Sprint Booster Scientific Review !
#1
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,441
Likes: 1
From: France, Lebanon
03 c320 coupe
Sprint Booster Scientific Review !
couple days ago, someone recommended me to buy a sprint booster, after 5mins of research on this forum, i was gooing to order it when i found this pdf...
its a repost, but im sure not everybody saw this !
and as for the guy who posted this, im sorry for not quoting him ((decided to create this thread after i closed his thread and i dont feel like doing the research again...))
i totally agree with the author, it finally make sense why on the sprint booster website, they tell u "sprint booster does not change ur 0-60", while users tell u "it feels its faster"....
they r both right, it just feels that way, enjoy the analysis...
its a repost, but im sure not everybody saw this !
and as for the guy who posted this, im sorry for not quoting him ((decided to create this thread after i closed his thread and i dont feel like doing the research again...))
i totally agree with the author, it finally make sense why on the sprint booster website, they tell u "sprint booster does not change ur 0-60", while users tell u "it feels its faster"....
they r both right, it just feels that way, enjoy the analysis...
#2
couple days ago, someone recommended me to buy a sprint booster, after 5mins of research on this forum, i was gooing to order it when i found this pdf...
its a repost, but im sure not everybody saw this !
and as for the guy who posted this, im sorry for not quoting him ((decided to create this thread after i closed his thread and i dont feel like doing the research again...))
i totally agree with the author, it finally make sense why on the sprint booster website, they tell u "sprint booster does not change ur 0-60", while users tell u "it feels its faster"....
they r both right, it just feels that way, enjoy the analysis...
its a repost, but im sure not everybody saw this !
and as for the guy who posted this, im sorry for not quoting him ((decided to create this thread after i closed his thread and i dont feel like doing the research again...))
i totally agree with the author, it finally make sense why on the sprint booster website, they tell u "sprint booster does not change ur 0-60", while users tell u "it feels its faster"....
they r both right, it just feels that way, enjoy the analysis...
This is old news and the excuses that some people said you can achieved the same feel of the sprint booster if you drive your car aggressive all the time, use manual shifting when passing..etc. Yes, all of what they said is true but why need to go throught all that to get te car to excelerate at it peak when with the sprint booster, you will get 100% of peak exceleration every time you step on the gas paddle. The problem with Mercedes (not just Mercedes) wire-drive by throttle is the delay in throttle response when you floor it in an emergency passing situation. With the sprint booster, the delay throttle response is non-exist. Btw, these feature are now came with my car from factory. Take the new M3 for example, the "SPORT" on the console, it pretty much does the exact same thing as the sprint booster.
Last edited by Klinh; 01-08-2009 at 02:48 AM.
#3
my thoughts/annotations...
quoting pdf...
From Throttle Response Measurements:
He basically shows us that the responsiveness is a function of the speed at which the pedal is pressed.
Pressing Slower --> More lag / Less throttle response
Pressing Faster --> Less Lag / More throttle response
From Sprint Booster Measurements:
"It is important to note that any accelerator signal into the ECU using a Sprint
Booster can be duplicated exactly by a driver without a Sprint Booster, merely by pressing the accelerator pedal a greater distance."
-pressing the acelerator a greater distance takes more time
"Basically, the Sprint Booster makes the accelerator pedal
about 30% more sensitive. A side effect, ... is that the accelerator pedal becomes dead beyond about two thirds travel with Sprint Booster."
-being more sensitive early on results in a faster initial response
-even if it is "dead" for the last 2/3rd's of pressing the pedal, you reach the throttle response threshold earlier and this allows you to maximize the total responsiveness of the car earlier on (i.e. reduces lag)
**note: "last 2/3'rds dead" only applies to pressing it steadily/slowly, later he shows that when you press it quickly, only the last 1/3rd of pressing the accelerator is dead
From Sprint Booster and Throttle Response:
"Here, we see that initially the throttle response is virtually identical to that with no Sprint Booster connected. However, at the top 1/3 of accelerator pedal travel, where the pedal has now become 'dead', the throttle response catches up to the accelerator"
-This is what I just said in the note above: when pressing it fast, the first 2/3rds respond very similar to stock, and last 1/3rd is dead
"It directly affects only this one parameter, signal amplitude. It, in and of
itself, doesn't really do anything faster. The speed at which things get done
depends upon how fast the driver presses the accelerator pedal."
