C230 Sedan confirmed for US!
#76
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 7,587
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
E320
I'd much rather get a V6, 4 seats, and better performance. The C240 should be upgraded to better compete with the 325's. MB definitely needs to hit the young crowd more.
The C230 is much more of a niche market. It's a 2 seater. Unless a household has other alternate cars to drive, most will pass up on it. It has very little practicality.
And just the fact that it's a V4, even if it's made to out-perform the 325's, just won't pull the would-be bmw customers away.
MB needs a serious BMW 325 contender.
The C230 is much more of a niche market. It's a 2 seater. Unless a household has other alternate cars to drive, most will pass up on it. It has very little practicality.
And just the fact that it's a V4, even if it's made to out-perform the 325's, just won't pull the would-be bmw customers away.
MB needs a serious BMW 325 contender.
#77
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Ohio
Posts: 3,145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2010 C300 4matic
Originally posted by MacPhisto
If anyone has anything that would even suggest that MB is concerned about C class sales (and is in fact not absolutely delighted with it's sales), or with C240 sales, I'd like to see it.
Otherwise, just making things up isn't very useful.
If anyone has anything that would even suggest that MB is concerned about C class sales (and is in fact not absolutely delighted with it's sales), or with C240 sales, I'd like to see it.
Otherwise, just making things up isn't very useful.
I doubt they are getting rid of the C240, but I hope they at least build fewer of them, so as to replace some of them with C230's. But if they increase production of the C-class line as a whole by introducing a new model, many dealers will have a lot of problems with overstock. In 2000, my dealer hardly had more than 10 C-classes at any one time. Right now, there are about 35 C-classes on the lot.
#78
MBworld Guru
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Diamond Bar, CA
Posts: 22,007
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
white and whiter
Originally posted by oggle
I'd much rather get a V6, 4 seats, and better performance. The C240 should be upgraded to better compete with the 325's. MB definitely needs to hit the young crowd more.
The C230 is much more of a niche market. It's a 2 seater. Unless a household has other alternate cars to drive, most will pass up on it. It has very little practicality.
And just the fact that it's a V4, even if it's made to out-perform the 325's, just won't pull the would-be bmw customers away.
MB needs a serious BMW 325 contender.
I'd much rather get a V6, 4 seats, and better performance. The C240 should be upgraded to better compete with the 325's. MB definitely needs to hit the young crowd more.
The C230 is much more of a niche market. It's a 2 seater. Unless a household has other alternate cars to drive, most will pass up on it. It has very little practicality.
And just the fact that it's a V4, even if it's made to out-perform the 325's, just won't pull the would-be bmw customers away.
MB needs a serious BMW 325 contender.
anyway, oggle we're comparing between C230K sedan (if it does make it into the states) and the C240 sedan.
i guess what everyone wants to see is that MB up the horses in the C240 to compete with the 325 and A4 1.8T.
#79
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: May 2002
Location: The blue white rock, third out.
Posts: 2,916
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2002 C230 Coupe(M111)
Originally posted by oggle
I'd much rather get a V6, 4 seats, and better performance. The C240 should be upgraded to better compete with the 325's. MB definitely needs to hit the young crowd more.
The C230 is much more of a niche market. It's a 2 seater. Unless a household has other alternate cars to drive, most will pass up on it. It has very little practicality.
And just the fact that it's a V4, even if it's made to out-perform the 325's, just won't pull the would-be bmw customers away.
MB needs a serious BMW 325 contender.
I'd much rather get a V6, 4 seats, and better performance. The C240 should be upgraded to better compete with the 325's. MB definitely needs to hit the young crowd more.
The C230 is much more of a niche market. It's a 2 seater. Unless a household has other alternate cars to drive, most will pass up on it. It has very little practicality.
And just the fact that it's a V4, even if it's made to out-perform the 325's, just won't pull the would-be bmw customers away.
MB needs a serious BMW 325 contender.
There is no such beast. Its an inline 4...V4s are general reserved for high end(high price, but not the highest performance) sportbikes. The 1.8L and the 2.3L Supercharged motors have better performance across the board compared to the 2.6L V6
Niche vehicle? Oggle, how many households have just one EXPENSIVE car as the sole transportation? I don't want a sedan. I prefer the smaller size and sleeker shape of the two door. I have four cars. And two motorcycles. Which do I drive the most? My C230K...I love it.
