C-Class (W203) 2001-2007, C160, C180, C200, C220, C230, C240, C270, C280, C300, C320, C230K, C350, Coupe

W203/CL203 TICKETED "for not having a front plate" Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 01-18-2006, 08:57 PM
  #101  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
mick1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2005 C320wz
Originally Posted by mctwin2kman
A lot of dealers have a policy to put it on if the car is sold in a state that requires a front plate. Why should the dealer be responsible for you breaking the law without the plate? If you do not like the rule then move to a state that does not have it. Sorry but the dealer is more in the right than you are since it is the law in CA to have a front plate.
I noticed that nearly all of the new MB cars at Smythe European (San Jose, CA) got the front plates but none of the new MB cars at Fletcher Jones (Fremont, CA) got them plates.

I had never paid attention about the front plate before but then before I ordered my car, I noticed that there were many cars on the road without them, so I decided to tell the dealer not to mount it.

Speaking about the law, CA law says 65 mph is the max. speed limit but if you drive on the freeway, you will see that practically nobody drives 65 mph.
Old 01-18-2006, 09:39 PM
  #102  
Super Member
 
PrsnBenz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: 925, CA
Posts: 627
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2006 E90 325i
Originally Posted by mick1
I noticed that nearly all of the new MB cars at Smythe European (San Jose, CA) got the front plates but none of the new MB cars at Fletcher Jones (Fremont, CA) got them plates.

I had never paid attention about the front plate before but then before I ordered my car, I noticed that there were many cars on the road without them, so I decided to tell the dealer not to mount it.

Speaking about the law, CA law says 65 mph is the max. speed limit but if you drive on the freeway, you will see that practically nobody drives 65 mph.

yeah my car didnt come with it either without us saying anything and thank god they didnt. they did however on my dads car and i give him crap for it but hes an old man so he doesnt care.

i personally think it should be the customers choice, its their responsibility whether or not to put it there and its our own fault if we get a ticket. id brush it off but i havent gotten cited for it yet.

oh and btw mick, when did the fremont dealership become fletcher jones???? i dont know if thats a good or bad thing but most people associate fletcher jones with the newport beach dealership, where i got my car. ewwwwww that sucks lol.
Old 01-18-2006, 10:12 PM
  #103  
Member
 
SwedeMercedes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2006 MB C230, Black on Black
Where do you get the bumper plugs?

I just took delivery 3 weeks ago and told them directly NOT to install my front bracket, sure enough they did anyway. So I will go with the plugs, I will not put the front plate on unless I absolutely have to.

Where do you get the bumper plugs?

Thanks.

"All is fair in love and war"
Old 01-18-2006, 10:17 PM
  #104  
ON PROBATION
 
ClayJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 5,024
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Listed a few times at the bottom of the this thread - bumperplugs.com
Old 01-18-2006, 10:19 PM
  #105  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
mick1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2005 C320wz
Originally Posted by PrsnBenz
oh and btw mick, when did the fremont dealership become fletcher jones???? i dont know if thats a good or bad thing but most people associate fletcher jones with the newport beach dealership, where i got my car. ewwwwww that sucks lol.
very recently. only about 3 or 4 months ago, i think. I work close to there so I would walk pass that dealer every day in my lunch time walk
Old 01-18-2006, 10:53 PM
  #106  
MBworld Guru
 
FrankW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Diamond Bar, CA
Posts: 22,007
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
white and whiter
no matter what you do the dealership is not going to give you another bumper. At most they are gonna give you the same thing Kenzbenz got.

