C-Class (W203) 2001-2007, C160, C180, C200, C220, C230, C240, C270, C280, C300, C320, C230K, C350, Coupe

Analog speedo versus Digital readout

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 12-03-2002 | 08:28 PM
  #1  
amdeutsch's Avatar
Thread Starter
Administrator
MBWorld Ambassador
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 15,731
Likes: 30
From: www.Traben-Trarbach.de
MPG+ ROLFCOPTER
Analog speedo versus Digital readout

Funny thing I noticed driving on the by-pass loop tonite.

My digital readout is anywhere from 1 - 2 mph higher than my speedo and its needle. Anybody else notice this on their car.
The dealer, of course, tells me not to worry and to go by the digital which I don't have selected as my default settings.

Thanx for the feedback.

P.S.
I know that they both use the same pickup but are processed independently.
Old 12-03-2002 | 08:59 PM
  #2  
Lynn's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,744
Likes: 1
I have a one mph disagreement also. I don't remember which way it is. I never use the digital speedometer.
Old 12-03-2002 | 09:08 PM
  #3  
rrf's Avatar
rrf
Super Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 711
Likes: 1
Pretty accurate

Since 1 MPH is the minimum resolution of both meters 1 MPH is darn good. You will probably find that the digital is more accurate.

I calibrated mine 5 ways at 50:
Analog Speedo
Digital Speedo
ODBII Scanner
Police Radar Display
GPS

Then I calibrated 4 ways at 100
Analog Speedo
Digital Speedo
ODBII Scanner
GPS

All were same except Analog was 1/2 to 1mph off, but repeatable.


Your tires will make some difference.
Old 12-03-2002 | 09:24 PM
  #4  
tberry's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 987
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
2002 C230 Coupe Black/Charcoal C5 C7 Auto
So I got new wheels and tires and according to an online calculator it should make 2-3mph different from my stock tires/wheels. Does the digital speedo compensate for this or not? Thanks.
Old 12-03-2002 | 09:39 PM
  #5  
Matt230K's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,145
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
2010 C300 4matic
The digital readout is more likely to be accurate. There is some law about speedometers I read about last year. The regular speedo has to read slightly above the actual speed, I guess because differences in tire pressure could make it read below actual speed. And this is not allowed. I guess there must be no chance of it ever going below the actual speed.

But trip computers can be dead on accurate, and usually are pretty close. I guess the digital readout is allowed the same.
Old 12-04-2002 | 11:16 AM
  #6  
MB-BOB's Avatar
Admin Alumni
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,143
Likes: 18
See Garage
My analog gauge and digital speedometers are in perfect sync, at least at normal traffic speeds (5-80mph). I have even pointed this out to friends to illustrate the "precision" of German engineering. But after reading this, perhaps I should conclude I'm just lucky.
Old 12-04-2002 | 11:20 AM
  #7  
TimmyC230boy's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,924
Likes: 1
From: Sitting behind thing freakin desk of mine. Dreaming I was playing my Taylors, and driving my Benz. Long Live The VRAA!!!!!!
C230 Sports Coupe
I was cruising at 120 last night and the analog said 120 and digital said 119. close enough for me.

For those of you that have ever driving at those speed for a sustained time, a minute or more, is it just me or do you go into a "zone" like sly stallon did in driven? I did

Last edited by TimmyC230boy; 12-04-2002 at 11:24 AM.
Old 12-04-2002 | 11:20 AM
  #8  
truelove's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,750
Likes: 0
From: Peoria IL
2003 MB C230 coupe
mine are in perfect sync also

TimmyC230boy, i think you meant that the digital read 119 not 199
Old 12-04-2002 | 11:25 AM
  #9  
TimmyC230boy's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,924
Likes: 1
From: Sitting behind thing freakin desk of mine. Dreaming I was playing my Taylors, and driving my Benz. Long Live The VRAA!!!!!!
C230 Sports Coupe
Originally posted by truelove79
TimmyC230boy, i think you meant that the digital read 119 not 199
Fixed Thanks
Tim
Old 12-04-2002 | 11:25 AM
  #10  
MB-BOB's Avatar
Admin Alumni
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,143
Likes: 18
See Garage
Naw, it's 199. He was in his "zone." LOL!

EDIT: Aw shucks, Timmy, you took away my dream and changed it. And I was having so much fun, too!

Last edited by MB-BOB; 12-04-2002 at 11:27 AM.
Old 12-04-2002 | 11:27 AM
  #11  
Lynn's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,744
Likes: 1
Officer: Sir, do you know how fast you were going?

Driver: 190? 195?

Officer: Sir, you were going 52 in a 45 zone.

Old 12-04-2002 | 11:35 AM
  #12  
MB-BOB's Avatar
Admin Alumni
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 8,143
Likes: 18
See Garage
Really, Officer? (As he looks at the $50 bill in his hand). Um, are you sure it wasn't 195?

Some of those NASCAR TV ads are pretty cute...
Old 12-04-2002 | 11:36 AM
  #13  
session's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 8,189
Likes: 1
From: SF
2007 VW GTI
Originally posted by Lynn
Officer: Sir, do you know how fast you were going?

Driver: 190? 195?

Officer: Sir, you were going 52 in a 45 zone.
*hands the officer a $20*

Driver: Are you sure it wasn't 190? *wink*
Old 12-04-2002 | 11:42 AM
  #14  
Lynn's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,744
Likes: 1
LOL, great minds think alike.
Old 12-04-2002 | 12:02 PM
  #15  
tberry's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 987
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
2002 C230 Coupe Black/Charcoal C5 C7 Auto
UMMM hate to say but the fact that your analog and digital speedo read pretty much the same (1mph) could mean that the digital is reading off the same thing as the analog and not seperate signal/sensor. B/C when I got the rims/tire changed the two speedo still read the same (even though my actually speed is supposed to be about 3mph off) which mean the digital speedo is just a gimicky display to fill up on the menu. If they DO read different signals then my digital should display a different speed then the analog.

