





C230, poor man's Mercedes?
it is given the label because that's how people view it. i don't think you'll get much support on your new claim. so this means the m3 is a poor man's M. silly.
remember, i'm not the one that started this term. the polls show the opinion of people's views on this.
lighten up and enjoy your car. all i said was a lot of people buy into brands. that was my point here. don't tell me you don't think that people do this.
Last edited by amgme; Aug 16, 2002 at 06:02 PM.
it's all about how people view the car and it's simply just that. is a c32 a poor man's amg? probably only in your eyes.
Who's being a little sensitive now?
Last edited by preyx; Aug 16, 2002 at 06:44 PM.
. Just because someone wants a thread closed because someone else disagrees with their opinion will surely not happen. If you ever want to notify me of trouble in a thread or something of that nature, please click on the link that says "Report this post to a Moderator." This is the fastest method of notifying myself or one of the other moderators of something, we will review it, evaluate it, and make a decision.And to get back on topic; Mercedes-Benz was actually debating whether to release the C230k in North America or not. They were afraid that it would tarnish the reputation that Mercedes-Benz has established over the last 100 some odd years.
There is no chance you will ever see the A-Class, V-Class, etc. here in North America anytime soon, because a Mercedes-Benz minivan will surely tarnish MB's reputation.
The reason they have no problem releasing these vehicles (A, V, etc.) in Europe is because over there, the reputation of Mercedes-Benz will not be hurt at all. Across the pond, people do not judge someone on the type of car they drive or how big their house is. Over in Europe, Mercedes-Benz is just an average road car.
Now the question remains: did the C230k Coupe hurt the reputation of Mercedes-Benz? Hell no! They are selling a ton of C230k's and have opened up the Mercedes-Benz market to a whole group of new people.
Do I personally consider the C230k to be a "poormans benz?" No, I do not. Mercedes-Benz targets the C230k to the younger generation between ages 16 and 30. If someones father drives a S500 and has been driving other Mercedes-Benz vehicles for many years, this persons child will most likely receive a Mercedes-Benz when they're 16 and obtain there license; and what car do you think they will be looking at first? The C230k! I know tons of people who have received C230k's from their parents as graduation presents. This is exactly what Mercedes-Benz wants! An entry level vehicle to keep people coming back. If someone is spending $25k+ when they're young, when they are older and much more affluent they will be very inclined to come back and purchase another vehicle upwards of $70k.
In the past recent years, it was very unlikely to see a young person driving a Mercedes-Benz. MB's were targeted towards older retired people. MB has done a fantastic job of changing this image, and the C230k has played an enormous part in this.
I am sure some people will disagree with me, and I hope someone does. The world would be a very dull place if people did not have opinions.
Gotta love it. Only in America!
Forgive me from waving the flag at spoiled rich kids.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
But I seriously believe that if MB got such a huge success by opening into lower markets, I'd love to see them bring over the A and V class. The A would be a great car to enter into a market dominated by Japanese companies with a sprinkiling of American and German ones.
And as for the V, they missed the opportunity when minivans were in the heyday before SUVs took over, but I'd still like to see them bring it over. My feeling is it'd bring more meaning to the phrase "travelling in style". I realize this is cutting into the "status symbol" aspect of it, which people really dislike, but it's still somewhat true, even of a C230k.
I hope MB will continue to bring great things, and I don't doubt for a second that they will deliver cars that I know I will be happy with.
The original reason I was getting so heated up over the forums was that the discussion seemed to deteriorate at some points, but with a charged question like this, I suppose it's expected... :o
forums are places where ppl can post their opinions and see how others will react~ for those of u getting so angery @ my opinion, u guyz sure entertained me very much & i like to say thank u~ 84 posts on my pole~
just look at the poll and see what other people views are. it's a pmb.
Why should MB wait until people are in their 30's b4 they try and start building brand loyalty? Brand loyalty should start sooner. With the 230, it will. They can get kids in their cars and they can have them as customers for life. Start at a 230, got to a 320, then an CLK, kids come, then an E, maybe an S, kids leave, midlife crisis, buy a CL.
