87 O vs 93 O, 93 O wins.
Ive debated about putting the 91 O fuel in , but I fear anything less than whats called for (92) could jeopardize the engines long term performance?
I wonder how true that could be ... but then again with a car like this im not sure its worth chancing it.
I'd be interested to hear your results comparing 91 AKI and 93 AKI... Theoretically there shouldn't be any difference but I'd be interested to see if there were.
Ive debated about putting the 91 O fuel in , but I fear anything less than whats called for (92) could jeopardize the engines long term performance?
I wonder how true that could be ... but then again with a car like this im not sure its worth chancing it.
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
The C300 2.0L engine has a relatively high compression ratio of 9.8:1. The high compression of the motor requires the higher octane gas for it to function properly.
The use of lower octane gas will cause pinging, engine roughness, loss in performance, and potential irreversible damage.
The use of higher than recommend octane does nothing as well. Since the goal is to prevent the gas from igniting prematurely due to pressure, there is a perfect Octane rating to achieve that - and the car manufacturer has already figured that out for you. Using any Octane rating higher than that won't get you anything because the gas is already igniting at the optimal time.






