test drive C280
option 1- replace the <3 C320 coupe for the 280? and I take my brothers 230k
option 2- replace the 230k for the 280?
or my wish option (hope my brother somehow spits up money to get a C350)
In my opinion, it is far easier to enjoy/use the straightline acceleration advantage the C280 has over the C230K on everyday roads. Yes, the C280 won't "handle" as well, but I really don't think this will make a big difference unless you corner regularly like you're on a race track.
Furthermore, things like supension, brakes, bodykits and rims can all potentially be upgraded in the aftermarket. What is not so easy is changing the heart of the car: the engine.
I much prefer the sport ride and you would need new springs, shocks, sway bars, wheels, tires to make it handle like a C230, much less the bigger brakes, AMG bodykit, sport steering wheel and blue windows. Plus, I like the aluminum trim better than the wood trim.
it is constantly searching for a gear and is rather slow in doing so, i did not find the car more "fun" or "powerful" compared to my 230, i had the 280 for almost a week while my 230 was in for maitenance and yes the 280 has more power on paper but because of the tranny cannot put it on the pavement, even in tiptronic.
i say stick with the c230 or get a c32...
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
i think they should have just up'd it to a 6 spd auto for MY06 rather then adding 2 gears, or atleast save the 7G for the higher output engines which could use the extra gear...
what part of chicago you from? im originaly am from there (logan square) and moved to the bay about 3 years ago. o how miss the windy city!!

I moved here from ATL just over a year ago. I actually live near Schaumburg but I go into the city quite often. There's definitely always something going on here!
I personally dont like the C280 because it doesnt have that "performance" kinda feel like my 320, I kinda want the 230k but kinda want to coupe my coupe...really its up to my brother, see what he wants to do
According to MB-USA's website, these are the 0-60mph times for the sedan(all with automatic transmission so you can compare fairly)
2005 C230K 7.5 seconds
2006 C230 8.5 seconds
2006 C280 6.9 seconds
2006 C350 6.1 seconds
Therefore, I think it is likely that a stock 2006 C280 can out accelerate a stock 2005 C230K, unless MB is deliberately trying to mislead us.
i think they should have just up'd it to a 6 spd auto for MY06 rather then adding 2 gears, or atleast save the 7G for the higher output engines which could use the extra gear...
2. The seven ratios were more about leapfrogging BMW and Audi, then they were an actual performance benefit.
Yeah, I don't care for the 7 speed...its just constantly rowing for a gear. Then again, I don't like automatics in general.
Back on topic...the C280 felt just like the old C320 to me. Soft ride, same power.
I agree with Outland, I think the C280 is like the C320 just a lil quieter, softer ride, no diff if u compare that to the C320 LS, C280= very light and relaxing ride
And the C280 that shows only 1,2,3,4, then D must be a C280 4matic, as they retain the old 5 speed auto.
And the C280 that shows only 1,2,3,4, then D must be a C280 4matic, as they retain the old 5 speed auto.

IMHO the 280 is a MUCH better all around car.







) 