As for the 230 being a "Poor Man's" MB. I think not. A Mercedes is not a poor man's mercedes. Another car of another make that "tries too hard" to be as good as an MB is a poor man's MB. It reminds me of when I bought my 318i 5 years ago. My "friend" always used to talk **** about how it was a poor man's bimmer. Meanwhile he used to drive his Daddy's loaded Toyota Camry with V6, leather, Premium CD sound system. You name it, this car had it. And it dawned on me, HIS car was the poor man's BMW. His camry is trying way too hard to be something it's not.
As for the 230 not being an attractive car, well, looks are totally subjective. What I don't understand is how people can say that a 230 looks "cheap". How a 230 can look "cheap" is beyond me. What does "cheap" look like? Say you don't like this or that for this reason or another, but don't utter stupidity like "I don't like the car, I think it looks cheap". WTF does that mean? You may not like the rear end styling. That's valid. You may think the suspension is not firm enough. That's valid. But cheap is BS.
OK, I'm done. Have I made any sense?
I think if u consider the c230k a poor mans mercdes i actually think of those to be poor mans mercedes to.
My c230k is just as MB as my CLK430 which is not as POOR as both of your mercedes.
i am not talking about anyone else with the cars mentioned above but the 2 people mentiond above.
i also might think both of u guys may have considered your cars to be poor mans MB's till the C230k came out. Now u have something to talk about to make u guys feel better.
I still wish they made a convertible c230...I wanted an SLK but I need more room. The reason I went for the C class myself is because cars are a bad investment...it can be said that the more expensive cars as being the equivalent of men buying fancy cars to make up for other shortcomings...as the joke goes that is.
As it stands, I bought my Mercedes for the reliability, quality, style, comfort, design and overall beauty of the car. I looked at a lot of cars and nothing fit the personal needs as much as this car...not to mention, it was the best sales experience of all the cars I looked at.
Just to finish it off, Mercedes is just the poor man's Maybach...ha!
dave
why are the owners of the c230 getting so angry about? i thought that you guys didn't care about what anyone thought. it seems as if they need to defend this labeling because they feel somehow insecure about the car. just way to sensitive about this issue. if it's labelled as that, just accept it. you can't change other people's view on it.
just look at the poll and see what other people views are. it's a pmb.
In Australia, it is an automatic reaction to cut people down who believe in their own minds that they are better than everyone else (maybe you don't but thats the perception you are projecting)...I don't know what the Yanks call it but here its called "tall poppy syndrome".
Anyway, we will have to agree to disagree (even though your argument apparently applies only to the US.).
Last edited by JeT; Aug 17, 2002 at 02:21 AM.
I just got my 10,000 mile servicing last week, and the service department was so nice to me- very professional. They know that I'll wind up giving their company a quarter million in sales over the next 10 years if everything goes as planned. Thats who i like to do business with.
I'm sure most people will agree with me on this one, as I see most people in this forum are in the same catagory as myself. I really tried hard not to reply to this thread, but no one brought this point up, whos with me on this one?
well, i don't have to say any more coz 41% of ppls agree dat c230k is as cheap as they looks (maybe not the owner, who knows and who cares other than themselves)~ and 59% of ppls don't~
forums are places where ppl can post their opinions and see how others will react~ for those of u getting so angery @ my opinion, u guyz sure entertained me very much & i like to say thank u~ 84 posts on my pole~
from my perspective, i definitely think the c230k is a poor man's benz. all of my friends share the same opinion as i do. they actually laugh at the car because it reminds them of the wannabe bimmer 318 hatchback. i also think the c230k is like the bimmer's 318 hatchback where all you're doing is buying into the brand name. yes i know it's a benz but why did people look down on the 318? this is the same from the c230k. it will never be considered a real benz. the c230k = bimmer's 318 and we all know that we considered the 318 a poor man's bimmer. why is this case any different? people wanting to be into the mb crowd will mostly be the ones getting this.

