Clunk from front-end with C32 sway bar
#26
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 2,465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2002 C230 K
Are you insulting my "artistic" or is that "autistic" skills?
Now that you've posted that pic, I've remembered that I actually have it saved on my hard drive. Guess I could have saved myself three minutes of drawing time.
![Big Grin](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
BT
Now that you've posted that pic, I've remembered that I actually have it saved on my hard drive. Guess I could have saved myself three minutes of drawing time.
![Big Grin](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
BT
#27
Super Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: SF South Bay
Posts: 844
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2002 C230 Coupe
Originally posted by trench
PS: Does anyone know the torque values for all of these connections (to prevent putting the things on too loose)?
PS: Does anyone know the torque values for all of these connections (to prevent putting the things on too loose)?
1: Measure the torque required to loosen the original bolt -> ~20 ft-lb.
2: Re-tighten the bolt to ~25 ft-lb.
3: Loosen it again and re-measure the torque -> ~20 ft-lb, which is equal to the original setting.
So I figured 25 ft-lb was the correct value. This is true for all the sway bar connection bolts (front and rear), not sure for the end-link strut side bolt though as I didn't change that.
#28
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
C240 - 6 speed
Originally posted by 20FHK02
The torque should be around 25 ft-lb. I measured this using a torque wrench and here were what I did:
1: Measure the torque required to loosen the original bolt -> ~20 ft-lb.
2: Re-tighten the bolt to ~25 ft-lb.
3: Loosen it again and re-measure the torque -> ~20 ft-lb, which is equal to the original setting.
So I figured 25 ft-lb was the correct value. This is true for all the sway bar connection bolts (front and rear), not sure for the end-link strut side bolt though as I didn't change that.
The torque should be around 25 ft-lb. I measured this using a torque wrench and here were what I did:
1: Measure the torque required to loosen the original bolt -> ~20 ft-lb.
2: Re-tighten the bolt to ~25 ft-lb.
3: Loosen it again and re-measure the torque -> ~20 ft-lb, which is equal to the original setting.
So I figured 25 ft-lb was the correct value. This is true for all the sway bar connection bolts (front and rear), not sure for the end-link strut side bolt though as I didn't change that.
#30
MBWorld Fanatic!
![Unhappy](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/icons/icon9.gif)
oops, I didn't locktite on reassemble.
Is that bad?
At the same time, it took a lot of torque to get most of the bolts off, (not the end links) and I bolted them back to approx the same torque, cranked on them good, and they still had blue stuff in the threads so I figured it would be good.
No?
Is that bad?
At the same time, it took a lot of torque to get most of the bolts off, (not the end links) and I bolted them back to approx the same torque, cranked on them good, and they still had blue stuff in the threads so I figured it would be good.
No?
#33
MBWorld Fanatic!
So, it's true.
Some of the C coupes do NOT have the same end links as the C32.
The hole on the sway bar is bigger than the end link.
How much of a problem is this?
Will the c32 end links bolt right up?
Some of the C coupes do NOT have the same end links as the C32.
The hole on the sway bar is bigger than the end link.
How much of a problem is this?
Will the c32 end links bolt right up?
#34
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
C240 - 6 speed
Originally posted by C230 Sport Coup
So, it's true.
Some of the C coupes do NOT have the same end links as the C32.
The hole on the sway bar is bigger than the end link.
How much of a problem is this?
Will the c32 end links bolt right up?
So, it's true.
Some of the C coupes do NOT have the same end links as the C32.
The hole on the sway bar is bigger than the end link.
How much of a problem is this?
Will the c32 end links bolt right up?
#35
MBWorld Fanatic!
BUMP!
Don't want this thread to die.
With all the people who have now gone with the AMG sways,
I'm wondering if there's more we need to do?
Buell, don't you have a comment on this?
Is having the stock endlinks a problem?
Anybody have access to both types, take some measurements?
The parts guy I talked to was kinda, well, wierd.
He says "so you're trying to justify it?"
Me. Justify? Huh? I'm just gathering data.
"Well it's still a modification".
Me: Hmmm, uh perhaps, with stock MBZ parts designed for this car. Whats your point?
Him" Well just that it's a modification"
Me: (I just wondering where this guy is going)
Him " Hey it doesn't matter to me where you buy your parts"
Me: Well I bought them from you, if it makes you feel any better
and on and on....
