C-Class (W203) 2001-2007, C160, C180, C200, C220, C230, C240, C270, C280, C300, C320, C230K, C350, Coupe

2.3 Compressor Power

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 10-03-2002, 09:21 AM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Jerry MB230K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2.3 Compressor Power

Again, my C230 is in the shop for a few days, and I have a 2000 C230K loaner. The loaner ( with 25,000 miles ) has power to spare compared to my 2002 coupe...the loaner's acceleration and torque is amazing .
I'm beginning to wonder why my coupe , with the same engine, doesn't perform as well . Does power come with age or beauty ?
Old 10-03-2002, 09:32 AM
  #2  
Out Of Control!!
 
tommy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Westwood, NJ
Posts: 10,067
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
2004 Civic Si. FWD for the Win!
I've always heard that MB engines take longer than most to fully break-in and live up to their potential.

Don't know, but another possibility is that the gearing in the slushbox was better for the '00, so that MB geared the '02 more for gas mileage? Just a thought.
Old 10-03-2002, 09:37 AM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
avlis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Nashua, NH
Posts: 1,265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2008 VW GTI
They gave me a 2000 230K loaner a while back. It had 80k and didn't feel any more powerful then my coupe with a stick. It rode and drove like it was new though (happily surprised). I test drove an auto coupe before I bought my car and I hated it. Way too unresponsive. I too think the 2000 230k felt better than the auto coupe.

Last edited by avlis; 10-03-2002 at 09:40 AM.
Old 10-03-2002, 09:40 AM
  #4  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Jerry MB230K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
comparison is auto 2000 C230K sedan with auto 2002 C230K coupe
Old 10-03-2002, 10:03 AM
  #5  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
TimmyC230boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Sitting behind thing freakin desk of mine. Dreaming I was playing my Taylors, and driving my Benz. Long Live The VRAA!!!!!!
Posts: 2,924
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
C230 Sports Coupe
as far as respnsiveness, didn't the 2002 C230 have athrottle cable, and the new coupe have a DBW system?
Old 10-03-2002, 10:07 AM
  #6  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Jerry MB230K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
what's a dbw .. electronic ?
Old 10-03-2002, 10:12 AM
  #7  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
TimmyC230boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Sitting behind thing freakin desk of mine. Dreaming I was playing my Taylors, and driving my Benz. Long Live The VRAA!!!!!!
Posts: 2,924
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
C230 Sports Coupe
sorry, DBW is drive by wire. On the coupe when you hit the gas there is no throttle cable there like in older cars. The gas pedal sends a signal to the ECU which inturn, gives the car fuel. On older cars you hit the gas, and that opens the throttle body.

For the most part DBW systems are slower to respond to pedal travel.
Old 10-03-2002, 10:15 AM
  #8  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Jerry MB230K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thanks, that explains it. When I step on the gas pedal in my coupe, I guess I'm really just sending a signal to the computer, and the computer decides how fast the car goes based on some conditions.
Old 10-03-2002, 10:35 AM
  #9  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
TimmyC230boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Sitting behind thing freakin desk of mine. Dreaming I was playing my Taylors, and driving my Benz. Long Live The VRAA!!!!!!
Posts: 2,924
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
C230 Sports Coupe
you got it.
Have you ever driven a chevy or a ford. Have you ever noticed that if you are cruising and depress the pedal 1/4 or 1/3 of the way it wont donwshift but the car will kinda "lung" or "jump" forward. The Benz wont do much of that UNLESS you are in a low gear at a high RPM. The Benz will just speed up it won't "jump", like a Camaro or a Mustang would. I belive on the W203 series cars they still had a throttle cable.

http://www.edmunds.com/news/innovati...3/article.html

That will explain more than I can.
Old 10-03-2002, 05:06 PM
  #10  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
AndrewK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Vienna, Austria
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Audi S4
The 2000 C230K had an electronic drive by wire throttle, so I dont think thats the difference.