Mine didn't came with the plate bracket and I only told my sales once, but in the end I put on the Euro plate anyway. lol
Old 01-19-2006, 01:39 AM
  #107  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
white_w203's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: East Bay, CA
Posts: 2,006
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
is SOLD
i would personally talk to the general sales manager not to drill holes. if they have a class action suit then just recommend to sign a waiver or whatever it takes not to drill holes!
Old 01-19-2006, 08:54 AM
  #108  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
mctwin2kman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: York, PA
Posts: 2,753
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2003 C230K Sport Coupe, 1986 190E 2.3
Originally Posted by mleskovar
Wait a minute.....it takes at least a month to get the plates in CA so this reasoning doesn't hold water. If you asked to have the front side windows tinted they would do it....and that's against the law in CA. Right? I would not accept the car without a repalcement bumper that is nano coated, not just repaired in their shop. You paid for the car and should get what you want...period. The dealer is not responsible for enforcing the law and wouldn't get the ticket for tinting or a missing front plate. They didn't put the front plate bracket on my car without me even asking and said bring it in when the plates come and they'll take care of it then if I wanted to.
Well in the end yes you should get what you want. But this is a sticky situation for some dealers. I used to live in NYS and my family owned a dealership. We had to put the front plate frames on. Not by law or anything but it was just easier to have the rule. I live in PA and enjoy having no front plate now.....
Old 01-19-2006, 09:52 AM
  #109  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
electromethod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: stix of florida
Posts: 2,618
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Honda Grom
It's two tiny holes in the bumper that you fill with bumper plugs. Big deal. Get over it. I can't believe people get spastic over this.
Old 01-19-2006, 10:25 AM
  #110  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Saprissa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: San Diego, CA & San Jose, Costa Rica & Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 9,498
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
1959 220S / 1979 230 G / 2002 A210 AMG / 2003 C320 SC / 2004.5 C320 SS / 2005 ML350 SE / 2008 smart
there's a band of people out there in SoCal, going around removing front license plates from as many cars as possible. They are hitting malls, shopping centers, business parks. Their goal is to take as many front license plates off cars as possible.

and what do they do with all these front license plates ? sell them as souvenirs in Latin America.
Old 01-19-2006, 10:34 AM
  #111  
Admin Alumni
 
MB-BOB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,143
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 12 Posts
See Garage
Originally Posted by electromethod
It's two tiny holes in the bumper that you fill with bumper plugs. Big deal. Get over it. I can't believe people get spastic over this.
Manufacturers go to great lengths to fine tune the aerodynamics of the front facia of every car to minimize drag... then the states require a slab-sided bumper plate, counter to the goal. Not to be a tree-hugger, but it wastes natural resources to make a second plate, and also costs more for the state to acquire it (it's OK, you pay for it with your taxes). Then of course, the plate causes marginally less fuel economy per car, which (given the effect of large numbers) pressures the demand for petroleum, which contributes to the price of gasoline. A front plate also compromises the bumper's design in doing it's job in low speed crashes, contributing to higher repair costs.

I believe in following the law, of course, but I believe the only reason for it is to benefit law enforcement, presumably in catching us doing something wrong, a presumption of guilt -- rather than innocence -- on all car owners. But at minimum, plate laws do not outweigh a greater need to be fuel efficient, imo.

I requested no plate mount on mine (in Missouri) and got what I asked, only to find out a year later that the bumper was drilled, but refinished without the holes prior to delivery. It looks fine. The Bumper plugs are OK, but not as clean as a pristine bumper.

As for whose responsibility it is to install the plate, keep in mind dealers are licensed by the state, so if they don't comply with state law, they could be held liable to lose their business licenses. Having the purchaser sign a waiver helps protect them (in case you buy the car at a plate state dealer, but register it in a non-plate state), but if tested in court will probably not stand.

So, while all of us would like to control our own cars, we must be content to recognize the dealer has obligations, and that if we chose to not display the front plate, we take responsibility for it when caught.
Old 01-19-2006, 10:48 AM
  #112  
MBWorld Fanatic!

 
C43AMG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 5,761
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
98 Black C43 , 08' ML320 CDI ,11 E63
I feel the manufacturers should make a better mounting bracket that attaches to the underside of the bumper and suspends the plate off the front of the bumper so that if it has to be mounted or removed it preserves the original design of the car.
Old 01-19-2006, 11:02 AM
  #113  
Jkw
Senior Member
 
Jkw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Jersey
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2004.5 C 230
FIXEDupW209,
Good luck,
I hope you had it in writing, When I bought my car I had the write right on the contract, No Dealer Insignia, of course there was one, but they were able to get it off w/out damaging the paint, or I wouldn't have accepted delivery.
My buddy did the same thing years ago when they were still screwing them on, they replaced the trunk lid before he would take delivery.
Jkw
Old 01-19-2006, 11:26 AM
  #114  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Trekman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Bay Area SF
Posts: 1,193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Silver 2002 C32, Silver 2006 CLK 350
its funny cuz I know for a fact that if anyone here got pulled over for not having front plates, we would tell the cop that it came from the dealer with out it....
Old 01-19-2006, 11:54 AM
  #115  
Super Member
 
SteveL1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: ST. Louis, MO
Posts: 868
Received 35 Likes on 21 Posts
'16 SL550, '18 Porsche Macan GTS
Unfortunatly, the only way that you will have any legal recorse with the dealer is if you wrote on the sales contract that you demand that no holes were to be drilled in the bumper. That way, they sign it and are obligated to provide you with what you ordered. If not in writing, you just have to hope that they are willing to work with you.

