C class competitor
Guest
Posts: n/a
C class competitor
i was at e46fanatics the other day and they had a pole about who there feircest competitors were
i was surprised the c class got so few votes. those b@stards! they think were nothing!
the bulk went to the g35 and the audi a4!
so what cars do guys think are our competitors? meaning the c class in general
do we even have any competetion
Ed
i was surprised the c class got so few votes. those b@stards! they think were nothing!
the bulk went to the g35 and the audi a4!
so what cars do guys think are our competitors? meaning the c class in general
do we even have any competetion
Ed
Super Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
well the g35 will get up and spank our coupe into the ground as far as power goes. it will also accelerate extremely fast once again leaving our coupe in the dust. it handles pretty damm well too. as for the a4 i dont know i havent ever driven one of these. if you see a g35 on the road, dont bother racing him as you will only see how stupid the trunk of that car looks.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,916
Likes: 1
From: The blue white rock, third out.
2002 C230 Coupe(M111)
Originally posted by nov0798
well the g35 will get up and spank our coupe into the ground as far as power goes. it will also accelerate extremely fast once again leaving our coupe in the dust. it handles pretty damm well too. as for the a4 i dont know i havent ever driven one of these. if you see a g35 on the road, dont bother racing him as you will only see how stupid the trunk of that car looks.
well the g35 will get up and spank our coupe into the ground as far as power goes. it will also accelerate extremely fast once again leaving our coupe in the dust. it handles pretty damm well too. as for the a4 i dont know i havent ever driven one of these. if you see a g35 on the road, dont bother racing him as you will only see how stupid the trunk of that car looks.
G35 rides much worse than any C- Class. Interior is cheaper looking than the Altima. Great engine thou
The A4 I don't get...its a nice car, nice interior, but in standard form its FWD, and with the 1.8 its a rather anemic 8.5 seconds to 60 even with the stick.
BMW vs. MB is like Ford vs. Chevy or Toyota vs. Honda... Who cares?
Super Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 687
Likes: 1
C320 Coupe
Originally posted by Outland
The car and driver of the G35 is so much lighter...by about $5000.
G35 rides much worse than any C- Class. Interior is cheaper looking than the Altima. Great engine thou
The A4 I don't get...its a nice car, nice interior, but in standard form its FWD, and with the 1.8 its a rather anemic 8.5 seconds to 60 even with the stick.
BMW vs. MB is like Ford vs. Chevy or Toyota vs. Honda... Who cares?
The car and driver of the G35 is so much lighter...by about $5000.
G35 rides much worse than any C- Class. Interior is cheaper looking than the Altima. Great engine thou
The A4 I don't get...its a nice car, nice interior, but in standard form its FWD, and with the 1.8 its a rather anemic 8.5 seconds to 60 even with the stick.
BMW vs. MB is like Ford vs. Chevy or Toyota vs. Honda... Who cares?
Trending Topics
Banned
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
W203
that's right!!!
Originally posted by Outland
BMW vs. MB is like Ford vs. Chevy or Toyota vs. Honda... Who cares?
BMW vs. MB is like Ford vs. Chevy or Toyota vs. Honda... Who cares?
exactly!!! That was put excellently!!! Even though MB's quality has declined from the very dependable 300 D Turbodiesel, they are still great!
MB World Stories
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Dubai Tuner Gives the Mercedes G-Class An Entirely New Look
Verdad Gallardo
Six Gift Ideas Your AMG Loving Dad or Grad Will Cherish
7 Craziest Things AMG Gas Ever Built
Verdad Gallardo
New Electric Mercedes-AMG GT 4-Door Coupe Unveiled: 10 Things You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)
Verdad Gallardo
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren
Verdad Gallardo
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine
Verdad Gallardo
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction
Verdad Gallardo
MBworld Guru
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 22,058
Likes: 19
From: Diamond Bar, CA
W206 PHEV AMG
Originally posted by Sloth
In Sydney, E46's are everywhere. Really sick of seeing them, especially the Hyundai looking rear ends !
We say they are like butts - cos everybody has one !
In Sydney, E46's are everywhere. Really sick of seeing them, especially the Hyundai looking rear ends !
We say they are like butts - cos everybody has one !
IMO C-class in general is no competitor in the performance sector against the A4 and the 3er or the G35. Luxury wise, yes, the C-class will be better than the 3 and G35, but it's still behind the A4.
Last edited by FrankW; Feb 19, 2003 at 01:41 AM.
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,916
Likes: 1
From: The blue white rock, third out.
2002 C230 Coupe(M111)
Originally posted by Xeon
A4 1.8 does 0-60 in 8.5? i dont think so...7.5 maybe..
I drove the A4, e46, IS300, and G35
Performance wise - G35
Interior- C
Exterior-E46 or C class
A4 1.8 does 0-60 in 8.5? i dont think so...7.5 maybe..
I drove the A4, e46, IS300, and G35
Performance wise - G35
Interior- C
Exterior-E46 or C class
The A4 feels quick when the boost comes up, but there's so little there until it spools up.
Anywho, I found this over at Edmunds...looks like were both off half a second.
0-60 Acceleration
Infiniti G35 6.1 sec.
BMW 330i 7.0 sec.
Lexus IS 300 7.2 sec.
Volvo S40 7.8 sec.
Acura TL 8.0 sec.
Audi A4 8.0 sec.
Chrysler 300M 8.0 sec.
BMW 325i 8.1 sec.
Lexus ES 300 8.1 sec.
Mercedes-Benz C240 9.2 sec.
This is from Motorweek
2002 Audi A4
Engine 1.8 liter, DOHC, 20-valve, turbocharged in-line 4
Horsepower 170
Torque 166 lb feet
0-60 mph 8.0 seconds
1/4 mile 16.3 seconds @ 85 mph
60-0 mph 131 feet
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 378
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
I'm surprised no one mentioned the new Jaguar 3.0 X-type sport! I looove that car. Well, the AWD 3.0L Sport costs $58k CDN so it's pretty expensive, but the 2.something L is cheaper, only $41k, and it comes with more options than a C. I'd consider that over a C240 for sure. I remember seeing on the option sheet that a sport package cost, what was it, $5000 maybe? Or was it $3000? Forgot, but tack that onto the $41k base price and it's still decently priced, for AWD, and looks (but no power).
If i were to choose from that list of cars though, I'd pick the S40. Just realized how cheap it is compared to a C, decent (in fact, good) performance, and well, decent looks. Unless I manage to get the replica BTCC bodykit from Europe, now that changes things!
If i were to choose from that list of cars though, I'd pick the S40. Just realized how cheap it is compared to a C, decent (in fact, good) performance, and well, decent looks. Unless I manage to get the replica BTCC bodykit from Europe, now that changes things!
