C-Class (W203) 2001-2007, C160, C180, C200, C220, C230, C240, C270, C280, C300, C320, C230K, C350, Coupe

C-Class (S203/W203) 4MATIC thread - All you want to know

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rating: Thread Rating: 3 votes, 4.67 average.
 
Old 05-21-2004, 08:57 PM
  #176  
Junior Member
 
KaMLuNg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Belleville, NJ
Posts: 15
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i really gotta check that out... my C240 4 matic at 80 mph sits at 3000 rpm... well i will be heading down to AC this weekend w/ it.. its the first roadtrip in the benz so ill get to see the miles i can get... that sits weird tho...
Old 05-21-2004, 09:10 PM
  #177  
Newbie
 
LarsCA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Got a 2002 C230 Coupe and it consistently average 26 MPG.
Old 05-21-2004, 11:08 PM
  #178  
Super Member
 
TNblkc230wz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 687
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
C320 Coupe
My C320 gets 22.2 MPG in city driving, short trips.
Old 05-22-2004, 05:12 PM
  #179  
Member
 
Junbug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Windy City
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2004 C230W
Mileage

I have a C230 Komp Sedan with about 9000 miles on it.

I am getting about 19 to 22 mpg average actual (depending on the amount of city / highway driving) using the odometer and how much gas the car takes.

It seems like everyone with the Komp engine is getting better mileage than mine???
Old 05-22-2004, 08:13 PM
  #180  
Super Member
 
BruNo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: PHILIPPINES
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
07' ML350
my C240 consumes 1Liter per 3kilometers, and the best mileage i get is 1Liter per 5-6kilometers. City driving,stop and go all the time,average speed of 20km/h.
Old 05-23-2004, 06:50 PM
  #181  
Newbie
 
LarsCA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When trying to convert that into MPG, I get 7 MPG. It sounded incredible at first, then I read that you average 20 km/h (12.4 MPH) so I guess maybe it's correct. Sound like you should looking into taking the subway or get a bike or something.

JUNBUG, sounds to me that something's not right with your car. Perhaps you should tell the mechanic next time your car is up for service and see if they might track down the culprit (unless you're a lead foot).
Old 05-24-2004, 08:45 AM
  #182  
Senior Member
 
vimzin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
06 E55 current, M5 Sold, C32 Sold, 330xi Sold
I have the C240 4 matic as a loaner right now and i got 300 miles on the full tank.. I was pushing the car hard after all it is a loaner lol..
Old 05-24-2004, 03:14 PM
  #183  
Senior Member
 
Felix's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Paderborn (Germany)
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C-Class
the 240 consumes more fuel than the 320, that is no mistery. even in the official MB-brochures this is stated. sorry, but the 2.6liter V6 is the worst MB-engine (concernering fuel-consumption) at the moment.
Old 07-24-2004, 02:05 PM
  #184  
Newbie
 
dllams's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How's the traction on the non 4MATIC C-Class?

Anyone ever get stuck?
Old 07-24-2004, 07:22 PM
  #185  
Super Member
 
Steve Clark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Oregon
Posts: 757
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C32AMG
Traction issues?

It just won't hook up at the dragstrip.
Old 07-24-2004, 09:06 PM
  #186  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Rick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 1,480
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
C230K Coupe/Orion/C4/C5/CD/AMG Spoiler/V60/TeleAid, 2 MGB's
I have 4matic in my E320, and after multiple trips to Lake Placid, Albany/Troy NY and Montreal, Quebec, Canadaduring the winter, it's never left me stuck in the snow. Additionally, it's great in rain and even after rain when that fine film of oil contaminates covers the road surfaces.
As Steve pointed out, it won't hook up for burn outs...but then, as I've said often...Mercedes (and most other luxury cars) aren't built to drag race.
Old 07-25-2004, 01:18 AM
  #187  
Super Member
 
preyx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Orange Co., CA, USA
Posts: 577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'02 C230K Coupe
For an explanation of how 4matic compares to other AWD systems, here's a description of the current systems in use today posted in another forum:
Torsen (Audi Quattro)
Audi’s system that forms Quattro (the only exception to this rule is the TT, which uses Haldex, which is something entirely else) uses Torsen, which was developed by the Gleason company from the States. It’s a pretty clever, but pretty basic mechanism that’s proven to be on of the better AWD designs (hence Audi’s success). Torsen stands for “torque-sensing” and it is in essence a pure mechanical LSD-based device (if memory serves me correct).