And its a four seater, not two as you stated.
A C230 sedan is great idea. Bring it.
Last edited by Outland; 12-15-2002 at 11:01 PM.
#80
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver Island, B.C. Canada
Posts: 1,377
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2005 smart cabrio; 2008 Mercedes-Benz B 200
V-4
Originally posted by Outland
A V4, Gracie? There is no such beast. Its an inline 4...V4s are general reserved for high end(high price, but not the highest performance) sportbikes.
A V4, Gracie? There is no such beast. Its an inline 4...V4s are general reserved for high end(high price, but not the highest performance) sportbikes.
#81
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: May 2002
Location: The blue white rock, third out.
Posts: 2,916
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2002 C230 Coupe(M111)
Re: V-4
Originally posted by Mike T.
I hate to be a pedant , but maybe you should ask Saab, Ford Germany and Lancia if there were V-4 engines in cars.
I hate to be a pedant , but maybe you should ask Saab, Ford Germany and Lancia if there were V-4 engines in cars.
As far as MB goes, there never was nor is there now a V4 MB engine
I hope.
I think so...
#82
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Houston,TX-moving to The Woodlands,TX SOON!!!
Posts: 1,990
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Toyota Tacoma & Lexus IS250
Originally posted by Vince
what will this do to c240 sales? Will it be priced more or less than the 240? Seeing that the 230K engine (1.8 and 2.3) is far superiour to the 240, will they just drop the 240 all together?
what will this do to c240 sales? Will it be priced more or less than the 240? Seeing that the 230K engine (1.8 and 2.3) is far superiour to the 240, will they just drop the 240 all together?
I'd like to see that comparison...
a C230 sedan with a decent sport pkg (C7 wheels) versus the 325i.
Last edited by bagwell; 12-16-2002 at 10:19 AM.
#83
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 2,465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2002 C230 K
One thing that no one has mentioned is that it really doesn't cost MB anything to add this engine to the line-up. The motor will bolt right in - why not add a little more choice to the line-up? Comparing the power/performance characteristics of the W202 version of the C230K sedan to the W202 C280 shows that in the past MB has had no problem in the past producing cars that are quite similar.
My guess is that a C230K sedan will priced slightly less than the C240 (which may get beefed up a little in the future, considering that the C320 is supposed to become a C350 for 2004).
Cheers, BT
My guess is that a C230K sedan will priced slightly less than the C240 (which may get beefed up a little in the future, considering that the C320 is supposed to become a C350 for 2004).
Cheers, BT
#84
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Toronto, Ontario Canada
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2002 C240 Classic - Orion Blue Beast!!
We need to first detrmine if MB is putting the 1.8 or 2.3 engine in the sedan. I've seen both engines mentioned in this thread.
Bringing the 1.8 would make sense, but only as a stripper car. Kind of like the BMW e36 318. It makes an MB even more affordable than it already is.
But putting the 1.8/2.3 in the sedan with a sport package makes no sense. The problem MB has is that the 240 does not have as much power as a 325, and does not handle as well as a 325. They need to offer a serious sports package on the 240, as well as increase hp to 184. This will eliminate the need for a 230 sedan.
A 2.3 sedan will fail just as miserably at competing with a 325 as the 240. Why? Because it has a 4 cylinder engine. Perception is a greater force than reality. The reality is, the MB 4 bangers are great engines with good power. But the perception amongst North Americans is that four cylinders are slow and rough, even with published specs @ 189hp. And, why buy a 4 banger, when you can get a six (325) for the same price? It doesn't make sense to most people.
I know I would buy a 325 over a 230 sedan. On the other hand, if I was desperate to buy an MB and I couldn't afford a 240 or 320, I would buy the stripper 180 sedan with cloth interior, etc, just so I could have the three pointed star in my driveway.
And another thing ALL of you are forgetting is that MB drivers are different from BMW drivers. MB drivers want different things. They want luxury, and quietness, and smoothness. Bimmer drivers want more of a sporty feel etc. If MB starts altering the characteristics of their cars to start attracting bimmer drivers, then they will alienate their core customers. How is this good for business? Honestly, most of you guys do not belong here. You all should have bought bimmers. So many of you b*tch about how your MB does not handle well, is slow, blah, blah, blah. Why didn't you just buy a BMW?