By the way, BumperPlugs.com does a nice job! I know a bunch of Porsche guys that have them and unless you are within 10ft of the car, you can not tell they are there.
Old 01-19-2006, 01:10 PM
  #116  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
mleskovar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Huntington Beach, Ca.
Posts: 5,784
Received 148 Likes on 132 Posts
'17 Jaguar XF
And???

What happened?
Old 01-19-2006, 01:37 PM
  #117  
Senior Member
 
k_lundquist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Avon, CT
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
07 G35 Sport 6MT, 2005 C230K SS (sold), 1998 Jeep GC 4x4 (da-heep!)
Ok I'm sorry... Loss of Aerodynamics? Extra Fuel Consumption? Getting a new bumper?? All over something that is supposed to LEGALLY BE THERE.

I could understand if we were talking about dealer advertisements on the car. I asked for that not to be on mine and they put it on anyway. They of course removed them with no damage, if there was some damage I'd be as "Fcking Pissed Off" as you are now.

But come-on dude, a license plate mount? Now you're just being an over-demanding customer. I would totally agree if the dealer decides to hold your deposit because you made a stink over a $15 part on a $30,000+ car and refused delivery.

Last edited by k_lundquist; 01-19-2006 at 02:25 PM.
Old 01-19-2006, 01:46 PM
  #118  
Super Member
 
pookie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: michigan/ohio/indiana
Posts: 917
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2013 c300 4matic, 2002 c240
luckily for me, my dealer forgets to do lots of things from delivery to service. it seems they really do not have it together (they have a new SA nearly every 2-4months)
Old 01-19-2006, 02:32 PM
  #119  
Admin Alumni
 
MB-BOB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,143
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 12 Posts
See Garage
Originally Posted by k_lundquist
Ok I'm sorry... Loss of Aerodynamics? Extra Fuel Consumption? Getting a new bumper?? All over something that is supposed to LEGALLY BE THERE.
Most states require a front plate, but 40% of states do not, or have actually repealed the requirement.

Texas passed its front plate law only 10-years ago, and law enforcement has been fighting a defiant citizenry since. I estimate the compliance rate in TX at about 75%.

You can join 13,000 people who have signed the petition to repeal the law in Texas -- if you wish -- by going HERE Do a google search on front license plate to see the petitions currently being collected in Minnesota, New Jersey, Ohio, Maryland, and California, in addition to Texas. So, it's not a "Red State/Blue State" issue.

I have not seen a front plate on a Corvette in decades, even in the states that require them. Doesn't make it legal, of course. Point is, there seems to be a developing groundswell to do away with them.
Old 01-19-2006, 02:53 PM
  #120  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
mleskovar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Huntington Beach, Ca.
Posts: 5,784
Received 148 Likes on 132 Posts
'17 Jaguar XF
Originally Posted by k_lundquist
Now you're just being an over-demanding customer.
"Over-demanding" customers do not exist, only customer demands. If...as a retailer...you do not meet customer demands then you deserve to lose customers. If..as a consumer...you do not get what you expect and pay for then you are either intimidated, don't care, or just plain not smart. Every time (which is too often ) I cleaned my front bumper and had to touch up around the plugs I would be reminded I didn't get what I wanted. Petty? To each his own.
Old 01-19-2006, 02:53 PM
  #121  
Admin Alumni
 
MB-BOB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,143
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 12 Posts
See Garage
Originally Posted by C43AMG
I feel the manufacturers should make a better mounting bracket that attaches to the underside of the bumper and suspends the plate off the front of the bumper so that if it has to be mounted or removed it preserves the original design of the car.
A member here designed an under-bumper bracket several years ago. So far it's collecting dust in my hard drive...
Attached Thumbnails W203/CL203 TICKETED "for not having a front plate" Thread-front-plate-mount.jpg  
Old 01-19-2006, 03:43 PM
  #122  
ON PROBATION
 
ClayJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 5,024
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MB-BOB
Most states require a front plate, but 40% of states do not, or have actually repealed the requirement.
Texas passed its front plate law only 10-years ago, and law enforcement has been fighting a defiant citizenry since. I estimate the compliance rate in TX at about 75%.
You can join 13,000 people who have signed the petition to repeal the law in Texas -- if you wish -- by going HERE Do a google search on front license plate to see the petitions currently being collected in Minnesota, New Jersey, Ohio, Maryland, and California, in addition to Texas. So, it's not a "Red State/Blue State" issue.
I have not seen a front plate on a Corvette in decades, even in the states that require them. Doesn't make it legal, of course. Point is, there seems to be a developing groundswell to do away with them.
Hmmmmm...why do I find myself quoting you so often MB-BOB...?