Inside a Torsen differential is a pair of worm gears and a worm wheel which are attached to the drive axles on the rear wheels. Torque can be transferred from the worm wheel to the worm gears, but not the other way around which prevents the car from slipping. In a normal situation, power is distributed just like a normal axle, however when one wheel starts to slip (where it spins faster than the other) the gears lock up so that the wheels spin at the same time. Normally when wheels start slipping, torque is directed to the wheel that’s spinning – this prevents that, helping to restore control.

There are three main benefits to Torsen: because it’s all mechanical, it reacts instantly, so there’s no delay. Secondly, the characteristics of the differential’s lockup is linear, and thirdly is that it is a permanent AWD system. Usually Torsen cars are biased at 50:50 but other ratios can be applied (note how I said normally; Torsen cars vary when the wheels start to slip) depending on the angles of the worm gears. Although Audi isn’t the only manufacturer to use it though – the older Toyota Celica GT-Four used it and so does the Hummer. As does the VW Passat, I think.

Viscous Coupling Porsche (911), Lamborghini Diablo VT, Volvo 850 AWD
Another popular form of 4WD on road cars is delivered through a Viscous Coupling system. What a Viscous Coupling is, is… well, as the name says a place that’s sticky where things are coupled. In this case it’s the drive shafts for the front and rear of the car. Imagine if you will, a container with an input shaft, and an output shaft. Inside this box are circular plates positioned close to each other, with half the plates from the input shaft, and half from the output shaft. The box is filled with a viscous liquid and then sealed.

The idea of the system is that if there is any difference in the turning speeds between the two shafts, the viscous liquid will transfer the difference in speed limiting slip. Normally, when the car’s driving in stable conditions where there is no slip, the front and rear axles run at the same speed, however when there’s slip, power will be transmitted from the faster driveshaft to the slower driveshaft via the liquid.

Please note that this is NOT an AWD system, rather a part time 4WD system. In regular conditions where there is no slip, no torque will be sent to the opposite car. This has advantages and disadvantages. If you have a regular RWD car and add Viscous Coupling to it, it will act like a RWD car (which is good), until it starts to slip whereupon it will become 4WD (also good, which is why the Porsche 911 Carrera 4 is so successful). However, in an FWD car, it really serves no other purpose other than to provide traction as it cannot correct understeer. Also, because the system relies on a viscous fluid to pick up slack, the system doesn’t react as quick as Torsen or others.

Usually, you will find this sort of AWD on mass production cars as it’s really cheap. It’s kind of effective. Kind of.

Active Differential – Broad term. Read. (Benz 4Matic, Nissan Skyline GT-R, Porsche PSK
Active differential is probably the most complicated sort of AWD system available. You can get it simple or complicated, but it relies a lot on computer gadgetry to tell the car about tires lip, and other crap like that. (Not really crap, but … yeah. Some cars, such as Porsche 959’s sensors included the throttle, turbo boost, steering angle and g-force to determine when and what degree the car’s torque bias should be between front and rear wheels).

It all starts out with a multi-plate clutch (a key difference between it and most other AWD systems). It isn’t a part of the transmission; rather it’s something separate… a sort of a differential clutch. Within the clutch are several plates, depending on the complexity of the AWD system and other parameters such as the power of the car, or its purpose, and an actuator that uses hydraulic power.

We’ll use six plates as an example as it’s an easy number to work with. The driveshaft hooked up to the front wheels gets two plates, and the rear driveshaft gets two plates, while there are two friction plates which rotate freely of the front and back. The purpose of these two discs is to lock up, and transmit power. RWD example: lock up one plate, and a little bit of power goes to the front; 2 plates, a little more power; 3 plates, 4 plates… so on so forth until all plates are locked up, whereupon a 50:50 split is made. This is all decided upon by the computer. Also note that this split also goes on even in cases of NO SLIP so that traction on dry pavement is optimized.

If there is slip, it works just like any other AWD system, directing power to the axles that need it, thus getting keeping your **** right side up and out of the ditches.

With this sort of system on board, and modern technology, nearly anything can be sensed. I know that Nissan’s ATTESA E-TS PRO used in the Skyline GT-R (R34) had a system that monitored G-Force, Boost pressure, throttle position and the speed of the individual wheels (via an ABS sensor) to see whether or not the car was running within its cornering limits. This is what allows the R-34 GT-R to powerslide smoothly.

Benz has a similar system on their 4Matic cars. It’s probably the dumbest thing that I’ve ever heard of, simply because it really could have been replaced by something better. The thing is, it works only in part time, so in normal conditions, the clutches are disengaged making it RWD. However when the computer’s sensors detect slip in the rear wheels, the clutch plates engage progressively to transfer torque. Why’s it dumb? Because a Viscous coupling could do the same job and cost thousands less.

