c320 can run on methanol?
in the specs section, it says, "M-85 methanol/gasoline blend, or methanol." in addition to the 91 octane gasoline.
1st, where can you get methanol fuel? 2nd, does it affect the power curve? 3rd, cleaner w/ methanol?
anyone actually try this?
Last edited by young; Aug 28, 2002 at 09:34 PM.
I think methanol is different animal- used in milder alcohol race engines. I thought Indy cars used methanol (I don't follow the current CART/IRL stuff).
A friend of mine has a monster truck with an engine set up to run methanol (not nitromethane). Gasoline is used to start those engines because it ingites at colder engine temps. It's been a while, but this is how I remember it....
Last edited by avlis; Aug 28, 2002 at 10:00 PM.
No, avlis, I'm not thinking of nitromethane. Methanol is not as toxic as nitromethane, but it is still much worse than ethanol.
M-85 is 85% methanol. It requires special and more expensive acid neutralizing oil when used for extended periods. Metanol is usually produced from natural gas. The use of other feedstocks to produce methanol drives up the price. When burned M-85 produces even more carbon monoxide than straight gasoline.
E-85 is 85% ethanol. It is cheaper than methanol and usually produced by fermentation of plant material. E-85 produces less pollutants the M-85. Again, ethanol is far less toxic than methanol, and somewhat less corrosive.
the question is that if we can't even find regular gasoline, how are we going to be able to find methanol when in need?
Alternative Fuels
actually just found some data on pros and cons of alternative fuels from a University of Hawaii study
Alternative Fuels
ABCs of AFVs
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
.Disclaimer: Don't doit!
I have had aircraft engines that run for several hundred hours, and when disassembled they looked like new inside. So how can this be, if methanol is so highly corrosive?
[B]I repeat; methanol is highly toxic. Dont believe me, then maybe you'll believe the EPA http://www.epa.gov/orcdizux/07-meoh.htm
**Methanol is toxic if you drink it. It's alchohol. Not toxic to burn it. It burns clean!**
So it is not corrosive? The Department of Energy disagrees. They think it is. http://www.afdc.doe.gov/altfuel/met_train.html
**Methanol like any other solvent has corrosive properties. Methanol's less corrosive to metal than fossil fuel.**
Methanol itself is not toxic but it metabolizes into formaldehyde and formic acid which are toxic. Ingestion of as little as 60 milliliters of methanol can be fatal. http://www.hhmi.org/research/labsafe/lcss/lcss58.html
**DONT DRINK IT!! Would you drink a cup of Mobil/Exxon Premium?**
http://www.orcbs.msu.edu/newsletters...at_report.html
http://www.solardome.com/SolarDome22.html
Here is a copy of the Material Safety Data Sheet which must be included with every shipment of methanol: http://www.udallas.edu/chemdept/hend...hanol_msds.htm
Here is another EPA site which says because of methanol's corrosive characteristics that specialized fuel system is needed to handle it. http://www.epa.gov/otaq/consumer/fue...s/methanol.pdf
**I think you need to check your attitude at the door, put down the fact books and stop micro-analyzing everything as a personal attack on your intellect. To use the vernacular....CHILL DUDE!**
Last edited by Rick; Aug 29, 2002 at 08:48 AM.
Certainly they wouldn't be able to support a 4/50 warrantee if it wasn't.
Methanol powered vehicles have been around and used in limited circumstances for almost 30 years. Multiple fuel systems have also been around nearly as long. I would applaud mercedes for making this possible in a consumer level vehicle.







