Help - Problem with new brake pads...
On the fronts the new pads don't appear to be making full contact with the rotor - I can see that the inner portion of the rotor is the usual proper color (smooth and dark with a hint of blue) while the outer portion of the rotor is a lighter whiter color. This problem did not occur on the rears. I notice that it takes a fair amount of added pedal force to stop compared to the stock pads I had.
Does this make sense? Is this a common issue, and do I just need new front rotors? The new pads have about 1000 miles on them so far with no improvement.
Oh and I did bed them in to the point of smoke coming off of them without improvement!
I'll post a picture of the rotors soon...
Last edited by acr2001; Mar 27, 2009 at 05:34 PM.

If you are seeing abnormal blueing you could be getting some localised overheating.
Did you do a pad break in? I must say it's something I never do & have never had a problem.
If you are seeing abnormal blueing you could be getting some localised overheating.
Did you do a pad break in? I must say it's something I never do & have never had a problem.
I think the rotors are damaged at this point from overheating because the new pads are making contact with less than half of the rotor unless I'm doing hard braking at which point I do get full contact. I'm just starting to feel a pulse in the pedal from a high spot.
I guess this is why MB says to always replace the pads and rotors at the same time, would have saved me time money and frustration.
Last edited by acr2001; Mar 27, 2009 at 09:03 PM.
:

When people recommend a pad they should tell you what rotor it is running on. In my racing days I found that the friction material required for a straight Brembo ventilated steel disc was quite different from that required by a Japanese plasma coated disc - as an example.
Last edited by Glyn M Ruck; Mar 27, 2009 at 10:44 PM.
I think the moral of it all is that N-O-T-H-I-N-G has the same bite as the stock pads, and anyone who says otherwise is either mistaken or lying.
I had read that MB recommended new rotors when changing the pads. My stock pads have 80% of their life left on them, I only changed them to stop the dust. Looks like they're going back on since they are worn at the same angle as the rotors.
Last edited by acr2001; Mar 27, 2009 at 11:35 PM.

The truth is that, as usual, Benz have worked & balanced the compromises very well - I like the feeling of the stock brakes for normal everyday use - nicely progressive & all. I was talking to a very bright young Prof who is one of SAs top tuners the other day. The subject of ECU tuning arose. He recons that Benz ECU tuning is just about perfect & that messing with it takes away more than it gives in all round performance. I think there is a lesson in there somewhere.
BTW - splinter posted the MB rotor condemning limits a few weeks back.
Last edited by Glyn M Ruck; Mar 28, 2009 at 09:25 AM.
Trending Topics
And my car is running stock pads! Very weird to me. I'm starting to get a slight vibration (19k miles on the stock pads) so I'll be redoing brakes soon.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
They were not making full contact - I know this because as you get closer to the outer edge of the pad, its worn in less and the original surface is partially visible.
I think I figured out why too - on the front brakes, the pistons are totally flat but the MB pads come with shims attached that have cut outs only at the bottom where the piston makes contact. These cut outs cause the piston to hit the brake pads at a very slight angle. Because of this the pads / rotors wear at that slight angle. The new brake pads did not have the same design, and instead had totally flat shims.
On top of all of that, I had two mechanics tell me today that the stock rotors are made of a custom material which is soft and designed for the material used on the stock pads. They told me aftermarket pads need to be used with aftermarket rotors on these cars.
I always swap the rotors and pads together just as a precaution. Since brakes isn't something you want to be too laxed on. I bought akembo ceramic street pads with oem rotors. I noticed the ceramics stop slightly better then oem but no dust. Only bad thing is that in the cold mornings they do make noise until you drive about 40yds and they heat up.
I've done some canyon carving and they've held up well under strong braking and heat...no brake fade at all.

