Why Buy a C250 over the C350

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 02-29-2012, 06:39 AM
  #51  
Super Moderator

 
Glyn M Ruck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 19,941
Received 177 Likes on 144 Posts
late 2009 CLK 350 Coupe Elegance, '65 Jaguar S Type wires
Originally Posted by K-A
I hate 4-Bangers and wouldn't want one in my Benz, but that's more of a sound/feel as well as prejudice against 4-cylinders thing. I personally would pick the 350 simply due to the engine sound, feel, refinement and dual exhaust much more than the extra power that I'd rarely tap into.
That's my personal stance! putting sensibilities aside. Afterall - I had a C240 before my present car - hardly a ball of fire but magic when revved. I like 6 cylinder engines. Don't mind small ones.

Last edited by Glyn M Ruck; 02-29-2012 at 06:43 AM.
Old 02-29-2012, 11:46 AM
  #52  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
MDMercedesGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Germantown, MD/Rehoboth Beach, DE
Posts: 1,351
Received 88 Likes on 60 Posts
2024 GLS450
Originally Posted by Kevin82
Yes I'm aware that just because you have the money it doesn't mean you have to spend it.

I was trying to make an exaggerated point to those posters that keep on insisting that c250 owners should of shelled out a few extra grand and get the c350.
Ahh - I got you now
Old 02-29-2012, 01:34 PM
  #53  
Super Member
 
DameMD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: GA
Posts: 690
Received 84 Likes on 64 Posts
X3 M40i
This thread makes no sense really...

I tried to avoid this thread but reading some of the comments makes me smh.

Why buy a c250 over a c350? Well why buy a S600 instead of a S65? Why buy a e350 instead of a e550 coupe? If I was buying an E class I would not buy an engine that is sitting in a c350, SLK350, GLK350...If I were to step up to an E class I would get a e550. V8-twin turbo..no brainer. The v8 is more refined then the v6. See what I am getting at? It's personal preference.

It's the same question that is being asked. It's all about personal preference. I didn't see any extra refinement in the c350 to warrant me shelling out extra cash for it. Engine refinement? Dual exhaust? It's the same damn car, besides engine and tailpipes. As some one posted, if you are doing a lot of city driving (me), I rarely go over 70mph in my car. I spend most of my time "IN" my car daily commuting, and correct me if I am wrong, if you sat in my "c250" and I sat in a "c350" I am going to really see a big difference right? LOL

Let's not forget with my "$179" JB+ tune (not $500 or $1000), I have the same amount of torque as a c350. Torque matters for me as I need the passing power and lane changing power to move around in DC traffic. The c250 taps into it's torque powerband a lot faster than a c350 considering the c250 get all its torque around 2000-4500 rpms (every magazine that has tested the c250 and c350 have verified this). I think that right there make a LOT of sense. Best bang-for-buck-gas saving-money-decision ever. smh
Old 02-29-2012, 09:10 PM
  #54  
Super Moderator

 
Glyn M Ruck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 19,941
Received 177 Likes on 144 Posts
late 2009 CLK 350 Coupe Elegance, '65 Jaguar S Type wires
As you say it's a matter of preference. To me the increase in refinement of a 6 is critical to my enjoyment of a Benz. To you it is not. There is also the question of longevity. Benz 6 cyl engines have a history of doing huge mileage.

It's like the new 328i Beemer. It's lost it's character without a 6 in it.
Old 02-29-2012, 09:44 PM
  #55  
K-A
Out Of Control!!
 
K-A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 10,557
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 18 Posts
Porsche Macan S SportDesign / Ex M-B's: 11 & 10 & 06 E350's, 02 S500
Yeah, I hate 4-Bangers. I rode in a C250 and even going through a parking lot, you can hear that distinct "4-Banger sound". To me, an M-B needs at least the refinement/sound of a 6.... but hey, some people feel that an M-B needs at least the refinement/sound of a V8.... then some a V12, lol. However, as far as usable real-world performance, I'm sure the 4-Banger Benz has enough of it realistically.
Old 02-29-2012, 10:27 PM
  #56  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
mis3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,200
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
2004 CLK320
Originally Posted by Glyn M Ruck
As you say it's a matter of preference. To me the increase in refinement of a 6 is critical to my enjoyment of a Benz. To you it is not. There is also the question of longevity. Benz 6 cyl engines have a history of doing huge mileage.
I appreciate the realibility and robustness of my M112 / 722.6, both are proven and well driven technologies. My car has 150K miles and it is running extremely well.