Bringing the 1.8 would make sense, but only as a stripper car. Kind of like the BMW e36 318. It makes an MB even more affordable than it already is.
But putting the 1.8/2.3 in the sedan with a sport package makes no sense. The problem MB has is that the 240 does not have as much power as a 325, and does not handle as well as a 325. They need to offer a serious sports package on the 240, as well as increase hp to 184. This will eliminate the need for a 230 sedan.
A 2.3 sedan will fail just as miserably at competing with a 325 as the 240. Why? Because it has a 4 cylinder engine. Perception is a greater force than reality. The reality is, the MB 4 bangers are great engines with good power. But the perception amongst North Americans is that four cylinders are slow and rough, even with published specs @ 189hp. And, why buy a 4 banger, when you can get a six (325) for the same price? It doesn't make sense to most people.
I know I would buy a 325 over a 230 sedan. On the other hand, if I was desperate to buy an MB and I couldn't afford a 240 or 320, I would buy the stripper 180 sedan with cloth interior, etc, just so I could have the three pointed star in my driveway.
And another thing ALL of you are forgetting is that MB drivers are different from BMW drivers. MB drivers want different things. They want luxury, and quietness, and smoothness. Bimmer drivers want more of a sporty feel etc. If MB starts altering the characteristics of their cars to start attracting bimmer drivers, then they will alienate their core customers. How is this good for business? Honestly, most of you guys do not belong here. You all should have bought bimmers. So many of you b*tch about how your MB does not handle well, is slow, blah, blah, blah. Why didn't you just buy a BMW?
Last edited by David N.; 12-16-2002 at 06:10 PM.
#85
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Vienna, Austria
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Audi S4
Originally posted by David N.
So many of you b*tch about how your MB does not handle well, is slow, blah, blah, blah. Why didn't you just buy a BMW?
So many of you b*tch about how your MB does not handle well, is slow, blah, blah, blah. Why didn't you just buy a BMW?
Also what's wrong with wanting an M-B to handle better? Is that an unreasonable wish?
#86
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Gaithersburg, MD
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2002 C240 6-spd (ret)
Originally posted by FrankW
btw, if the 1.8/2.3 WOULD be derided as inadequate and unworthy of the C sedan, then why was the W202 C230K (when it was introduced in 99) out selling the C280.
if MB agree with you, why did they put the 2.3K engine in their C-class. TWO years ago.
btw, if the 1.8/2.3 WOULD be derided as inadequate and unworthy of the C sedan, then why was the W202 C230K (when it was introduced in 99) out selling the C280.
if MB agree with you, why did they put the 2.3K engine in their C-class. TWO years ago.
I'm not surprised the C240 out-sells the 320. Same car, less HP, analog climate control. Excellent value for the $$$, plus until 2003, the only one w/ 6-spd. I bet the E320 out-sells the E500, SLK230 out-sells SLK320, etc, etc... People compromise to a certain extent and POWER is not always the overriding factor once you are out of the 16-29 age bracket
#87
MBworld Guru
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Diamond Bar, CA
Posts: 22,007
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
white and whiter
MarkL, you are right that there was no V6 back in the W202 era, oh wait there is 99-2000. Yes the V6 is smoother, but when you can have a 4 cyclinder engine that is more powerful and equally as efficient wouldn't you want it? I know i would. anyway it's all about personal preference.
btw I look at ES300/Windom just an overprice Camry.
don't forget we live in the US where people loves big engines. Through out Europe you'll find less cyclinder more efficient engines more popular.
Agree with you second statement.
btw I look at ES300/Windom just an overprice Camry.
don't forget we live in the US where people loves big engines. Through out Europe you'll find less cyclinder more efficient engines more popular.
Agree with you second statement.
#88
Originally posted by David N.
We need to first detrmine if MB is putting the 1.8 or 2.3 engine in the sedan. I've seen both engines mentioned in this thread.
Bringing the 1.8 would make sense, but only as a stripper car. Kind of like the BMW e36 318. It makes an MB even more affordable than it already is.
But putting the 2.3 in the sedan with a sport package makes no sense. The problem MB has is that the 240 does not have as much power as a 325, and does not handle as well as a 325. They need to offer a serious sports package on the 240, as well as increase hp to 184. This will eliminate the need for a 230 sedan.