-The pure responsiveness of the throttle is a function of the speed and distance the pedal is pressed (human dependent)
-assuming when the accelerator becomes "dead", that the ECU is controlling the throttle response (ECU dependent): therefore they would perform the same stock vs sprint booster
-The distance and speed of pressing the pedal can be changed whether or not you have a sprint booster: less work required to get a full response with a sprint booster
"...as a driver I can duplicate the Sprint Booster result simply by pressing on the pedal a bit faster. The only time that the Sprint Booster can make anything happen faster is if I absolutely mash the pedal to the floor."
**Pressing pedal faster mimicks Sprint Booster
-for driving in the city, it would be entirely uncomfortable to "mash" the accelerator to get a sporty response for day to day driving.
**Pressing pedal slower is aided by Sprint Boster
-this involves the majority of natural city driving which is the most fun in my opinion, and here's where you benefit
"In theory, that would translate into a faster 0-60 acceleration figure of something less than 0.035 second. In actuality, the increase is so small
that it is not measurable."
-this only applies when comparing it to "mashing"/flooring it: see above "**"
From Throttle Response Measurements:
He basically shows us that the responsiveness is a function of the speed at which the pedal is pressed.
Pressing Slower --> More lag / Less throttle response
Pressing Faster --> Less Lag / More throttle response
From Sprint Booster Measurements:
"It is important to note that any accelerator signal into the ECU using a Sprint
Booster can be duplicated exactly by a driver without a Sprint Booster, merely by pressing the accelerator pedal a greater distance."
-pressing the acelerator a greater distance takes more time
"Basically, the Sprint Booster makes the accelerator pedal
about 30% more sensitive. A side effect, ... is that the accelerator pedal becomes dead beyond about two thirds travel with Sprint Booster."
-being more sensitive early on results in a faster initial response
-even if it is "dead" for the last 2/3rd's of pressing the pedal, you reach the throttle response threshold earlier and this allows you to maximize the total responsiveness of the car earlier on (i.e. reduces lag)
**note: "last 2/3'rds dead" only applies to pressing it steadily/slowly, later he shows that when you press it quickly, only the last 1/3rd of pressing the accelerator is dead
From Sprint Booster and Throttle Response:
"Here, we see that initially the throttle response is virtually identical to that with no Sprint Booster connected. However, at the top 1/3 of accelerator pedal travel, where the pedal has now become 'dead', the throttle response catches up to the accelerator"
-This is what I just said in the note above: when pressing it fast, the first 2/3rds respond very similar to stock, and last 1/3rd is dead
"It directly affects only this one parameter, signal amplitude. It, in and of
itself, doesn't really do anything faster. The speed at which things get done
depends upon how fast the driver presses the accelerator pedal."
-The pure responsiveness of the throttle is a function of the speed and distance the pedal is pressed (human dependent)
-assuming when the accelerator becomes "dead", that the ECU is controlling the throttle response (ECU dependent): therefore they would perform the same stock vs sprint booster
-The distance and speed of pressing the pedal can be changed whether or not you have a sprint booster: less work required to get a full response with a sprint booster
"...as a driver I can duplicate the Sprint Booster result simply by pressing on the pedal a bit faster. The only time that the Sprint Booster can make anything happen faster is if I absolutely mash the pedal to the floor."
**Pressing pedal faster mimicks Sprint Booster
-for driving in the city, it would be entirely uncomfortable to "mash" the accelerator to get a sporty response for day to day driving.
**Pressing pedal slower is aided by Sprint Boster
-this involves the majority of natural city driving which is the most fun in my opinion, and here's where you benefit
"In theory, that would translate into a faster 0-60 acceleration figure of something less than 0.035 second. In actuality, the increase is so small
that it is not measurable."
