Renntech Intercooler
Hope it all works out well Buell
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
vadim, you are correct on the flow(turbulence) that you say would be present, and this would be the case if the air was flowing through on its own. but once you pressurize the air, flow design isnt much of a consideration. this is why on forced induced cars a ported cylinder head isnt as important as it is on a na car. another analogy would be plumbing. if you take 70 psi of water pressure and run it through 25 90 degree bends, the outlet pressure is still 70 psi. when things are under pressure, the flow isnt nearly as important.
Equal voltage applied to a circuit - the higher the resistance, the lower the current - as we know from the Ohm law, I=U/R.
Returning to the subject: under equal pressures, the intercooler with better porting (less resistance) will allow more air through, which means better efficiency.
Last edited by vadim; Oct 26, 2002 at 09:16 PM.
Randy
Under pressure you will have friction loss. That is dependent on the suface properties more than shape. Randy
I'm not disputing the gains that this particular intercooler helps to achieve, I'm just trying to speculate as to why it wasn't made even more efficient. By comparing the stock intercooler with the Renntech one, I'm still wondering why smooth porting wasn't used on the latter, as there seems to be enough room for that.
Last edited by vadim; Oct 26, 2002 at 09:11 PM.
Not only friction losses. Turbulence creates resistance to the flow, and it is directly related to the configuration of the plumbing. In addition to reduced air flow (=less boost), any resistance means that there is an energy loss in form of heat. This means that such intercooler will be less efficient as such.
I'm not disputing the gains that this particular intercooler helps to achieve, I'm just trying to speculate as to why it wasn't made even more efficient. By comparing the stock intercooler with the Rentech one, I'm still wondering why smooth porting wasn't used on the latter, as there seems to be enough room for that.
Randy
who knows. is all i can say is that this ic does work, and it works good. i felt the inlet side after driving a car with one on it and it was friggen hot, however the outlet side was nice and cool.
Reports that each consecutive run yields less power compared to the previous one leads me to believe that the intercooler's core accumulates heat and is unable to dissipate it quickly enough. If this is the case, then an additional heat sink may help.
Last edited by vadim; Oct 26, 2002 at 09:27 PM.
Buellwinkle,
That's my intercooler !!!!!
When are you coming by to pick it up?
Just a thought - what if an add-on heat sink is attached to the stock intercooler, much like those used to cool computer CPUs?
Reports that each consecutive run yields less power compared to the previous one leads me to believe that the intercooler's core accumulates heat and is unable to dissipate it quickly enough. If this is the case, then an additional heat sink may help.
The Renntech intercooler does just that. It is much more massive than the stock intercooler. It also has three times the surface area, if I remember correctly.
even if you dont get that much of a gain, that is one nice looking intercooler compared to the stock one!
http://www.audiworld.com/tech/eng22.shtml
The electronics I've seen are very clever, they measure intercooler core temp, ambient temp and fuel injector pulse width and calculate when it's time to spray. Here's a link for a good practical article on the unit.
http://www.audiworld.com/tech/eng22.shtml