A 2.3 sedan will fail just as miserably at competing with a 325 as the 240. Why? Because it has a 4 cylinder engine. Perception is a greater force than reality. The reality is, the MB 4 bangers are great engines with good power. But the perception amongst North Americans is that four cylinders are slow and rough, even with published specs @ 189hp. And, why buy a 4 banger, when you can get a six (325) for the same price? It doesn't make sense to most people.
I know I would buy a 325 over a 230 sedan. On the other hand, if I was desperate to buy an MB and I couldn't afford a 240 or 320, I would buy the stripper 180 sedan with cloth interior, etc, just so I could have the three pointed star in my driveway.
And another thing ALL of you are forgetting is that MB drivers are different from BMW drivers. MB drivers want different things. They want luxury, and quietness, and smoothness. Bimmer drivers want more of a sporty feel etc. If MB starts altering the characteristics of their cars to start attracting bimmer drivers, then they will alienate their core customers. How is this good for business? Honestly, most of you guys do not belong here. You all should have bought bimmers. So many of you b*tch about how your MB does not handle well, is slow, blah, blah, blah. Why didn't you just buy a BMW?
We need to first detrmine if MB is putting the 1.8 or 2.3 engine in the sedan. I've seen both engines mentioned in this thread.
Bringing the 1.8 would make sense, but only as a stripper car. Kind of like the BMW e36 318. It makes an MB even more affordable than it already is.
But putting the 2.3 in the sedan with a sport package makes no sense. The problem MB has is that the 240 does not have as much power as a 325, and does not handle as well as a 325. They need to offer a serious sports package on the 240, as well as increase hp to 184. This will eliminate the need for a 230 sedan.
A 2.3 sedan will fail just as miserably at competing with a 325 as the 240. Why? Because it has a 4 cylinder engine. Perception is a greater force than reality. The reality is, the MB 4 bangers are great engines with good power. But the perception amongst North Americans is that four cylinders are slow and rough, even with published specs @ 189hp. And, why buy a 4 banger, when you can get a six (325) for the same price? It doesn't make sense to most people.
I know I would buy a 325 over a 230 sedan. On the other hand, if I was desperate to buy an MB and I couldn't afford a 240 or 320, I would buy the stripper 180 sedan with cloth interior, etc, just so I could have the three pointed star in my driveway.
And another thing ALL of you are forgetting is that MB drivers are different from BMW drivers. MB drivers want different things. They want luxury, and quietness, and smoothness. Bimmer drivers want more of a sporty feel etc. If MB starts altering the characteristics of their cars to start attracting bimmer drivers, then they will alienate their core customers. How is this good for business? Honestly, most of you guys do not belong here. You all should have bought bimmers. So many of you b*tch about how your MB does not handle well, is slow, blah, blah, blah. Why didn't you just buy a BMW?
#89
MBworld Guru
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Diamond Bar, CA
Posts: 22,007
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
white and whiter
for David N.
MB is no longer producing the 2.3 four cyclinder engine (for the C-class at least). all the four cyclinder model now use the 1.8 s/c four cyclinder engine with different model different output of hp and torque.
so it's not whether the 2.3 or 1.8 is coming, but whether the C230k with the 1.8 s/c engine will be here or not.
MB is no longer producing the 2.3 four cyclinder engine (for the C-class at least). all the four cyclinder model now use the 1.8 s/c four cyclinder engine with different model different output of hp and torque.
so it's not whether the 2.3 or 1.8 is coming, but whether the C230k with the 1.8 s/c engine will be here or not.
#90
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Toronto, Ontario Canada
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2002 C240 Classic - Orion Blue Beast!!
Originally posted by FrankW
for David N.
MB is no longer producing the 2.3 four cyclinder engine (for the C-class at least). all the four cyclinder model now use the 1.8 s/c four cyclinder engine with different model different output of hp and torque.
so it's not whether the 2.3 or 1.8 is coming, but whether the C230k with the 1.8 s/c engine will be here or not.
for David N.
MB is no longer producing the 2.3 four cyclinder engine (for the C-class at least). all the four cyclinder model now use the 1.8 s/c four cyclinder engine with different model different output of hp and torque.
so it's not whether the 2.3 or 1.8 is coming, but whether the C230k with the 1.8 s/c engine will be here or not.