-this only applies when comparing it to "mashing"/flooring it: see above "**"
#4
This is old news and the excuses that some people said you can achieved the same feel of the sprint booster if you drive your car aggressive all the time, use manual shifting when passing..etc. Yes, all of what they said is true but why need to go throught all that to get te car to excelerate at it peak when with the sprint booster, you will get 100% of peak exceleration every time you step on the gas paddle. The problem with Mercedes (not just Mercedes) wire-drive by throttle is the delay in throttle response when you floor it in an emergency passing situation. With the sprint booster, the delay throttle response is non-exist. Btw, these feature are now came with my car from factory. Take the new M3 for example, the "SPORT" on the console, it pretty much does the exact same thing as the sprint booster.
You dont have to manually downshift to achieve what the booster achieves. Simply push the pedal 30% further, and you will trigger the exact same kickdown event.
I think I noticed a couple of (what I think might be) mis-interpretations of the results, but it might just be the verbage confusing me. The data is very revealing.
Last edited by SickSpeedMonte; 01-08-2009 at 08:58 AM.
#5
Super Moderator
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 19,942
Likes: 183
From: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
late 2009 CLK 350 Coupe Elegance, '65 Jaguar S Type wires
Please read the previous - long winded thread in this regard. The Sprintbooster principle is dead simple - & frequently misunderstood or over complicated by people.
A competent tuning shop can reprogramme your ECU to achieve exactly the same thing.
A competent tuning shop can reprogramme your ECU to achieve exactly the same thing.
#6
the long winded thread is full of theories not supported by evidence. there are too many conflicting views. it was about time someone took the time to find out what was actually going on.
according to the review, the throttle response is a function of our accelerator reaction time (human response). mercedes has made it adaptable for comfort because it is a luxury car, but still the potential to give you response when you "mash" the pedal and need it.
there is a negative feedback for slower human responses (slowly accelerating) that result in slower throttle responses and a more "comfortable" driving experience. this comfort/slower reponse is eliminated by the sprint booster and mirrors the way our cars adapt with a faster human response ("mashing" the pedal).
i dont think its as simple as you think
#7
quoting pdf...
From Throttle Response Measurements:
He basically shows us that the responsiveness is a function of the speed at which the pedal is pressed.
Pressing Slower --> More lag / Less throttle response
Pressing Faster --> Less Lag / More throttle response
From Throttle Response Measurements:
He basically shows us that the responsiveness is a function of the speed at which the pedal is pressed.
Pressing Slower --> More lag / Less throttle response
Pressing Faster --> Less Lag / More throttle response
From Sprint Booster Measurements:
"It is important to note that any accelerator signal into the ECU using a Sprint
Booster can be duplicated exactly by a driver without a Sprint Booster, merely by pressing the accelerator pedal a greater distance."
-pressing the acelerator a greater distance takes more time
The only time it increases your capability is at maximum effort throttle application, and VERY marginally at that (0.07s is about inperceiveable by a human, there are plenty of other factors that will overpower this perception of lag, such as the ability of the greater air volume to get from the throttle blade to the cylinder).
"Basically, the Sprint Booster makes the accelerator pedal
about 30% more sensitive. A side effect, ... is that the accelerator pedal becomes dead beyond about two thirds travel with Sprint Booster."
-being more sensitive early on results in a faster initial response
-even if it is "dead" for the last 2/3rd's of pressing the pedal, you reach the throttle response threshold earlier and this allows you to maximize the total responsiveness of the car earlier on (i.e. reduces lag)
**note: "last 2/3'rds dead" only applies to pressing it steadily/slowly, later he shows that when you press it quickly, only the last 1/3rd of pressing the accelerator is dead
-The pure responsiveness of the throttle is a function of the speed and distance the pedal is pressed (human dependent)
-assuming when the accelerator becomes "dead", that the ECU is controlling the throttle response (ECU dependent): therefore they would perform the same stock vs sprint booster
-assuming when the accelerator becomes "dead", that the ECU is controlling the throttle response (ECU dependent): therefore they would perform the same stock vs sprint booster
"...as a driver I can duplicate the Sprint Booster result simply by pressing on the pedal a bit faster. The only time that the Sprint Booster can make anything happen faster is if I absolutely mash the pedal to the floor."