*I've seen the Gumball3000 clips of Ruf Turbo doing about 200+mph on digital readout and its diff from the analog indicating diff. signal read (accurate)
Old 12-04-2002 | 12:12 PM
  #16  
revstriker's Avatar
Out Of Control!!
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 12,161
Likes: 1
From: Obama Land
K Car
Originally posted by Matt230K
The digital readout is more likely to be accurate. There is some law about speedometers I read about last year. The regular speedo has to read slightly above the actual speed, I guess because differences in tire pressure could make it read below actual speed. And this is not allowed. I guess there must be no chance of it ever going below the actual speed.

But trip computers can be dead on accurate, and usually are pretty close. I guess the digital readout is allowed the same.
I too remember reading an article about this. It said that most manufactures calibrate the speedometer higher than the actual speed. They even compared the difference between car manufactures.
Old 12-04-2002 | 12:43 PM
  #17  
tberry's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 987
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
2002 C230 Coupe Black/Charcoal C5 C7 Auto
Originally posted by revstriker
I too remember reading an article about this. It said that most manufactures calibrate the speedometer higher than the actual speed. They even compared the difference between car manufactures.
Yes i vaguely rem this article as well and surprisingly the American auto manf. (GM I believe) were the most accurate (or should I say closest to actual speed).
Old 12-04-2002 | 01:55 PM
  #18  
Matt230K's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,145
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
2010 C300 4matic
Originally posted by revstriker
I too remember reading an article about this. It said that most manufactures calibrate the speedometer higher than the actual speed. They even compared the difference between car manufactures.
It was in either Car and Driver or Motor Trend. I get both of those. And I think they all do it, because it is the law. They have to be a certain percentage over or something. Maybe I can find the article one of these days.
Old 12-04-2002 | 02:11 PM
  #19  
FrankW's Avatar
MBworld Guru
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 22,007
Likes: 6
From: Diamond Bar, CA
white and whiter
the analog speedo has about 4% of difference at 70 mph for MB. BMW has almost 7% difference, and VW/Audi has about only 2%.

the last time i was driving at the 155 limit. the analog shows close to 160.
Old 12-04-2002 | 05:11 PM
  #20  
todd's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 206
Likes: 1
From: Burbank
C230K
After moving from stock 17" C7s to 18" Moda R6s I recalibrated the tire size in COMAND (size plus tread depth).

Anyone know, does this calibrate (adjust algorithms for) the speedo displays.

After switching it seemed like my system computed gas mileage as lower but this was just an impression and I have no data to substantiate it.
Old 12-04-2002 | 06:27 PM
  #21  
amdeutsch's Avatar
Thread Starter
Administrator
MBWorld Ambassador
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 15,731
Likes: 30
From: www.Traben-Trarbach.de
MPG+ ROLFCOPTER
Lucky for you guys with the matching set.

I think I'm going to find me a nice cop, one that likes to do community service and not one that tries to sublement his income, and ask him if he wouldn't mind helping me out.

And you "CANNONBALLERS", you know who you are.... can I borrow your '*****' some times? Driving this fast on american highways which aren't built for these speeds, with little ole ladies doing 40 down the center lane...... LOL

Last edited by amdeutsch; 12-04-2002 at 06:32 PM.
Old 12-04-2002 | 07:43 PM
  #22  
todd's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 206
Likes: 1
From: Burbank
C230K
Originally posted by amdeutsch
And you "CANNONBALLERS", you know who you are.... can I borrow your '*****' some times? Driving this fast on american highways which aren't built for these speeds, with little ole ladies doing 40 down the center lane...... LOL
The only way I can do it in a car now was from all of the life-threatening situations I made it through for years on a motorcycle.

You learn to realy be aware of what other people are doing when you got nothing between you and them but Levis ;-)
Old 12-04-2002 | 07:51 PM
  #23  
amdeutsch's Avatar
Thread Starter
Administrator
MBWorld Ambassador
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 15,731
Likes: 30
From: www.Traben-Trarbach.de
MPG+ ROLFCOPTER
Hey, I got no problem driving on the Autobahn. Take out Sissy's car once a year. What scares me are the peolple over here who only pay attention only to whats in front of them, NOT beside them, NOT behind them or think they own the road, doing below the speed limit and/or conditions, and think they are IT and everybody else better toe the line. Now that is scrary.
Old 12-04-2002 | 08:02 PM
  #24  
FrankW's Avatar
MBworld Guru
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 22,007
Likes: 6
From: Diamond Bar, CA
white and whiter
Originally posted by todd
After moving from stock 17" C7s to 18" Moda R6s I recalibrated the tire size in COMAND (size plus tread depth).

Anyone know, does this calibrate (adjust algorithms for) the speedo displays.

After switching it seemed like my system computed gas mileage as lower but this was just an impression and I have no data to substantiate it.
No, that does not calibrate the speedo. the calibration on the command system is for the accuracy of the navigation.
Old 12-05-2002 | 12:37 PM
  #25  
todd's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 206
Likes: 1
From: Burbank
C230K
Ok, that makes sense.

BTW, just a side note, I checked and my analog/digital speeds are reading spot on the same. Wether they are both my actual speed or not is another question.

But then, larger circumferance tires would make my car think it is moving slower, MPH wize, wouldn't it?

So my milage would read lower then actual as would my speed, no?

Ahhh f it. Just step on the pedal ;-)


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Analog speedo versus Digital readout



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:43 AM.