C-Class (W203) 2001-2007, C160, C180, C200, C220, C230, C240, C270, C280, C300, C320, C230K, C350, Coupe

porting M271 supercharger

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 06-22-2009, 04:59 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
linkmustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
porting M271 supercharger

Anyone ported there m271 supercharger if so any power gains
Old 06-22-2009, 05:24 PM
  #2  
Super Member
 
amanonfire's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 573
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
W203
Like the OD pulley, ramming anymore air into this engine only triggers the ECU nannies.

I was going to port mine and bore the throttle body, yet without at least an ECU remap, the gains won't be worth the effort.
Old 06-22-2009, 06:29 PM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
SeaCoupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Pasadena, CA
Posts: 3,206
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
2002 C230K, 2013 BMW 328, 2015 BMW X5
I respectfully disagree amanon.

Been there and done that. But on an M111.
Old 06-22-2009, 10:25 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
LinDenKid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: East Coast
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
C230 coupe 2002
Originally Posted by emrliquidlife
I respectfully disagree amanon.

Been there and done that. But on an M111.
what kind of gains did you get emr?
Old 06-23-2009, 12:05 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
hieracity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C230 K Coupe (05)
i think mig888 has bored his throttle body. let us know what u find out
Old 06-23-2009, 12:35 PM
  #6  
Super Member
 
amanonfire's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 573
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
W203
Originally Posted by emrliquidlife
I respectfully disagree amanon.

Been there and done that. But on an M111.
He has a M271.

How can you respectfully disagree, yet only comment on a M111? Please stay on topic and don't give the OP false hopes. The M111 SC runs at 7psi, not 11 psi like the M271. So there's a LOT of room for the M111 ECU to self adjust, nevermind the ECU nannies in the M271.

Evosport gave up pulley production for this M271 cause they couldn't crack the ECU nannies. Kleemann runs the K-box to get around the ECU nannies.
Old 06-23-2009, 12:55 PM
  #7  
Member
Thread Starter
 
linkmustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Damnit I need more power hey who ported your 111 supercharger and how much was it
Old 06-23-2009, 01:44 PM
  #8  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
SeaCoupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Pasadena, CA
Posts: 3,206
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
2002 C230K, 2013 BMW 328, 2015 BMW X5
Originally Posted by amanonfire
He has a M271.

How can you respectfully disagree, yet only comment on a M111? Please stay on topic and don't give the OP false hopes. The M111 SC runs at 7psi, not 11 psi like the M271. So there's a LOT of room for the M111 ECU to self adjust, nevermind the ECU nannies in the M271.

Evosport gave up pulley production for this M271 cause they couldn't crack the ECU nannies. Kleemann runs the K-box to get around the ECU nannies.

I expected this....

Ohh right, no one running Eaton S/C have gotten gains from Porting? Wait, I'm not on topic....Sheesh.

Too a point the ECU can and will compensate. I agree the M111 had a better ability to run and compensate. I didn't need software tuning to do it. To my knowledge no one has ported an M271 motor. So the gains remain to be seen.



Link, google Steig performance. Name of the company is in the sig.

They have forgotten more about S/C performance than this board knows. They would be the experts. Last I did business with them, they have a money back guarantee. No gains, no charge. You need a before and after dyno.
Old 06-23-2009, 03:45 PM
  #9  
Member
Thread Starter
 
linkmustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
K thanks
Old 06-24-2009, 01:25 PM
  #10  
Super Member
 
amanonfire's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 573
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
W203
Originally Posted by emrliquidlife
Too a point the ECU can and will compensate. I agree the M111 had a better ability to run and compensate. I didn't need software tuning to do it. To my knowledge no one has ported an M271 motor. So the gains remain to be seen.
Lots of people have rammed more air into the engine, albeit with a large crank pulley, yet its the same principle as porting the SC.

There has been few gains on the M271. The ECU cannot compensate.
While you are correct that others have ported a MP45 SC and seen gains, no-one has done it on a Mercedes Seimens ECU for good reason.
Old 06-24-2009, 04:20 PM
  #11  
Member
Thread Starter
 
linkmustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Man this sucks I'd love to get 300 to the wheels would make my day
Old 06-24-2009, 05:03 PM
  #12  
Super Member
 
amanonfire's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 573
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
W203
Originally Posted by linkmustang
Man this sucks I'd love to get 300 to the wheels would make my day
Run standalone. My old dealership had a racing C-coupe with a heavily modded M271.

They did throw a rod through the block, so I'd question if the M271 can safely take 300 hp.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: porting M271 supercharger



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:12 PM.