Not sure about these MB new DI engines, they are brand new engine designs that we will know the reliability of them only in a few more months.

Last edited by Glyn M Ruck; 03-01-2012 at 04:53 AM.
Old 02-29-2012, 11:12 PM
  #57  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
MDMercedesGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Germantown, MD/Rehoboth Beach, DE
Posts: 1,351
Received 88 Likes on 60 Posts
2024 GLS450
I'm of the "I won't own a V6" crowd. They just sound lumpy to me at low speeds, and at higher RPM larger V6 engines sound harsh. I prefer the purr of a 4 cylinder at low speeds and a throatier burble through the midrange.

The old 2.6 liter had a great sound when it was wound out - it's one of the few V6 engines I actually like.

A part of my lifetime love for MB died when they stopped using Inline-6 petrol engines.

I think one of the things I am going to miss most about my smart when it gets traded in a couple of weeks is how it sounds - shades of a 2.5 liter Boxster.
Old 03-01-2012, 04:52 AM
  #58  
Super Moderator

 
Glyn M Ruck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 19,941
Received 177 Likes on 144 Posts
late 2009 CLK 350 Coupe Elegance, '65 Jaguar S Type wires
Yeah! - I know what you like MDMG - I loved my old 280E Twincam W123. Magic engine. Benz says another inline 6 is in it's future.
Old 03-01-2012, 04:57 AM
  #59  
Super Moderator

 
Glyn M Ruck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 19,941
Received 177 Likes on 144 Posts
late 2009 CLK 350 Coupe Elegance, '65 Jaguar S Type wires
Originally Posted by mis3
I appreciate the realibility and robustness of my M112 / 722.6, both are proven and well driven technologies. My car has 150K miles and it is running extremely well.

Not sure about these MB new DI engines, they are brand new engine designs that we will know the reliability of them only in a few more months.
Yeah - I'm hoping the new engine continues the tradition. I must say it's beautifully executed compared with the Chrysler Pentastar 3.6 that shares the same DNA but not DI.
Old 03-01-2012, 12:26 PM
  #60  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
jctevere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Dix Hills, New York
Posts: 2,108
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
2012 C250 Coupe
I used to be part of the same crowd that "would never drive a 4-cylinder". But after now having my c250, I can honestly say, I was being ignorant before. The sound isn't NEARLY as bad as a civic or non-luxury 4-cylinder. You can tell its more refined. It sounds a bit deeper and "groggy" and not as annoying. The turbo also sounds really cool when you shift, blowing off.

So to be honest, having this first 4-cylinder I feel like has opened my eyes to alternative engine variants. My next time around I will probably look heavily into an diesel offerings...
Old 03-01-2012, 07:39 PM
  #61  
K-A
Out Of Control!!
 
K-A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 10,557
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 18 Posts
Porsche Macan S SportDesign / Ex M-B's: 11 & 10 & 06 E350's, 02 S500
Originally Posted by Glyn M Ruck
Yeah - I'm hoping the new engine continues the tradition. I must say it's beautifully executed compared with the Chrysler Pentastar 3.6 that shares the same DNA but not DI.
Are you speaking of the new Chrysler V6 and the new M-B D/I V6? I thought they seemed suspiciously similar, and their statistical figures are also about identical.
Old 03-02-2012, 02:40 AM
  #62  
Super Moderator

 
Glyn M Ruck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 19,941
Received 177 Likes on 144 Posts
late 2009 CLK 350 Coupe Elegance, '65 Jaguar S Type wires
Yes - The new Benz M278 3.5 DI V6 & the new Chrysler Pentastar 3.6 V6 were a joint development & share the same DNA.
Old 03-02-2012, 06:14 AM
  #63  
K-A
Out Of Control!!
 
K-A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 10,557
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 18 Posts
Porsche Macan S SportDesign / Ex M-B's: 11 & 10 & 06 E350's, 02 S500
Interesting, thanks. How about the previous 3.5L? Was that a joint development with Chrysler?
Old 03-02-2012, 02:35 PM
  #64  
Super Moderator

 
Glyn M Ruck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 19,941
Received 177 Likes on 144 Posts
late 2009 CLK 350 Coupe Elegance, '65 Jaguar S Type wires
No. The M272 that we have is all Benz.
Old 03-02-2012, 08:50 PM
  #65  
K-A
Out Of Control!!
 
K-A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 10,557
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 18 Posts
Porsche Macan S SportDesign / Ex M-B's: 11 & 10 & 06 E350's, 02 S500
Sweet.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Why Buy a C250 over the C350



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:34 PM.