finally dyno results of Kleemann alloy pulley kit vs stock
Brandon (Kleemann) and Randy (Renncpe) both recommended Stage II a few months ago. I don't know if anyone has done before/after dynos with stage II to prove either way if it provide more/less power, any changes in a/f ratio.
I think it's time for me to purchase my Kleemann pulley
Thanks for the info tberry
Regards,
Matt
I belive KLEEMANN and me posted that it was not necessary to change to step II almost a year ago.
Good Renntech could give us the answer to that.
I belive KLEEMANN and me posted that it was not necessary to change to step II almost a year ago.
KLEEMANN recommended Stage II or III for pulley users on 7/27/2002 in the tread "MB DAS Settings?" by edvpt who has a Kleemann pulley.
I recommended Stage II (and still do) to those people who are convienced that they need it (the linh's of the world). It wont hurt anything- and yes, the dynos will show a nice fat 12.5:1 AF but no power gain.
It's slightly to the lean side, but absolutely not dangerous.
You can drive that car with full throttle from today untill next Christmas, without any problems.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Lets put it this way:
I install a Kleemann pulley kit, I then have to option of leaving my fuel settings at stage 1 or (with little or no effort) have the option of going to the dealership and having them changed to stage 2. Which would be optimal and why?
KLEEMANN, your company obviously did rigorous testing prior to distributing this product. After all of those tests, which setting did the "KLEEMANN C23K" end up being left on? And why? Stage I or II.
I look forward to reading your responses.
Regards,
Matt
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
someone that knows about a/f ratios, can u please tell me if 13.9:1 is high for this car? i know nothing about it, i just dont want it to be to dangerous for my car when my pulley gets installed (hopefuly today). espesually since my dealer is not changing my fuel settings.
Now for the long explanation of why...
Stoichiometry is the term for the theoretical optimum mixture of elements for complete combustion.
For gasoline stoich turns out to be approx 14.7 a/f or the inverse .0680 f/a (which is what the engineering community uses). So for best efficiency this is where the engine likes to run and sure enough when we calibrate engines for part throttle operation we cal to .0680 f/a
For peak power, it turns out this number is different...
12.5 a/f, or the inverse .0800 f/a, is where it should be for peak power if, and it's a big if,exhaust gas temperature is not an issue...
So here's what happens in real life...
When an engine is calibrated during development peak power is run at .0800 f/a. this works fine until either; knock is encountered, or there is too much backpressure in the exhaust tract.
When knock is present spark timing has to be pulled out and when that is done the exhaust gas temperature (EGT) rises. When the EGT rises past critical levels (determined by the quality of the exhaust valves and other parts) the only way to cool things down is to add fuel.
Backpressure can also cause EGT to be too high and require fuel to be added to cool EGT, so you start at .0800 f/a and possibly go richer, but not leaner.
Now leaners mixtures, which produce more heat, cause knock to happen sooner (easier). More power (better cylinder filling) also lowers the knock threshold. You have both of these conditions with the pulley. If the engine knocks and if it has active knock sensors it will pull spark out and without extra fuel EGT would be too high. This also kills power so if you start with the correct amount of fuel you will make more power and reduce the tendency to knock.
13.9 is much too lean and is hurting power.
Supercharged (vs naturally aspirated) engines are not as sensitive to rich mixtures (under 12.5 a/f or over .0800 f/a) hurting power but are more sensitive to lean mixtures causing problems.
Now that being said, engines tolerate these conditions for short periods of time OK, which is why everyone has gotten away with it so far. If you go out on the freeway and run full throttle for more than a few minutes, your could easily do some damage.
ok, tired of typing, let the flames begin...
All right, since you asked the short answer is yes it is too lean.
Now for the long explanation of why...
Stoichiometry is the term for the theoretical optimum mixture of elements for complete combustion.
For gasoline stoich turns out to be approx 14.7 a/f or the inverse .0680 f/a (which is what the engineering community uses). So for best efficiency this is where the engine likes to run and sure enough when we calibrate engines for part throttle operation we cal to .0680 f/a
For peak power, it turns out this number is different...
12.5 a/f, or the inverse .0800 f/a, is where it should be for peak power if, and it's a big if,exhaust gas temperature is not an issue...
So here's what happens in real life...
When an engine is calibrated during development peak power is run at .0800 f/a. this works fine until either; knock is encountered, or there is too much backpressure in the exhaust tract.
When knock is present spark timing has to be pulled out and when that is done the exhaust gas temperature (EGT) rises. When the EGT rises past critical levels (determined by the quality of the exhaust valves and other parts) the only way to cool things down is to add fuel.
Backpressure can also cause EGT to be too high and require fuel to be added to cool EGT, so you start at .0800 f/a and possibly go richer, but not leaner.
