H&R Sports installed (pics)
Hit me up on the PM if ya want some simple pix taken of your car!
01-24-2009 | 12:22 AM
#6
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,683
Likes: 26
From: Western Canada
2013 C63 AMG P31, 2014 GMC Sierra (6.2)
It looks good! I'm thinking of lowering my C55 a bit and was considering H&R or Vogtland (had them on my C32). So you went with the Sports and not the OE Sports correct?
Trending Topics
01-25-2009 | 01:06 PM
#16
Thread Starter
Almost a Member!
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
From: Bellevue, WA
'06 C230
01-25-2009 | 02:48 PM
#17
Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 194
Likes: 1
2005 c230 sport, k7 gsxr
pogi are u rubbin at all or u roll ur fenders? any issues with cutting a coil? u have the perfect drop
... also do u have pics with that drop w/ stock wheels.
jonnyD i like the back but the front needs to go further down asap!
... also do u have pics with that drop w/ stock wheels.jonnyD i like the back but the front needs to go further down asap!
01-25-2009 | 03:09 PM
#18
Thread Starter
Almost a Member!
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
From: Bellevue, WA
'06 C230
Ain't gonna happen. The C-Class has a factory rake to it that appears to be an optical illusion because of how the fender wells are not symmetrical. The back "appears" lower than the front because of the smaller fender gap than the front has. If you were to draw a straight line from the top of the fender well in front to the fender well in the rear, you'd see what I'm referring to. If i were to drop the front lower to make the gap "appear" to be the same, the car would be way lower in the front than the back and give even more of a raked look that doesn't appeal to me.
I also do a TON of commuting and don't want the car any lower than it is with the H&R drop.
I also do a TON of commuting and don't want the car any lower than it is with the H&R drop.
01-25-2009 | 03:28 PM
#19
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,683
Likes: 26
From: Western Canada
2013 C63 AMG P31, 2014 GMC Sierra (6.2)
I don't mean to be a pain but could you post some more picks of the side in the daytime in natural lighting? I was looking at the ones Evosport has on their site here: http://www.evosport.com/product/default.aspx
Do you know which ones yours are?
Do you know which ones yours are?
01-26-2009 | 04:14 PM
#20
Almost a Member!
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA, USA
2003 C240 & 2005 BMW 330Ci ZHP 6MT
I don't mean to be a pain but could you post some more picks of the side in the daytime in natural lighting? I was looking at the ones Evosport has on their site here: http://www.evosport.com/product/default.aspx
Do you know which ones yours are?
Do you know which ones yours are?
02-05-2009 | 08:06 PM
#22
Super Member
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 544
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, CA
05.C230K.SS
Ain't gonna happen. The C-Class has a factory rake to it that appears to be an optical illusion because of how the fender wells are not symmetrical. The back "appears" lower than the front because of the smaller fender gap than the front has. If you were to draw a straight line from the top of the fender well in front to the fender well in the rear, you'd see what I'm referring to. If i were to drop the front lower to make the gap "appear" to be the same, the car would be way lower in the front than the back and give even more of a raked look that doesn't appeal to me.
I also do a TON of commuting and don't want the car any lower than it is with the H&R drop.
I also do a TON of commuting and don't want the car any lower than it is with the H&R drop.
So...does having the rake look have less aerodynamic drag?
02-07-2009 | 02:37 PM
#23
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
05 c230 kompressor
no rubbin at all.. and sorry i dont have a pic with my stocks w/ this drop.
03-11-2009 | 07:24 PM
#25
Member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
From: South O.C.
C280