**Pressing pedal faster mimicks Sprint Booster
-for driving in the city, it would be entirely uncomfortable to "mash" the accelerator to get a sporty response for day to day driving.
**Pressing pedal slower is aided by Sprint Boster
-this involves the majority of natural city driving which is the most fun in my opinion, and here's where you benefit
**Pressing pedal faster mimicks Sprint Booster
-for driving in the city, it would be entirely uncomfortable to "mash" the accelerator to get a sporty response for day to day driving.
**Pressing pedal slower is aided by Sprint Boster
-this involves the majority of natural city driving which is the most fun in my opinion, and here's where you benefit
If you like this product, then by all means, use it and enjoy it. But it is what it is, its shortening the total effective throttle pedal throw, thats all. It's not adding any capability to the car, and its not telling the trans to shift any differently (in response to having to manually shift to duplicate the effects of the booster).
IMO, its the placibo of the aftermarket.
Trending Topics
#8
Super Moderator
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 19,942
Likes: 183
From: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
late 2009 CLK 350 Coupe Elegance, '65 Jaguar S Type wires
It's as simple as smaller pedal movement creates larger throttle plate movement.
(I wanted to say logarithmic but that complicates the issue)
(I wanted to say logarithmic but that complicates the issue)
#9
lol, its a signal amplifier. V_out = 1.3 * V_in (or close enough to it... im sure its not perfectly linear, but its close enough that nobody would know any different if it were)
Pretty simple. The adaptive drive still functions as it did before, you are just scaling all curves by 1.3.
Pretty simple. The adaptive drive still functions as it did before, you are just scaling all curves by 1.3.
#10
Super Moderator
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 19,942
Likes: 183
From: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
late 2009 CLK 350 Coupe Elegance, '65 Jaguar S Type wires
lol, its a signal amplifier. V_out = 1.3 * V_in (or close enough to it... im sure its not perfectly linear, but its close enough that nobody would know any different if it were)
Pretty simple. The adaptive drive still functions as it did before, you are just scaling all curves by 1.3.
Pretty simple. The adaptive drive still functions as it did before, you are just scaling all curves by 1.3.
Last edited by Glyn M Ruck; 01-08-2009 at 09:50 AM.
#11
lol, its a signal amplifier. V_out = 1.3 * V_in (or close enough to it... im sure its not perfectly linear, but its close enough that nobody would know any different if it were)
Pretty simple. The adaptive drive still functions as it did before, you are just scaling all curves by 1.3.
Pretty simple. The adaptive drive still functions as it did before, you are just scaling all curves by 1.3.
i made a mistake with the 2/3rds vs 1/3rd because i think i read it too quickly. thanks for pointing that out. but everything else stands.
you have some good points, but it is not placebo of aftermarket because it does affect responsiveness.
#12
i disagree: the sprint booster does exactly this. by making it more sensitive, it opens the throttle earlier/faster. so it reduces the time. it does this by amplifying the signal.
#13
i only said it isn't as simple because of the adaptive drive and that makes the overall car response as a function of both the person driving AND the adaptive drive.. so its not a direct relationship. i wasn't, however, referring to the actual sprint booster. i meant the entire system with/without it.
i made a mistake with the 2/3rds vs 1/3rd because i think i read it too quickly. thanks for pointing that out. but everything else stands.
you have some good points, but it is not placebo of aftermarket because it does affect responsiveness.
i made a mistake with the 2/3rds vs 1/3rd because i think i read it too quickly. thanks for pointing that out. but everything else stands.
you have some good points, but it is not placebo of aftermarket because it does affect responsiveness.
I feel that its more of a tuning parameter than an upgrade.
#14
#15
#16
#17
yeah well, once you get going then it doesn't really affect you. mine is 6-speed, and every time i shift/accelerate or rev-match it makes a big difference. its a must have for manual drivers, but unnecessary for auto IMO.
