C350 0-60mph
#3
Thats faster time than MBUSA post data(0-60 in 6.1 ) !!
Kleemann is going to have Kompressor kit for the new V6 24 valve engine(2.5L,3.0L,3.5L in 2006 C Class) in the near future ( spring,2006) .Time to save money now !!
Kleemann is going to have Kompressor kit for the new V6 24 valve engine(2.5L,3.0L,3.5L in 2006 C Class) in the near future ( spring,2006) .Time to save money now !!
#4
Originally Posted by trust203
Thats faster time than MBUSA post data(0-60 in 6.1 ) !!
Ya does anyone ever think that MB understates both their 0-60 times and their hp numbers?
By understating hp numbers, I mean the drivetrain loss (rwhp) has a lot lower percentage than most car manufacturers. Is this right?
#5
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
2014 CLS550 4Matic
Originally Posted by mick1
it sure is quicker than the c320 but you have only had the C320 for less than a year. you're going to change car already ?
-Jeffy
#6
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: May 2002
Location: The blue white rock, third out.
Posts: 2,916
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2002 C230 Coupe(M111)
Originally Posted by Jeffy
Car and Driver just drove the C350 (6-spd manual) 0-60MPH in 5.5 seconds. Niiiiiiice.
I'll be ordering mine later this month.
-Jeffy
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
![thumbs](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/thumbsup.gif)
-Jeffy
Hey, pukes at MBUSA that supposedly lurk here....where's our C350 Coupes you *******s?
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Gadsden, Alabama
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
'06 C350 4MATIC
Kleeman?
I have a 06' C350 4MATIC... Now I need to save my pennies up for the Kleeman!
Darn you all! <smile> Those Kleeman people are evil, evil, evil.. or as Mike Meyers would say "eeveil"
I am still babying it with less than 1000 miles.
Darn you all! <smile> Those Kleeman people are evil, evil, evil.. or as Mike Meyers would say "eeveil"
I am still babying it with less than 1000 miles.
Trending Topics
#10
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: FL410
Posts: 4,968
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
'05 E320 CDI, '08 BMW X5 4.8i, '11 Duramax 2500HD
Originally Posted by Humbucker87
Ya does anyone ever think that MB understates both their 0-60 times and their hp numbers?
By understating hp numbers, I mean the drivetrain loss (rwhp) has a lot lower percentage than most car manufacturers. Is this right?
By understating hp numbers, I mean the drivetrain loss (rwhp) has a lot lower percentage than most car manufacturers. Is this right?
#12
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: May 2002
Location: The blue white rock, third out.
Posts: 2,916
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2002 C230 Coupe(M111)
Originally Posted by advans
yeah I need to go test drive the C350s, might get attracted to it, and buy one! but if so, i'd wait for the w204s?
New S Class and new CL are also not that good looking...not hoping for much from the new styling team at MB.
#13
Super Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
C 230K Coupé
If you've ever taken a look at the MB usa website you might of noticed that all the 65 AMG's have the same 0-60 times. The Cl, the Sl, and the S. Now we all know it's impossible to obtain the same times on cars that weigh differently. But i think my friend and I came up with an explanation for that. First off, i'm pretty sure MB tests their cars with ESP on. They pretty much floor the car from a stop and calculate the 0-60. They don't break torque. Now for a 6 speed manual I believe it's the same story, ESP on, and i doubt they drop the clutch from 3500 rpm! So yes, MB usa numbers are ALWAYS slower than the actual just cause of the way they test them.
#14
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: SF YAY area
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CLS, C
Originally Posted by Outland
Previews of W204 have not been flattering. Distinctly asian looking, with an ugly interior.
New S Class and new CL are also not that good looking...not hoping for much from the new styling team at MB.
New S Class and new CL are also not that good looking...not hoping for much from the new styling team at MB.
i love how my cls looks
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#15
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: May 2002
Location: The blue white rock, third out.
Posts: 2,916
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2002 C230 Coupe(M111)
Originally Posted by vyruz
i love how my cls looks ![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#16
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: May 2002
Location: The blue white rock, third out.
Posts: 2,916
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2002 C230 Coupe(M111)
Originally Posted by r3v1ls
If you've ever taken a look at the MB usa website you might of noticed that all the 65 AMG's have the same 0-60 times. The Cl, the Sl, and the S. Now we all know it's impossible to obtain the same times on cars that weigh differently. But i think my friend and I came up with an explanation for that. First off, i'm pretty sure MB tests their cars with ESP on. They pretty much floor the car from a stop and calculate the 0-60. They don't break torque. Now for a 6 speed manual I believe it's the same story, ESP on, and i doubt they drop the clutch from 3500 rpm! So yes, MB usa numbers are ALWAYS slower than the actual just cause of the way they test them.
#18
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2002 C230K Coupe & 2005 C230 SS
Originally Posted by Jeffy
Plus, the sooner I sell the 320 the less money I lose.
-Jeffy
-Jeffy
That having been said if you have enough disposable income go for it!!
#19
Super Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: troyes, france
Posts: 552
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ML 320 CDI
Originally Posted by trust203
Thats faster time than MBUSA post data(0-60 in 6.1 ) !!
Kleemann is going to have Kompressor kit for the new V6 24 valve engine(2.5L,3.0L,3.5L in 2006 C Class) in the near future ( spring,2006) .Time to save money now !!
Kleemann is going to have Kompressor kit for the new V6 24 valve engine(2.5L,3.0L,3.5L in 2006 C Class) in the near future ( spring,2006) .Time to save money now !!
#20
Newbie
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Rowland Heights, CA
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Slk 230
does anyone know how much the brabus kit will be. Im planning to buy a c350 soon and i emailed brabus about the price for the kit but they never responded. anyone?
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#21
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 1,238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'05 C230SS 6MT, 1966 Triumph TR4a IRS, Shelby Cobra 427 Supercharged
Originally Posted by r3v1ls
If you've ever taken a look at the MB usa website you might of noticed that all the 65 AMG's have the same 0-60 times. The Cl, the Sl, and the S. Now we all know it's impossible to obtain the same times on cars that weigh differently. But i think my friend and I came up with an explanation for that. First off, i'm pretty sure MB tests their cars with ESP on. They pretty much floor the car from a stop and calculate the 0-60. They don't break torque. Now for a 6 speed manual I believe it's the same story, ESP on, and i doubt they drop the clutch from 3500 rpm! So yes, MB usa numbers are ALWAYS slower than the actual just cause of the way they test them.
MB tests 0-100kmh (and uses that as our 0-60 #) with a 75 kilo driver, 10 kilo's of luggage and a full tank of gas under not so ideal conditions, I'm pretty sure they leave ESP on and do not break torque. Now if only I weighed 75 kilos, damn physically fit Europeans!!!
Last edited by Capt Nemo o2; 10-09-2005 at 11:01 PM.