MB should focus on upping the 240.
#91
Former Vendor of MBWorld
It took me about an hour to read pages 1-9 of this thread.
I understand that the C230 Sedan will probally be comming out soon but i will never get why, The C230 sedan will not be that HUGE a difference over the C240 sedan, so i think its just a waste.
If for some reason a person loved the Kompressor engine then i think they should just get the C230 Coupe. If they need a 4 door then oh well, MB can not please everyone.
The C-Class will now have more engine options then any other Model in the MB family. To me it is Unnecessary for such a slight change in performance.
I understand that the C230 Sedan will probally be comming out soon but i will never get why, The C230 sedan will not be that HUGE a difference over the C240 sedan, so i think its just a waste.
If for some reason a person loved the Kompressor engine then i think they should just get the C230 Coupe. If they need a 4 door then oh well, MB can not please everyone.
The C-Class will now have more engine options then any other Model in the MB family. To me it is Unnecessary for such a slight change in performance.
#92
Super Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Agoura Hills, CA
Posts: 570
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
C230K
I hate to sound like an *******, but some of the relpies in here are just stupid. It's not going to cost MB anything to put in the 1.8L engine in the sedan. Have you guys heard of this one car that audi makes. It's called the A4. It too comes with a 1.8L engine, and sells very well. Here's an idea... Why not offer a better engine that mb has already developed to its existing lineup. Not only will this make existing customers who want more power over the 240, but can't afford the 320, happy, it will attract customers who may buy cars from the competitor (in this case Audi). More customers = more profits.
As far as bmw is concerned, the 230 engine is still better then the 325 engine. The 325 may be a little smoother but that's because it's an I6. Can't you still have a good ride with good performance (eg AMG). Who say's mb buyers don't want performance? I buy MB's, I want better performance. A lot of you guy's here buy MB and alot of you want better performance. The 240 is a smooth car, with very good entry level luxury, however it lacks in performance. Adding the 230 to the sedan will help narrow the performance deficit in the entry level line up. Now all MB needs to do is offer a "better" sport suspension. A car can still be very comfortable with a tight precise suspension (eg new BMW 7 series - my uncle let me drive his sitting on 20" BBS's. Handles great and very comfortable.).
As far as bmw is concerned, the 230 engine is still better then the 325 engine. The 325 may be a little smoother but that's because it's an I6. Can't you still have a good ride with good performance (eg AMG). Who say's mb buyers don't want performance? I buy MB's, I want better performance. A lot of you guy's here buy MB and alot of you want better performance. The 240 is a smooth car, with very good entry level luxury, however it lacks in performance. Adding the 230 to the sedan will help narrow the performance deficit in the entry level line up. Now all MB needs to do is offer a "better" sport suspension. A car can still be very comfortable with a tight precise suspension (eg new BMW 7 series - my uncle let me drive his sitting on 20" BBS's. Handles great and very comfortable.).
#93
Originally posted by Vince
As far as bmw is concerned, the 230 engine is still better then the 325 engine.
As far as bmw is concerned, the 230 engine is still better then the 325 engine.
The C230 engine . . . well . . . let's just say it isn't going to be winning any awards or acclaim.
Nothing wrong with arguing, but let's not get too carried away!
#94
Super Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Agoura Hills, CA
Posts: 570
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
C230K
Originally posted by MacPhisto
Umm, yeah, ok. The BMW 6 is widely acclaimed, and rightfully so, as one of the greatest automotive engines the world has ever seen.
The C230 engine . . . well . . . let's just say it isn't going to be winning any awards or acclaim.
Nothing wrong with arguing, but let's not get too carried away!
Umm, yeah, ok. The BMW 6 is widely acclaimed, and rightfully so, as one of the greatest automotive engines the world has ever seen.
The C230 engine . . . well . . . let's just say it isn't going to be winning any awards or acclaim.
Nothing wrong with arguing, but let's not get too carried away!
oh and since your always complaining about people not using any sources to back their info up...
330 engine not 325!!!
Another source
is this enough...