My point is that I did bed them in, just not immediately after installing them and it didn't help, I don't think waiting made any difference. One website actually recommended driving a few hundred miles normally before bedding.
Even if bedding them first is better, as I said the MB pads were designed differently so that they wore at an angle, all the bedding in the world wouldn't fix that - the pads would have required at least few thousand miles of wear before they would have made full contact.
To further the point, I think bedding them probably did more damage than it did good because of the partial contact. It created hot spots on the rotor during the bedding process.
Last edited by acr2001; Mar 29, 2009 at 02:16 PM.
I always swap the rotors and pads together just as a precaution. Since brakes isn't something you want to be too laxed on. I bought akembo ceramic street pads with oem rotors. I noticed the ceramics stop slightly better then oem but no dust. Only bad thing is that in the cold mornings they do make noise until you drive about 40yds and they heat up.
I've done some canyon carving and they've held up well under strong braking and heat...no brake fade at all.
Your assumption is that the pads were designed wrong? You need to step back and really look at what happened. Either the pads were installed incorrectly or there was a problem with the rotor to hub interface that wasn't corrected. If a pad isn't making full contact there is a problem. If they wear at an angle there is a problem in the mechanism, not the pads. If you knew how pads are manufactured you would rule out the thought that the pads are crooked on the backing plates.
Your assumption is that the pads were designed wrong? You need to step back and really look at what happened. Either the pads were installed incorrectly or there was a problem with the rotor to hub interface that wasn't corrected. If a pad isn't making full contact there is a problem. If they wear at an angle there is a problem in the mechanism, not the pads. If you knew how pads are manufactured you would rule out the thought that the pads are crooked on the backing plates.
Do you know what I'm talking about when I say that the MB shims have a partial cutout in them? I wish I could find a picture. This will cause a slight angle as the pads and rotors wear in, there is no question about it. And I can tell you that all 4 front pads on my car have this angle. The left and right side match perfectly, so I don't think it's a defect.
9 out of 10 drivers and mechanics I know do not bed new pads in at all, so regardless of whats said on the web, you're not going to CAUSE damage by not bedding the pads in. The main cause of my problem was the angle that the MB pads and rotors wore at.
Obviously if I installed new rotors I wouldn't have had that problem.
Another bit of info: the stock front pads are different on the left and right - you cannot install a pad for the drivers side on the passengers side with the stock pads. This is because of the cutout I mentioned. It lines up differently with the piston on either side. With the aftermarket pads (at least the ones I used) the front pads were all the same.
Last edited by acr2001; Mar 29, 2009 at 02:22 PM.
On a side note, how bad is it that I reused the caliper bolts and 'clips' on the front? I also reused the pins on the rear brakes.
I know you're supposed to toss at least the bolts and install new ones.
Do you know what I'm talking about when I say that the MB shims have a partial cutout in them? I wish I could find a picture. This will cause a slight angle as the pads and rotors wear in, there is no question about it. And I can tell you that all 4 front pads on my car have this angle. The left and right side match perfectly, so I don't think it's a defect.
9 out of 10 drivers and mechanics I know do not bed new pads in at all, so regardless of whats said on the web, you're not going to CAUSE damage by not bedding the pads in. The main cause of my problem was the angle that the MB pads and rotors wore at.
Obviously if I installed new rotors I wouldn't have had that problem.
Another bit of info: the stock front pads are different on the left and right - you cannot install a pad for the drivers side on the passengers side with the stock pads. This is because of the cutout I mentioned. It lines up differently with the piston on either side. With the aftermarket pads (at least the ones I used) the front pads were all the same.
I wasn't trying to prove you wrong, I'm just looking for an explanation because the facts seem to speak for themselves - the MB pads result in a slight angle compared to the pads I bought which are completely flat. The photos show it.
I know you have a ton of experience with this stuff (plenty more than I do), but until someone can explain this I believe my reasoning makes the most sense as far as the different backing plates are concerned. Obviously MB is spending extra money to cut those notches into them (where the piston touches) for some reason, while the aftermarket pads don't bother with it.
Last edited by acr2001; Mar 29, 2009 at 04:47 PM.
Last edited by mleskovar; Mar 29, 2009 at 05:41 PM.
So to put it another way, roughly half of the piston was making contact with the pad, and the half making contact was the half that was inside that cutout in the back plate. This is why I made the assumption that MB added that cutout in order to create a slight angle when the piston hits the pads. If mine wore wrong then they did so on both sides exactly the same amount. Maybe mine did wear wrong, because what you're saying sounds like it makes more sense now that were both on the same page. My brakes are working great again now that I put the original pads back on.
Last edited by acr2001; Mar 29, 2009 at 06:55 PM.
So to put it another way, roughly half of the piston was making contact with the pad, and the half making contact was the half that was inside that cutout in the back plate. This is why I made the assumption that MB added that cutout in order to create a slight angle when the piston hits the pads. If mine wore wrong then they did so on both sides exactly the same amount.






