C-Class (W202) 1995-2000: C 200 CDI, C 220 CDI, C 270 CDI, C 180, C 200 K,C 230 K, C 220, C230, C 280

What's faster?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 03-27-2005 | 05:11 PM
  #1  
west86's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What's faster?

1999-2000 C230K, or 1999-2000 C280?

And what kind of acceleration can one expect from these?
Old 03-27-2005 | 06:01 PM
  #2  
C280Sportster's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Wash., D.C.
C280
Originally Posted by west86
1999-2000 C230K, or 1999-2000 C280?

And what kind of acceleration can one expect from these?
Not this again! JK. 0-60 in 7.5sec and 1/4 mile in 16.X (something).

It's a tough call. I think the C230k has the advantage (on paper) but real world results say it's a tie.

The C230K is cheaper to mod. Are you looking to buy one?
Old 03-27-2005 | 06:14 PM
  #3  
grkpmpn69's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2000 C280 Sport (W202)
The C230 is "faster" on paper like sportster said, and yes it is cheaper to mod...but when you mod a C280 you will get better hp & tq out of performance chips, pulley kits, exhaust etc...and i can say that i have raced against my buddys 2000 C230 completely stock, all i had done at the time was my powerchip and intake and i beat him by at at least a car length...tough call though, your choice

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: What's faster?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:18 PM.