to 900-1000hp
Last edited by Zmangt63; May 29, 2025 at 11:54 PM.
For those of us trying to understand the price difference well here it is explained. I am a hp addict so the internals are very important when you plan on taking this platform to 900-1000hp