Haldex - Volkswagen 4Motion, Volvo AWD
So what is Haldex? Well, it’s an active differential, but it’s been simplified to be more reliable and less costly to manufacture. Developed by Swedish firm Haldex, and controlled by software from Steyr-Daimler-Puch, it became an immediate success for its many advantages and simplicity in the Volkswagen Group, eventually being taken up by Volvo.

The Haldex unit consists of a multi-plate clutch that sits in an oil bath. These clutch plates are actuated hydraulically and are used to distribute power equally to the front and rear end of the car in normal conditions, however if needs be up to 100% of the torque can be sent to either the front or rear axle.

Because of its less complicated drive and its less complex mechanics, it can be put in less expensive cars. It works just as quickly as an active differential or Torsen, so there’s no real disadvantage in terms of time. I know that it’s not as good at Torsen for dealing with slippery situations, but it’s a pretty good alternative considering the savings in weight.

Oh, and the other thing is that its torque-holding ability. We’re not how sure it goes, but it can go reasonably high, proved by the 236 lb-ft R32 Golf / Audi TT 3.2 DSG / Audi A3 3.2, and 258 lb-ft Volvo S60/V70 R
Old 07-26-2004, 12:00 PM
  #188  
Newbie
 
vipulg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Midwest
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2002 Paprika C230 Coupe
NON 4matic

I have been driving c240 since 2000 winter, never had any problem.
Been driving c230 coupe since last yr and no problem in the winter.
IOWA winters are pretty bad BTW
Old 07-26-2004, 07:41 PM
  #189  
Member
 
fasteddie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2001 ML320 E, 2003 C230K Sport Sedan
Originally Posted by dllams
Anyone ever get stuck?

Have you ever tried a Merc in the winter with a set of winter tires. Generally much safer than most FWD cars. I live in Ottawa ON, and have snow about 4 months a year, with lots of Ice. The 4-matic would be a cool feature to have....but I can do without it.

IMHO - Now if my daughter were going for a trip, in a snow storm, to a distant rural area; that would be good cause for 4-matic.

Ed.
Old 07-26-2004, 10:00 PM
  #190  
Senior Member
 
Kal Rubinson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: NYC + CT
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2002 C320 Sport Wagon
Smile

Originally Posted by dllams
Anyone ever get stuck?
Not yet.

Kal
Old 07-29-2004, 05:41 PM
  #191  
Nas
Member
 
Nas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ML320
C320 4MATIC ?'s

Hey Guys,

For those of you who have a 2005 C320 4Matic (or even a few years older), I got a few questions. We might be looking at another car to get soon. Not sure yet. We currently have an ML320 (which we will be keeping).


I was wondering, how well does it handle in the winter? Is it necessary to get snow tires? Our ML320 has handled exceptionally well in some pretty bad snow on All Season Tires. I know that the C class is no SUV, but I was just wondering how it would do in a few inches of snow (on all seasons)?

Also, I remember that the stats said that the ML was 0-60 mph at 9 seconds. However this car feels so much faster, and a lot more powerful than what the numbers imply. How is the C320 in terms of acceleration? Do you have to step on the gas pretty hard? We currently have an ES330 which is rated to have more horsepower and torque (I think), but it seems very sluggish. Our ML, being an SUV, and having a less powerful engine seems a lot faster and potent. Thus, my questioning and hopeful optimism on the C320's performance. Also, how is the handling with the additional AWD?

In addition, what big changes are there for the 05 model year? I hear there is a revised interior. Are there pictures of this?

Thank You all for your feedback.
Old 07-29-2004, 05:48 PM
  #192  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
CitronC230K_03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: San Diego, Ca
Posts: 7,737
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2003 Citron Green C230KMT
revised interior indeed. check out mbusa.com for pics of the new interior. also you can search this thread for 05 interior pics.
Old 07-29-2004, 06:56 PM
  #193  
Administrator

 
amdeutsch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: www.Traben-Trarbach.de
Posts: 15,726
Received 30 Likes on 24 Posts
MPG+ ROLFCOPTER
Originally Posted by Nas
Hey Guys,

For those of you who have a 2005 C320 4Matic (or even a few years older), I got a few questions.
Thank You all for your feedback.
Ask Alboston. He is a mod on here.
Old 07-29-2004, 09:07 PM
  #194  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Kar don's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: GMT -8 hours
Posts: 5,640
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
Mercedes-Benz
Originally Posted by amdeutsch
Ask Alboston. He is a mod on here.

