722.6 transmission and converter lock-up question
#77
Super Member
Thread Starter
it appears that the '02 style TCU that i have cannot be flashed with '03 software.
i'm thinking about trying out the '03+ TCU, jerry@let seemed to have good luck with it.
i'm thinking about trying out the '03+ TCU, jerry@let seemed to have good luck with it.
#78
Super Moderator
![](https://staticssl.ibsrv.net/autocomm/Content/MB/mbwambassador2.gif)
Sorry - I did not know about the older TCU. I know that FrankW has a new TCU on his car - I wonder if he has this problem? My 1998 Merc must have had the older TCU but I did very low mileage - 6000Km from new - on that car before I sold it because the company moved me to Australia. I did not really get into the vehicle as a result.
#79
Super Member
Thread Starter
i just wanted to give a small update on my findings. i dont usually drive my car for more than 15-20 mins.
if i drive the car for more than 30 mins continuously, hard or soft, i get no clunks for the rest of the day! in other words, in the first 20-30 minutes of starting the car from stone cold, this is where all of the clunking appears to be happening.
i'm not sure what this means.
if i drive the car for more than 30 mins continuously, hard or soft, i get no clunks for the rest of the day! in other words, in the first 20-30 minutes of starting the car from stone cold, this is where all of the clunking appears to be happening.
i'm not sure what this means.
#80
Super Moderator
![](https://staticssl.ibsrv.net/autocomm/Content/MB/mbwambassador2.gif)
It must be the adaptive learning. If it really does not do it at all for the rest of the day it can't be fluid temperature related unless the car is never allowed to cool down.
![nix](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/nixweiss.gif)
#81
Super Member
My '02 is an early build (four dealerships have told me they can't flash the TCU) with 93K and at ~70K, no ATF/coolant contam. However, my car has (and exhibits on a very regular basis) ALL of the thump/jerk issues. 1500RPM from a start, the weird-*** RPM drop after cruising, seemingly excessive holding of gears quite often after hard acceleration, etc...
I've been reading about these issues since the start of my ownership and have pressed hard for work each and every time I've taken the car in for extended warranty service. Sadly, all it's resulted with regards to these issues is a free glycol test and a TCU replacement which seemed to fix everything. Actually, it *did* fix everything to a point where I had to completely re-examine my driving style... for 1400 miles. After that, the 1500 jerk came back and gets worse if I don't "flash" the ECU every 2-3 weeks. The RPM drop is there just the same as before, and I won't even go into the delayed or occasional mushy/neck-breaking shifts.
Again, however, I've had two different dealerships check out pretty much everything that delivers power to the ground past the motor and... it's all "fine". I've driven it, and been driven by, one of the senior techs *and* the service director (after a lot of careful *****ing
![Wink](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
Anyway, I'm rambling away from the point I was trying to make, so here's the TL;DR version:
- Early 2K2, 93K miles, Glycol test at ~70K was negative.
- 1500RPM jerk and 30-40MPH cruising TC lockup RPM-drop since I got the car (57K).
- None of the problems at WOT or at least %75+.
- TCU replaced before 60K, fixed problems completely for 1400 miles, then came back slowly to full-force. Problems have remained since then.
- Engine/Tranny/TC/diff... are still all tip-top currently, according to two dealerships, but... the problems still remain
![action](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/action1.gif)
Next order of business - try and get the TCU replaced again by the same dealer as a rework and see if it temporarily fixes the problems again. C'mooon extended warranty, let's push for $7k
![devil](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/devil.gif)
Last edited by evilsaint; 03-06-2010 at 09:50 PM.
#82
Super Member
Thread Starter
Sorry to half necro this thread, but I'm of the same mind as many in this thread - it's all about the TCU or its adaptations.
My '02 is an early build (four dealerships have told me they can't flash the TCU) with 93K and at ~70K, no ATF/coolant contam. However, my car has (and exhibits on a very regular basis) ALL of the thump/jerk issues. 1500RPM from a start, the weird-*** RPM drop after cruising, seemingly excessive holding of gears quite often after hard acceleration, etc...
I've been reading about these issues since the start of my ownership and have pressed hard for work each and every time I've taken the car in for extended warranty service. Sadly, all it's resulted with regards to these issues is a free glycol test and a TCU replacement which seemed to fix everything. Actually, it *did* fix everything to a point where I had to completely re-examine my driving style... for 1400 miles. After that, the 1500 jerk came back and gets worse if I don't "flash" the ECU every 2-3 weeks. The RPM drop is there just the same as before, and I won't even go into the delayed or occasional mushy/neck-breaking shifts.
