

















do you like the a$$ on the C230k?
Cheers, BT
old Honda CRXs had the "fake" spoiler with the window
The little blurb on it in CAR was a little harsh.
...but the choices in the poll dont quite allow for my opinion...so I didnt vote...
One other thing, whenever I'm streching my car cover over the big rear end - the thought goes through my head of Jennifer Lopez putting on a pair of jeans (which isn't a bad image).

Cheers, BT
One other thing, whenever I'm streching my car cover over the big rear end - the thought goes through my head of Jennifer Lopez putting on a pair of jeans (which isn't a bad image).
, damn.
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Although it may not be the most common rear design, it's not also the most uncommon. Cars like the Mazda MX-5 and old Honda CRXs had the "fake" spoiler with the window. My feeling is that that particular design was chosen to help the aerodynamics of the car (as can be evidenced by an online article linked here a while ago).
Which is what a rear spoiler is for, in the first place.
Side note for those who don't know this yet: the bigger the spoiler, the higher the drag coefficient, the worse the acceleration. So, if you are trying to improve your 0-60 time, don't add any spolier to the existing one (e.g. RennTech), as it would only hurt.
Last edited by vadim; Aug 16, 2002 at 02:40 PM.
So, if you are trying to improve your 0-60 time, don't add any spolier to the existing one (e.g. RennTech), as it would only hurt.
The coupe's rear spoiler is by no means "fake" - it's very functional, as it does provide downforce to the rear axle at speed just enough to make the car more stable.
I don't really think that my Renntech spoiler is affecting my 0-60 times, cd or downforce - you do realize how small it is, right?
Another example - Audi TT. Ever noticed how tiny its rear spoiler is? Yet they had to add it at some point to address well known stability issues, and it does the job, despite its size. I bet a lot of people even percieve it as a purely cosmetic thingy.
Last edited by vadim; Aug 16, 2002 at 03:08 PM.
Well, the TT's spoiler is much bigger than my spoiler, and does much more to change the cd.
I'll post dynos soon. :p


Looking at it from directly behind, the car looks narrow and tall.
But the worst angle is the rear 3/4 angle. The fender above the rear wheels is too bulky and to me doesn't fit the detailed, finer features of the front of the car.
They also should have made it less "Hatchbacky," a good example is the RSX, which is also a Hatchback but doesn't look it as much.
the worst angle is looking at it from the front side view. it looks too narrow, too tall, and tooooooo much "rake" action going on. it just looks funny.
the rear is toooo rump. looks like it's sticking it's rear end in the air. i think the coupe has too much rake look to it. it's overexaggerated.
the worst angle is looking at it from the front side view. it looks too narrow, too tall, and tooooooo much "rake" action going on. it just looks funny.
Last edited by vadim; Aug 16, 2002 at 06:17 PM.
Funny how so many people refer to the Coupe as "tall" and "narrow" - the C sedans are actally taller - 55.1" vs. Coupe's 54.3", and the width is the same - 68".
The direct rear view of the sedan is also the sedan's worst view. It too looks too tall and narrow.
Umm, maybe they BOTH are tall and narrow.
The direct rear view of the sedan is also the sedan's worst view. It too looks too tall and narrow.
Last edited by amgme; Aug 16, 2002 at 05:33 PM.
I don't really think that my Renntech spoiler is affecting my 0-60 times, cd or downforce - you do realize how small it is, right?
Hmmmmm I wonder what if any real affect my AMG spoiler has....surely it's only a cosmetic thing,bearing in mind it is so tiny do you guyz even realize the AMG styled body has a rear spoiler?
Cheers, BT