Now leaners mixtures, which produce more heat, cause knock to happen sooner (easier). More power (better cylinder filling) also lowers the knock threshold. You have both of these conditions with the pulley. If the engine knocks and if it has active knock sensors it will pull spark out and without extra fuel EGT would be too high. This also kills power so if you start with the correct amount of fuel you will make more power and reduce the tendency to knock.
13.9 is much too lean and is hurting power.
Supercharged (vs naturally aspirated) engines are not as sensitive to rich mixtures (under 12.5 a/f or over .0800 f/a) hurting power but are more sensitive to lean mixtures causing problems.
Now that being said, engines tolerate these conditions for short periods of time OK, which is why everyone has gotten away with it so far. If you go out on the freeway and run full throttle for more than a few minutes, your could easily do some damage.
ok, tired of typing, let the flames begin...
Well i apprechiate the reply, i must say that i am not as happy as i was before i read your reply. I was supose to have my pulley installed today but the guy cant do it till friday, and since not one dealer in my area will change my fuel settings i am not as comfortable as i was before, especially since i like to floor my car ALOT during normal driving.
You do need to look into getting the fuel mixture correct but in the mean time, buy the best fuel you can and I doubt you can hold it to the floor long enough to kill it. Unless you live in Montana

Engines tolerate short bursts of abuse because heat does not build up.
If you can find a shop with the right facililties, and are willing to spend the dough, you should verify a/f ratio on a dyno. Think of it as an insurance policy.
All right, since you asked the short answer is yes it is too lean.
Now for the long explanation of why...
Stoichiometry is the term for the theoretical optimum mixture of elements for complete combustion.
For gasoline stoich turns out to be approx 14.7 a/f or the inverse .0680 f/a (which is what the engineering community uses). So for best efficiency this is where the engine likes to run and sure enough when we calibrate engines for part throttle operation we cal to .0680 f/a
For peak power, it turns out this number is different...
12.5 a/f, or the inverse .0800 f/a, is where it should be for peak power if, and it's a big if,exhaust gas temperature is not an issue...
So here's what happens in real life...
When an engine is calibrated during development peak power is run at .0800 f/a. this works fine until either; knock is encountered, or there is too much backpressure in the exhaust tract.
When knock is present spark timing has to be pulled out and when that is done the exhaust gas temperature (EGT) rises. When the EGT rises past critical levels (determined by the quality of the exhaust valves and other parts) the only way to cool things down is to add fuel.
Backpressure can also cause EGT to be too high and require fuel to be added to cool EGT, so you start at .0800 f/a and possibly go richer, but not leaner.
Now leaners mixtures, which produce more heat, cause knock to happen sooner (easier). More power (better cylinder filling) also lowers the knock threshold. You have both of these conditions with the pulley. If the engine knocks and if it has active knock sensors it will pull spark out and without extra fuel EGT would be too high. This also kills power so if you start with the correct amount of fuel you will make more power and reduce the tendency to knock.
13.9 is much too lean and is hurting power.
Supercharged (vs naturally aspirated) engines are not as sensitive to rich mixtures (under 12.5 a/f or over .0800 f/a) hurting power but are more sensitive to lean mixtures causing problems.
Now that being said, engines tolerate these conditions for short periods of time OK, which is why everyone has gotten away with it so far. If you go out on the freeway and run full throttle for more than a few minutes, your could easily do some damage.
ok, tired of typing, let the flames begin...
Not trying to scare you, just put some facts out here.
You do need to look into getting the fuel mixture correct but in the mean time, buy the best fuel you can and I doubt you can hold it to the floor long enough to kill it. Unless you live in Montana

Engines tolerate short bursts of abuse because heat does not build up.
If you can find a shop with the right facililties, and are willing to spend the dough, you should verify a/f ratio on a dyno. Think of it as an insurance policy.
All right, since you asked the short answer is yes it is too lean.
Now for the long explanation of why...
detailed technical stuff deleted... ok, tired of typing, let the flames begin...
Please elaborate.......
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Lets put it this way:
I install a Kleemann pulley kit, I then have to option of leaving my fuel settings at stage 1 or (with little or no effort) have the option of going to the dealership and having them changed to stage 2. Which would be optimal and why?
KLEEMANN, your company obviously did rigorous testing prior to distributing this product. After all of those tests, which setting did the "KLEEMANN C23K" end up being left on? And why? Stage I or II.
I look forward to reading your responses.
Regards,
Matt
Change the setting to Stage II- this will add a flat % increase to the base map at cold start and WOT. WOT is what you are concerned with. The are few, if any, places in the US where you can operate at full load for any meaningful length of time. Operating an engine at 13.9:1 at full load for an extended period of time could cause problems with heat/knock and the ability to dissipate it.
If you can have the settings changed with a DAS machine by all means do it. The average person lacks the ability to effectively persude a SM at a dealer to do anything with the DAS- you wouldnt belive the stories I have heard.
