Always wear your seatbelt
Somewhat surprised that the airbags didn't deploy with that much front end damage. Maybe since it looks like an offset crash with more damage on the passenger side - my guess is that there wasn't anyone in the passenger seat.
BT
That sucks.
Somewhat surprised that the airbags didn't deploy with that much front end damage. Maybe since it looks like an offset crash with more damage on the passenger side - my guess is that there wasn't anyone in the passenger seat.
BT
Erik
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
anyway, that really sucks, glad you are alright.
Thank God no one was in the passenger seat. I had just dropped the kids off at school.
Hope everyone is ok
People just don't pay attention sometimes...

This is the reason I recently bought my little Benz...
Might be interesting to have your lawyer talk to his lawyer about his bumper height, any mods he did to specifically raise the truck etc.
So glad you and your kids are OK.
Be sure to discuss the airbag issue with Mercedes.
I'm not sure of the US rules (US doesn't have no fault compensation do they?) but you probably have a strong action in negligence for personal injuries and also an action in trespass for damage to propoerty...subject to any statutory limitiations. I'm not sure of this though as I am not familiar with US law.
I would definitely take up the issue of the airbags with MB. The airbags should have deployed regardless of the height of the Truck or the direction of the force.
I agree with grn300m. Front airbags only deploy in cases where the occupant is likely to suffer injurys as a result of hitting the wheel/dashboard (accelerometers measure the force and direction of impact to determine this). Airbags should NOT deploy during all impacts or "just because". This may have been the case with early SRS systems but, it's been proven that airbags can sometimes cause injurys by deploying when they are not needed. The seatbelt was in use and I believe the contoller takes that into account. The controller decided, in this case, that airbags were not needed and it was correct if there were no injurys as a result.
FYI: The controller also decides WHICH airbags to deploy, not just WHEN. So don't be suprised if you don't see side curtains in a frontal impact.
Last edited by avlis; Nov 5, 2002 at 09:32 AM.
I disagree. Where there any injuries as a result of the airbag not deploying? No? Then the airbag did it's job (by staying in the steering wheel) and you have no case. The impact was obviously absorbed by the body structure and the seatbelt did it's job by keeping the occupant restrained. What's the problem?
I disagree. Where there any injuries as a result of the airbag not deploying? No? Then the airbag did it's job (by staying in the steering wheel) and you have no case. The impact was obviously absorbed by the body structure and the seatbelt did it's job by keeping the occupant restrained. What's the problem?
I agree with grn300m. Front airbags only deploy in cases where the occupant is likely to suffer injurys as a result of hitting the wheel/dashboard (accelerometers measure the force and direction of impact to determine this). Airbags should NOT deploy during all impacts or "just because". This may have been the case with early SRS systems but, it's been proven that airbags can sometimes cause injurys by deploying when they are not needed. The seatbelt was in use and I believe the contoller takes that into account. The controller decided, in this case, that airbags were not needed and it was correct if there were no injurys as a result.
FYI: The controller also decides WHICH airbags to deploy, not just WHEN. So don't be suprised if you don't see side curtains in a frontal impact.
I think this matter should be looked into. After all, how do any of us know if the airbags didn't deploy because it was purposely programmed that way, or because they were faulty to begin with?
Erik
Excellent evaluation Avlis, IMO. There are many risks with airbags deploying unnecessarily, and it is probably a credit to MB that they didn't do so. From the picture, it appears that the cabin was pretty much intact.
I guess this is a moot point coz the fact of the matter is serious injury didn't occur, right? But I would want to make sure they do go off if serious injury is a 'certainty'.
But by the looks of this accident there was a high probablity that serious injury could have occurred.
Those new Dodge trucks are big and high standing, how fast was it going? how bad did the truck look after the wreck?
Thanks for sharing this story, I always wear my seat belt, and I'll be more concious to continue to use it now.
I disagree. Where there any injuries as a result of the airbag not deploying? No? Then the airbag did it's job (by staying in the steering wheel) and you have no case. The impact was obviously absorbed by the body structure and the seatbelt did it's job by keeping the occupant restrained. What's the problem?
I agree with grn300m. Front airbags only deploy in cases where the occupant is likely to suffer injurys as a result of hitting the wheel/dashboard (accelerometers measure the force and direction of impact to determine this). Airbags should NOT deploy during all impacts or "just because". This may have been the case with early SRS systems but, it's been proven that airbags can sometimes cause injurys by deploying when they are not needed. The seatbelt was in use and I believe the contoller takes that into account. The controller decided, in this case, that airbags were not needed and it was correct if there were no injurys as a result.
FYI: The controller also decides WHICH airbags to deploy, not just WHEN. So don't be suprised if you don't see side curtains in a frontal impact.