I guess, installing a sway bar 2mm thicker than stock, right off the MBZ shelf, is quite big deal for these guys.
Him "where are you getting this information?"
Me: On the internet, a user group of people who own these cars
Don't want this thread to die.
With all the people who have now gone with the AMG sways,
I'm wondering if there's more we need to do?
Buell, don't you have a comment on this?
Is having the stock endlinks a problem?
Anybody have access to both types, take some measurements?
The parts guy I talked to was kinda, well, wierd.
He says "so you're trying to justify it?"
Me. Justify? Huh? I'm just gathering data.
"Well it's still a modification".
Me: Hmmm, uh perhaps, with stock MBZ parts designed for this car. Whats your point?
Him" Well just that it's a modification"
Me: (I just wondering where this guy is going)
Him " Hey it doesn't matter to me where you buy your parts"
Me: Well I bought them from you, if it makes you feel any better
and on and on....
I guess, installing a sway bar 2mm thicker than stock, right off the MBZ shelf, is quite big deal for these guys.
Him "where are you getting this information?"
Me: On the internet, a user group of people who own these cars
#36
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 2,465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2002 C230 K
Yeah, some of the dealers are cool (bora's dealer installed his AMG sways) and others seem to have a problem with adding MB parts to an MB car.
Somewhat frustrating...
It would be nice if there were an easy way to tell what parts were on which cars (i.e. the fact that apparently some C230K's have the AMG end-links and some don't).
- BT
Somewhat frustrating...
It would be nice if there were an easy way to tell what parts were on which cars (i.e. the fact that apparently some C230K's have the AMG end-links and some don't).
![Roll Eyes (Sarcastic)](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
- BT
#37
Super Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Brisbane/Sydney, Australia
Posts: 782
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My dealer installed the sway with no questions. Its an MB part! I also asked him about other suspension mods and he said as long as they are within spec, then it will not affect your warranty whatsoever...some dealers are just trying to be a pain in the a$$ me thinks.
#38
MBWorld Fanatic!
Yeh,
it amazes me that you buy the C7 package, and they leave out the pedal cover for the E brake, which at full retail is a 9 dollar part from the SL.
If they just put it in all of the C7's it would cost MBZ what 2 bucks?
Just buyuing that got me a lot of questions.
How'd you know to order that?
it amazes me that you buy the C7 package, and they leave out the pedal cover for the E brake, which at full retail is a 9 dollar part from the SL.
If they just put it in all of the C7's it would cost MBZ what 2 bucks?
Just buyuing that got me a lot of questions.
How'd you know to order that?
#39
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
C240 - 6 speed
Originally posted by trench
Yeah, some of the dealers are cool (bora's dealer installed his AMG sways) and others seem to have a problem with adding MB parts to an MB car.
Somewhat frustrating...
It would be nice if there were an easy way to tell what parts were on which cars (i.e. the fact that apparently some C230K's have the AMG end-links and some don't).
- BT
Yeah, some of the dealers are cool (bora's dealer installed his AMG sways) and others seem to have a problem with adding MB parts to an MB car.
Somewhat frustrating...
It would be nice if there were an easy way to tell what parts were on which cars (i.e. the fact that apparently some C230K's have the AMG end-links and some don't).
![Roll Eyes (Sarcastic)](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif)
- BT
I don't see how MB original swaybars could have any effect on your warranty except the fun you will be having :-)
#40
Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2002 C240 6 spd manual
![Thumbs up](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/icons/icon14.gif)
Just installed the C32 sways on my C240 this weekend (front and rear). I am very pleased with the reduction in body roll and improved handling. The install was easy. I did have to file the hole for the end link to the strut on the front so the end link would fit through. I measured the diameters of the end links (stock C240 vs. C32) and the C32 was a little larger. No strange noises eminating from the car after install!
![Big Grin](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#41
Super Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: SF South Bay
Posts: 844
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2002 C230 Coupe
Originally posted by TXTiger
I measured the diameters of the end links (stock C240 vs. C32) and the C32 was a little larger.
I measured the diameters of the end links (stock C240 vs. C32) and the C32 was a little larger.
The one on my stock C230 is 9mm, is it the same as yours?