Long story short: Change to Stage II if possible, a wide safety margin. In this country you will probably never have the opportunity to operate your car in a way that any damge will ever occur at "baseline".
Matt-
Change the setting to Stage II- this will add a flat % increase to the base map at cold start and WOT. WOT is what you are concerned with. The are few, if any, places in the US where you can operate at full load for any meaningful length of time. Operating an engine at 13.9:1 at full load for an extended period of time could cause problems with heat/knock and the ability to dissipate it.
If you can have the settings changed with a DAS machine by all means do it. The average person lacks the ability to effectively persude a SM at a dealer to do anything with the DAS- you wouldnt belive the stories I have heard.
Long story short: Change to Stage II if possible, a wide safety margin. In this country you will probably never have the opportunity to operate your car in a way that any damge will ever occur at "baseline".
and what are somethings u would reccomend to say to a Service rep how to change the fuel settings?
thanks
) I will do everything in my power to convince my MB dealer to change fuel setting to stage II (even if it means bribing with food/$$...) then spend the $90+ for dyno with A/F ratio again (although I will try with 105 octane gas for maybe one of the runs to see if any difference). So far after doing research my car is seeing about the right amount of power I'm supposed to be and have all the textbook cases (a tad on lean side). I wont be able to do this till Jan 11th or so will keep you guys posted.
how long do u consider long to be at full throttle for any damage to likely occur?
and what are somethings u would reccomend to say to a Service rep how to change the fuel settings?
thanks
HOW to change the settings anyone in service will know, its the WHY US dealers seem to have a problem with. The problem is you are venturing into an area the average dealer has never been: performance enhancement. What seems to work best is ismply asking the to change the setting because you want them to. Its perfectly legal and within the EPA, MBZ etc to do so. The settings do nothing to violate the certification of the car.
KLEEMANN, its good to hear that you agree to have the settings changed. I own several of you products and rate them second to none. I appreciate your help on the subject and look forward to experiencing the pulley system in my car.
Regards,
Matt
what are somethings u would reccomend to say to a Service rep how to change the fuel settings?
thanks
For the fuel settings have the vehicle serviced for AudioPilot setting changes and then provide the tech with info from this board on the fuel settings.
First let me say that in 4+ years of producing many, many hundreds of pulleys for SC'd M111 engines world wide we have never had any engine damage occur. Therefore I cannot imagine what operating circumstances would bring about any damage.
HOW to change the settings anyone in service will know, its the WHY US dealers seem to have a problem with. The problem is you are venturing into an area the average dealer has never been: performance enhancement. What seems to work best is ismply asking the to change the setting because you want them to. Its perfectly legal and within the EPA, MBZ etc to do so. The settings do nothing to violate the certification of the car.
Also, i have talked to several dealers (service dept) and just told them that i want my fuel settings changed and they all ask why, so i said that i just want them changed, and of course they ask why again, and at that point i ran out of things to say so i just said i heard it runs better that way, and then they said we would not think of changing any sort of fuel settings in the ECU. I spoke to the service manager and emailed him a screen shot of the pic i belive is from you how to change the the settings and he told me that will void my warrenty and its against the Emissions. which i know is BS. So i really do not know what else to say. I would be happy to hear something else.
last, reading this thread over you say that stage 2 settings do not give u any HP and about 2 weeks or so i called KLEEMANN, and i spoke to corey and he told me that with the settings at stage 2 you gain 7 HP?
Last edited by BlackC230Coupe; Jan 1, 2003 at 02:37 AM.
Try to talk to the technician yourself and build a relationship. I have the benefit of dealing with a very small dealership with only two MB techs. One of the techs is more trained and speciallizes in electronics. I try to see him whenever my car needs service.
For the fuel settings have the vehicle serviced for AudioPilot setting changes and then provide the tech with info from this board on the fuel settings.
last, reading this thread over you say that stage 2 settings do not give u any HP and about 2 weeks or so i called KLEEMANN, and i spoke to corey and he told me that with the settings at stage 2 you gain 7 HP?
Here is the potential problem: We have a DAS machine so we can do settings on the dyno and test immediately after the cahnge (back to back runs). An average person will dyno test one day, go get settings done another day and return for another dyno in a week. Is the temp outside the same, is the cars temp the same, fuel quality, air over the IC, etc. There is easily 7hp worth of ambient change that can mislead one to think the settings are the cause. Conversely these same issues can lead to drops in power as well.
If you are close to West Palm Beach, get Renntech to change it for you.
Here is the potential problem: We have a DAS machine so we can do settings on the dyno and test immediately after the cahnge (back to back runs). An average person will dyno test one day, go get settings done another day and return for another dyno in a week. Is the temp outside the same, is the cars temp the same, fuel quality, air over the IC, etc. There is easily 7hp worth of ambient change that can mislead one to think the settings are the cause. Conversely these same issues can lead to drops in power as well.
thanks