#95
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
C230 coupe 6sp
I drove a 325i and my 2.3 coupe felt faster. I didn't really notice much difference in "refinement", but the BMW transmission is quite a bit better than the rubbery, notchy transmission in my car. I think the 1.8K engine will be fine in a c class sedan. Then MB has a car to sell the younger buyer looking for a sportier sedan, and the 240 to sell to their core clientele. Like I said earlier, MB has stated that they need to lower the average age of their buyers. It is in the mid 50's now and going up every year. So they have to come out with cars that attract younger buyers. A c class sedan with a 190hp supercharged engine and a decent sport package for under $30,000 would help them a lot.
#96
Originally posted by Vince
I hate to sound like an *******, but some of the relpies in here are just stupid. It's not going to cost MB anything to put in the 1.8L engine in the sedan. Have you guys heard of this one car that audi makes. It's called the A4. It too comes with a 1.8L engine, and sells very well. Here's an idea... Why not offer a better engine that mb has already developed to its existing lineup. Not only will this make existing customers who want more power over the 240, but can't afford the 320, happy, it will attract customers who may buy cars from the competitor (in this case Audi). More customers = more profits.
I hate to sound like an *******, but some of the relpies in here are just stupid. It's not going to cost MB anything to put in the 1.8L engine in the sedan. Have you guys heard of this one car that audi makes. It's called the A4. It too comes with a 1.8L engine, and sells very well. Here's an idea... Why not offer a better engine that mb has already developed to its existing lineup. Not only will this make existing customers who want more power over the 240, but can't afford the 320, happy, it will attract customers who may buy cars from the competitor (in this case Audi). More customers = more profits.
Last edited by potatobbq; 12-16-2002 at 07:57 PM.
#97
Originally posted by Vince
check your sources... the 6 they are refering to is the 330 engine, NOT the 325.
oh and since your always complaining about people not using any sources to back their info up...
330 engine not 325!!!
Another source
is this enough...
check your sources... the 6 they are refering to is the 330 engine, NOT the 325.
oh and since your always complaining about people not using any sources to back their info up...
330 engine not 325!!!
Another source
is this enough...
Although, having driven the BMW 323, 325, 328 and 330, I would say that the engines are all very similar in refinement - the 330 being the best mainly because it has the highest power.
And, that the 325 engine is still in a different class than the MB 1.8 or 2.3.
Nevertheless, kudos for making a good point.
#98
Originally posted by speedfrk
I drove a 325i and my 2.3 coupe felt faster. I didn't really notice much difference in "refinement",
I drove a 325i and my 2.3 coupe felt faster. I didn't really notice much difference in "refinement",
There is a huge difference between the BMW 325 engine and the 2.3 MB engine, as far as refinement (noise, vibration and harshness). Huge. Like comparing a sewing machine to a tractor.
#99
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Toronto, Ontario Canada
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2002 C240 Classic - Orion Blue Beast!!
Originally posted by Vince
I hate to sound like an *******, but some of the relpies in here are just stupid...
As far as bmw is concerned, the 230 engine is still better then the 325 engine.
I hate to sound like an *******, but some of the relpies in here are just stupid...
As far as bmw is concerned, the 230 engine is still better then the 325 engine.
Do you honestly believe that the 230 engine is better than the 325? BMW makes some of the very best 6 cylinder engines in the world. Who cares if Wards auto world didn't rank the the 2.5L I6. It is still one of the best. I would take it in a heartbeat over the 230. There is no comparison. Any coupe owner here would probably take that in an engine swap if it was a hassle free conversion.
The reason so many coupe owners here bought their cars and not a bimmer was because there are "too many bimmers on the road, I want something exclusive". Not, "man that 325 engine is one POS. And it handles like a POS too."
If BMW's were rare, everyone here would be lining up to buy one.
As for your rant about MB buyers wanting performance:
Traditional MB buyers want luxury. If they wanted performance, they'd buy a bimmer. Why should MB risk alienating their core customer base for a few snivelling little whiners who are happy with nothing and nit pick at everything?
The only reason people compare BMW and MB is because they are both German, and both sell cars in the same price ranges. Both offer totally different characteristics in their cars and pursue a totally different market of consumer.
#100
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
C230 coupe 6sp
I think there is a difference in refinement, but not a "huge" difference. Certain things bother certain people more than others, so I will take the extra power of the 2.3K engine over the 2.5 BMW engine and live with what I feel is a slight difference in refinement. Besides, the 2.3K engine is downright silky compared with my 5.9 V8 Dakota