Example: Nevada -

Las Vegas Review Journal Nov. 02, 2005
ROAD WARRIOR Q&A :
One more thing: Last week, we told you that Nevada drivers must display license plates on the front of their cars. Since then, the Road Warrior's Department of New Laws Nobody Knows About called up our international headquarters to alert them that's not so any longer in the Silver State.
"They passed a law that said if you have a motor vehicle that isn't set up for a front license plate, you don't have to have one," said Tom Jacobs, a spokesman with the Nevada Department of Motor Vehicles.

This is what the law now reads, in part:
"If the motor vehicle was not manufactured to include a bracket, device or other contrivance to display and secure a front license plate, and if the manufacturer of the motor vehicle provided no other means or method by which a front license plate may be displayed upon and secured to the motor vehicle: (a) One license plate must be attached to the motor vehicle in the rear; and (b) The other license plate may, at the option of the owner of the vehicle, be attached to the motor vehicle in the front."

In layman's terms, if there's no license plate holder or bracket in front of your car, you don't need to rig a plate to the front. The law took effect July 1.

My bad for missing out on the update in the first place. But at least it's good to see our state Legislature hard at work on issues affecting the health, safety and welfare of all Nevadans -- like sparing a Ferrari owner the pain and suffering of having to bruise his baby's front bumper with an ugly ol' license plate.

[italics mine, sarcasm hers (she probably drives a Ford Explorer )]

Last edited by ClayJ; 01-19-2006 at 03:46 PM.
Old 01-19-2006, 04:03 PM
  #123  
Senior Member
 
k_lundquist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Avon, CT
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
07 G35 Sport 6MT, 2005 C230K SS (sold), 1998 Jeep GC 4x4 (da-heep!)
Originally Posted by mleskovar
"Over-demanding" customers do not exist, only customer demands. If...as a retailer...you do not meet customer demands then you deserve to lose customers. If..as a consumer...you do not get what you expect and pay for then you are either intimidated, don't care, or just plain not smart. Every time (which is too often ) I cleaned my front bumper and had to touch up around the plugs I would be reminded I didn't get what I wanted. Petty? To each his own.
I'll agree with you for the most part. However its a two way street. Retailers are in the business of making money. Thus to keep customers they have to keep them happy; but there most certainly are over demanding customers. Throughout most of college I worked in retail and I can't tell you enough stories about "Customers who are always right." Often these customers present outlandish requests, which from a business stand point do not make any sense to a retailer to satisfy. Asking for a new bumper, when it can be filled with 2 plugs, is one of them.

That being said, I'm starting to look at my car's nose and thinking about what it would look like w/o the front plate. Although I'm sure those plugs wouldn't bother me much, the ticket from the CT cop would bother me more! Of course that's just me.
Old 01-19-2006, 04:09 PM
  #124  
Almost a Member!
 
sytfu_c230's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
consider yourself lucky, only 2 holes. When the dealer did mines (smythe european) they somehow managed to drill 6 holes into my bumper, I'm assuming they used too long of screws, I complained to the saleperson & the service managers, all they kept saying that I have to have it anyways, and yet others get to sign a waiver...well my front bumper ended up getting hit by someone not too long after anywyas and needs to be repainted so I had the bodyshop do it, but still next time dealer sticks me with a front plate I'm walking away.
Old 01-19-2006, 04:31 PM
  #125  
Admin Alumni
 
MB-BOB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,143
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 12 Posts
See Garage
Originally Posted by ClayJ
Hmmmmm...why do I find myself quoting you so often MB-BOB...?
Maybe we just think alike? I'm sure it's not because we both are wiser with age...

As you can tell, this little license plate issue means something to me. IMO, when you think of why these plates REALLY are "required" it takes on Big Brother significance.

People park in lots "head-in" 98% of the time, so a front plate can't be seen by a Police Car patrolling the lot. And some perp speeding away from a crime scene shows the police his tail, not his front. So, no help for the Cops in these cases.

But it does aid those intersection cameras that snap photos of front bumpers and driver's faces as they run lights. And it's no secret the vertical face of the plate in front provides an ideal reflective "Target" giving accurate readings for radar and laser speed guns. So, in short, we have these laws to promote revenue generation by local governments?

As a non-speeder and one who hates red light runners, I don't find these benefits sufficient to outweigh the detriments noted previously. I know it's just me... or not.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: W203/CL203 TICKETED "for not having a front plate" Thread



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:12 PM.