Last edited by AndrewK; 10-03-2002 at 05:11 PM.
Old 10-03-2002, 06:18 PM
  #11  
Super Member
 
viper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 756
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2000 C230 auto - 3250 lbs
2002 C230 auto - 3340 lbs

The 2000 should feel a bit more lively. Its 90 lbs lighter.
Old 10-03-2002, 08:33 PM
  #12  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Mike T.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver Island, B.C. Canada
Posts: 1,377
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2005 smart cabrio; 2008 Mercedes-Benz B 200
Yeah, but

It's only got 185 HP, not 192. Hmmm...
Old 10-04-2002, 08:28 AM
  #13  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Jerry MB230K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How Do I know ?

So reviewing your posts, it seems like the acceleration and feel should be nearly the same for the 2000 C230K sedan and the "new" 2002 C230K coupe.
So when you buy a new coupe and it feels great, how do you know if your coupe is performing on average ( to other 2002 2.3 coupes) or if your coupe perhaps needs to be "tuned-up" ? I guess as long as a new car is running OK, you just accept it's performance as is.....or do you ?
Old 10-04-2002, 08:38 AM
  #14  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
avlis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Nashua, NH
Posts: 1,265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2008 VW GTI
Re: Yeah, but

Originally posted by Mike T.
It's only got 185 HP, not 192. Hmmm...
It's got to be the transmission gearing or the rear end gearing. I'd bet the 2000 has lower (numericaly higher) rear end gears.
Old 10-04-2002, 09:47 AM
  #15  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
TimmyC230boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Sitting behind thing freakin desk of mine. Dreaming I was playing my Taylors, and driving my Benz. Long Live The VRAA!!!!!!
Posts: 2,924
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
C230 Sports Coupe
yeah Avlis I think your right.
Old 10-04-2002, 09:59 AM
  #16  
Out Of Control!!
 
tommy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Westwood, NJ
Posts: 10,067
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
2004 Civic Si. FWD for the Win!
Wish I had said that in the first response to this post...

I want my props!
Old 10-04-2002, 10:06 AM
  #17  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
TimmyC230boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Sitting behind thing freakin desk of mine. Dreaming I was playing my Taylors, and driving my Benz. Long Live The VRAA!!!!!!
Posts: 2,924
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
C230 Sports Coupe
Originally posted by tommy
Wish I had said that in the first response to this post...

I want my props!
Your right Tommy!
Old 10-04-2002, 02:13 PM
  #18  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
trench's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 2,465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2002 C230 K
Re: Re: Yeah, but

Originally posted by avlis
It's got to be the transmission gearing or the rear end gearing. I'd bet the 2000 has lower (numericaly higher) rear end gears.
Rear-end ratios
2000 C230K 3.27:1
2002 C230K 3.27:1

Gearbox ratios
2000 C230K 3.93/2.41/1.49/1.00/0.83:1
2002 C230K 3.95/2.42/1.49/1.00/0.83:1

- BT
Old 10-04-2002, 02:15 PM
  #19  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
avlis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Nashua, NH
Posts: 1,265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2008 VW GTI
Oh :o :o
Old 10-04-2002, 02:20 PM
  #20  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Jerry MB230K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So, TRENCH, what does it all mean ( the ratios ) ? Which car will accelerate quicker in what gear ?
Old 10-04-2002, 02:25 PM
  #21  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
trench's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 2,465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2002 C230 K
They're essentially the same, so gearing isn't the answer.

Must be that the older motor is more broken in - as the power to weight difference should favor the 2002 slightly.

2000 3250lbs+175lb driver/185hp = 18.51 lb/hp
2002 3340lbs+175lb driver/192hp = 18.30 lb/hp

Cheers, BT
Old 10-04-2002, 02:29 PM
  #22  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Jerry MB230K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thank you, TRENCH, and thanks for getting us back on topic.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: 2.3 Compressor Power



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:25 AM.