#42
MBWorld Fanatic!
C'mon guys....we need imperical data!
TXTiger
You say you measured.
Was that an eyeball measurement? Can you tell us what those measurements were?
So, it does appear you DID go with the C32 endlinks.
Many people did not.
Did this thread influence your decision or did you have other info?
Did you happen to measure the thickness of the link itself, stock vs. AMG? IS the AMG thicker?
I'm trying to decide if I should replace the stock ones with the AMG ones....
Also, I'm not clear how the end links play into the overall handling of the car. Anyone out there explain this? And how the thickness of the end links effects handling AND is there an effect on alignment? Is putting the AMG bars in without the end links a waste?
more info please
You say you measured.
Was that an eyeball measurement? Can you tell us what those measurements were?
So, it does appear you DID go with the C32 endlinks.
Many people did not.
Did this thread influence your decision or did you have other info?
Did you happen to measure the thickness of the link itself, stock vs. AMG? IS the AMG thicker?
I'm trying to decide if I should replace the stock ones with the AMG ones....
Also, I'm not clear how the end links play into the overall handling of the car. Anyone out there explain this? And how the thickness of the end links effects handling AND is there an effect on alignment? Is putting the AMG bars in without the end links a waste?
more info please
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#43
Super Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: SF South Bay
Posts: 844
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2002 C230 Coupe
The end links will not affect handling (well... technically they do in the microscopic scale when the diameters are different so elongation will be different), but they affect safety!
My point is: if the stock C240 end links has the same diameter as the C230, I'll go ahead and change them to AMGs.
My point is: if the stock C240 end links has the same diameter as the C230, I'll go ahead and change them to AMGs.
#44
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 2,465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2002 C230 K
Originally posted by 20FHK02
The end links will not affect handling (well... technically they do in the microscopic scale when the diameters are different so elongation will be different), but they affect safety!
The end links will not affect handling (well... technically they do in the microscopic scale when the diameters are different so elongation will be different), but they affect safety!
- BT
#45
Super Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: SF South Bay
Posts: 844
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2002 C230 Coupe
Thanks Trench!
When I really come to think about it, in a static situation: thicker sway bars only affect the bar's tendency to twist, the amount of force transferred to the end link will still be the same (excluding the weight of the sway bars). So if the stock ones are enough, then changing to AMG sways won't require new end links.
But, in a dynamic situation: a thicker bar increases its spring stiffness, which will shorten the response time of the bar so that a higher shock force will be transmmitted to the end link. So ultimately it is safe to also change to AMG end links
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
When I really come to think about it, in a static situation: thicker sway bars only affect the bar's tendency to twist, the amount of force transferred to the end link will still be the same (excluding the weight of the sway bars). So if the stock ones are enough, then changing to AMG sways won't require new end links.
But, in a dynamic situation: a thicker bar increases its spring stiffness, which will shorten the response time of the bar so that a higher shock force will be transmmitted to the end link. So ultimately it is safe to also change to AMG end links
![Big Grin](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
![Big Grin](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
Last edited by 20FHK02; 02-24-2003 at 05:12 PM.
#46
Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2002 C240 6 spd manual
I measured the end links using a caliper. I did not record the measurements.......sorry! The AMG end link was larger, but not by much. The diameters of the threads on the end links were appreciably different. The end link would have had a lot of play in it at the connection to the sway bar had I not used the AMG end link. Consequently I had to file the hole in the bracket on the strut larger to accommodate the larger size. As people have noted many times before, the resistance to rotation increase to the fourth power, so not much change in diameter is required to make a large change in resistance. You would need to run some calculations to determine if the stock C240 end link could handle the additional stress imposed on it by the sway bar.
#47
Super Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: SF South Bay
Posts: 844
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
2002 C230 Coupe
Originally posted by TXTiger
I measured the end links using a caliper. I did not record the measurements.......sorry!
I measured the end links using a caliper. I did not record the measurements.......sorry!
#50
Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2002 C240 6 spd manual
Ok, I measured the diameter of the stock end links on my C240 and the AMG end links:
Stock C240 - 9 mm
AMG C32 - 11 mm
Larger to handle the additional stress from a larger diamter bar......
Stock C240 - 9 mm
AMG C32 - 11 mm
Larger to handle the additional stress from a larger diamter bar......