haha yes he is . Ok, Seeing how I own both the ML and C 4matic I think I can help you . The C-class feels quite peppy, more so than the ES300 (never drove the 330s) loaners i got when I used to have the lexus. The quality of the car compared to the ES300 is superior (however I love the dimming footwell lighting of the ES300), the C-class feels like a "heavier" car and has a more solid chassis, again imo. Regarding snow performance, we have michelin 16 inch all season on the car and has always performed excellent in poor conditions. The 4matic is seamless imo, quite a bit smoother than the ML. In regards to your comments about ES300 vs ML, yes the ML does seem a little more energetic, the lexus felt very lazy and the one i drove made a gurgling noise under full throttle, not very pleasant. I think the C320, esp with the new 05 interior will be a great upgrade for you! Good luck.
Old 07-29-2004, 09:29 PM
  #195  
Nas
Member
 
Nas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ML320
Alboston,

Thanks so much for your input. I find it very insightful.

Do you find the 4MATIC great for the curves? We test drove an A4 a while back, and that thing was sticking to the road like glue. I would assume the 4MATIC have a Quattro like effect.

It's good to know that you find it's effect on the snow very well. I assume it does well on a few inches of snow in hilly areas.

In terms of performance, it seems like it will be peppy like the ML (since they have the same engine). Just to make sure, you don't really have to floor it, to get that performance, do you?

Thanks a lot for your reply. I found it very helpful. Haha, it's also good that you have driven all those cars, to give a good assessment.
Old 07-29-2004, 11:29 PM
  #196  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Kar don's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: GMT -8 hours
Posts: 5,640
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
Mercedes-Benz
Originally Posted by Nas
Alboston,

Thanks so much for your input. I find it very insightful.

Do you find the 4MATIC great for the curves? We test drove an A4 a while back, and that thing was sticking to the road like glue. I would assume the 4MATIC have a Quattro like effect.

It's good to know that you find it's effect on the snow very well. I assume it does well on a few inches of snow in hilly areas.

In terms of performance, it seems like it will be peppy like the ML (since they have the same engine). Just to make sure, you don't really have to floor it, to get that performance, do you?

Thanks a lot for your reply. I found it very helpful. Haha, it's also good that you have driven all those cars, to give a good assessment.

haha no prob man, no u dont have to floor the C... in fact i have never really floored it lol. It holds pretty well on corners, but cant really compete with my BMW.... i guess its cuz the benz has all season tires on it. It does just great on snowy hilly roads, if you want that extra traction go for snow tires but i dont think its needed. I have put 11k miles on the car and it has been flawless! I love it.
Old 08-21-2004, 02:20 PM
  #197  
Super Member
 
Pit-Pony's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2015 C63S E1 (sold 2012 C63 AMG Sedan (Premium & APX)) & 09 C300 Sport 4Matic
2005 C240 4MATIC vs non

Any difference in driving or power or sterring between the 2005 C240 & the C240 4Matic?

Does it fel like the same car?

I'm trading a 2001 C240 and wonder if the new 4Matic will feal more sluggish.

Havn't had one available to test drive.

..jack
Old 08-27-2004, 08:41 PM
  #198  
Senior Member
 
jago1244's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: long island , ny
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
2016 G63 ; 981 boxster GTS
Question is AMG trim avail on 4MATIC?

hi all,
over from w210 board, thinking of trading over to c320...local dlr says i cant get the amg body trim (that comes on SS) on a 4matic.
anyone here know fer sure??
thanks , j.
Old 08-27-2004, 10:09 PM
  #199  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Rick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 1,480
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
C230K Coupe/Orion/C4/C5/CD/AMG Spoiler/V60/TeleAid, 2 MGB's
This might take a "one time special order fee" plus the cost of the 4matic. Remember, the 4matic option adds about 380lbs to the weight of the car, and raises the suspension in the front and back...so I'm not sure if it can be done with the AMG or SportSedan suspensions. Personally, if it is possible, I'd like to see them do a C55 AMG with 4matic.

Last edited by Rick; 08-28-2004 at 07:44 AM.
Old 08-28-2004, 01:02 AM
  #200  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Sauceboy01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,036
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Blimp
Originally Posted by Rick
This might take a "one time special order fee" plus the cost of the 4matic. Remember, the 4matic option adds about 380lbs to the weight of the car, and raises the suspension in the front and back...so I'm not sure if it can be done with the AMG or SportSedan suspensions. Personally, if it is possible. I'd like to see them do a C55 AMG with 4matic. :-)

ooooooh, C55 4matic..

jizzzzz..

-Danny


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 3 votes, 4.67 average.

Quick Reply: C-Class (S203/W203) 4MATIC thread - All you want to know



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:26 AM.