#18
To me, its the time difference between applying the throttle and getting a response to that application. For example, if I pass 10% throttle on my way to 25%, its the time from 10% pedal to 10% throttle opening, and similarly 25% pedal to 25% throttle. The sprint booster only makes 25% pedal move to, say 20%. So if you consider the new total pedal throw, your 25% throttle pedal application is in a different position, but the time it takes for your throttle blade to react to the same 25% signal is no different. You reach 25% faster for the same input speed on the pedal, but like I said, that can be overcome by simply pushing the pedal faster (unless you are talking max effort application)
The driver will adjust to this change anyway and slow throttle application to achieve the same results as pre-booster during normal driving.
#19
Super Moderator
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 19,942
Likes: 183
From: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
late 2009 CLK 350 Coupe Elegance, '65 Jaguar S Type wires
It opens the throttle plate (butterfly) by a greater amount for a given pedal input!
#20
Maybe we are just defining the lag differently.
To me, its the time difference between applying the throttle and getting a response to that application. For example, if I pass 10% throttle on my way to 25%, its the time from 10% pedal to 10% throttle opening, and similarly 25% pedal to 25% throttle. The sprint booster only makes 25% pedal move to, say 20%. So if you consider the new total pedal throw, your 25% throttle pedal application is in a different position, but the time it takes for your throttle blade to react to the same 25% signal is no different. You reach 25% faster for the same input speed on the pedal, but like I said, that can be overcome by simply pushing the pedal faster (unless you are talking max effort application)
The driver will adjust to this change anyway and slow throttle application to achieve the same results as pre-booster during normal driving.
To me, its the time difference between applying the throttle and getting a response to that application. For example, if I pass 10% throttle on my way to 25%, its the time from 10% pedal to 10% throttle opening, and similarly 25% pedal to 25% throttle. The sprint booster only makes 25% pedal move to, say 20%. So if you consider the new total pedal throw, your 25% throttle pedal application is in a different position, but the time it takes for your throttle blade to react to the same 25% signal is no different. You reach 25% faster for the same input speed on the pedal, but like I said, that can be overcome by simply pushing the pedal faster (unless you are talking max effort application)
The driver will adjust to this change anyway and slow throttle application to achieve the same results as pre-booster during normal driving.
i gotta get some actual work done this morning so i gotta peace out..
#21
Thread Starter
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,441
Likes: 1
From: France, Lebanon
03 c320 coupe
If the last 1/3 is dead, you feel that your pressing only 2/3 of the pedal, you want to accelerate since you think you can, but you cant... imagine that happening in a crirical situation
So the sprint booster is faking your feeling.. and you dont know anymore, how much of the available power your using !
And of course, amplifying the signal by 30% === reducing your maximum mpg by 30%
Last edited by HellsAngel; 01-08-2009 at 12:20 PM.
#22
Super Moderator
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 19,942
Likes: 183
From: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
late 2009 CLK 350 Coupe Elegance, '65 Jaguar S Type wires
#24
Some of you guys are so thick headed its unbelievable. The simple facts that came out of that white paper are that a sprint booster does nothing more than REDUCE YOUR PEDAL TRAVEL by compressing the response into less distance out of the pedal. That is *ALL* that it does. You might as well put a wood block under the pedal adjusted so that the gas pedal can only be pushed down 70% of the way, because the other 30% is now useless! All this does is makes your vehicle HARDER to control (acceleration wise). If you feel like this makes your car faster or more responsive than you are sadly mistaken. You could just press the pedal down further and you would *EXACTLY* match the "improvements" from a sprint booster. This is not opinion, it's fact. I said this from the beginning in the huge sprint booster thread. I'm glad this white paper was posted!
Last edited by acr2001; 01-08-2009 at 06:41 PM.
#25
The only reason I picked up an SB was to remove that lag entirely and allow the car to kickdown instantaneously.
So no, you can not match the improvements of an SB, exactly.
EDIT:
Before anyone asks, Yes, I have read the paper. I have performed my own tests without the SB installed and prefer the SB to stock. Simple as that.
Last edited by gregr09; 01-08-2009 at 07:11 PM.