Again, however, I've had two different dealerships check out pretty much everything that delivers power to the ground past the motor and... it's all "fine". I've driven it, and been driven by, one of the senior techs *and* the service director (after a lot of careful *****ing
), so after replicating both of the problems for both of them, I trust that they really have performed all the non-invasive troubleshooting that they've talked about having done, yet I still have no concrete answers. Nothing strange in STAR, no CELs, no crazy metal grindings in the ATF (nor coolant, thank God), no strange sounds or vibrations - just these two weird-*** problems.
Anyway, I'm rambling away from the point I was trying to make, so here's the TL;DR version:
- Early 2K2, 93K miles, Glycol test at ~70K was negative.
- 1500RPM jerk and 30-40MPH cruising TC lockup RPM-drop since I got the car (57K).
- None of the problems at WOT or at least %75+.
- TCU replaced before 60K, fixed problems completely for 1400 miles, then came back slowly to full-force. Problems have remained since then.
- Engine/Tranny/TC/diff... are still all tip-top currently, according to two dealerships, but... the problems still remain![action](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/action1.gif)
Next order of business - try and get the TCU replaced again by the same dealer as a rework and see if it temporarily fixes the problems again. C'mooon extended warranty, let's push for $7k![devil](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/devil.gif)
My '02 is an early build (four dealerships have told me they can't flash the TCU) with 93K and at ~70K, no ATF/coolant contam. However, my car has (and exhibits on a very regular basis) ALL of the thump/jerk issues. 1500RPM from a start, the weird-*** RPM drop after cruising, seemingly excessive holding of gears quite often after hard acceleration, etc...
I've been reading about these issues since the start of my ownership and have pressed hard for work each and every time I've taken the car in for extended warranty service. Sadly, all it's resulted with regards to these issues is a free glycol test and a TCU replacement which seemed to fix everything. Actually, it *did* fix everything to a point where I had to completely re-examine my driving style... for 1400 miles. After that, the 1500 jerk came back and gets worse if I don't "flash" the ECU every 2-3 weeks. The RPM drop is there just the same as before, and I won't even go into the delayed or occasional mushy/neck-breaking shifts.
Again, however, I've had two different dealerships check out pretty much everything that delivers power to the ground past the motor and... it's all "fine". I've driven it, and been driven by, one of the senior techs *and* the service director (after a lot of careful *****ing
![Wink](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
Anyway, I'm rambling away from the point I was trying to make, so here's the TL;DR version:
- Early 2K2, 93K miles, Glycol test at ~70K was negative.
- 1500RPM jerk and 30-40MPH cruising TC lockup RPM-drop since I got the car (57K).
- None of the problems at WOT or at least %75+.
- TCU replaced before 60K, fixed problems completely for 1400 miles, then came back slowly to full-force. Problems have remained since then.
- Engine/Tranny/TC/diff... are still all tip-top currently, according to two dealerships, but... the problems still remain
![action](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/action1.gif)
Next order of business - try and get the TCU replaced again by the same dealer as a rework and see if it temporarily fixes the problems again. C'mooon extended warranty, let's push for $7k
![devil](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/devil.gif)
![Stick Out Tongue](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
try to convince your dealer to get you an '03 tcu, do a search and you will find information on how jerry from LET got an '03 tcu into his '02 c32. he says it got rid of all these issues. i'm waiting for somebody else to try this before i blow away 300 bucks on a TCU
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
#83
Super Member
excessive holding of gears after hard acceleration is part of the AMG package, surprisingly it's actually supposed to do that. ![Stick Out Tongue](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
try to convince your dealer to get you an '03 tcu, do a search and you will find information on how jerry from LET got an '03 tcu into his '02 c32. he says it got rid of all these issues. i'm waiting for somebody else to try this before i blow away 300 bucks on a TCU![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
![Stick Out Tongue](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/tongue.gif)
try to convince your dealer to get you an '03 tcu, do a search and you will find information on how jerry from LET got an '03 tcu into his '02 c32. he says it got rid of all these issues. i'm waiting for somebody else to try this before i blow away 300 bucks on a TCU
![Smilie](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Only $300 for a TCU? Can we replace 'em ourselves, or would it need rewiring? Stealership would probably charge an arm and a leg, but I wonder if FMU would be up to the task? I'd put $450 on the table for the chance at not having my spine further screwed up at 9/10 green lights
![Big Grin](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#85
Super Member
Thread Starter
#86
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Corona, CA
Posts: 5,034
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
6 Posts
03 g35 coupe...........02 c32 Sold
you just need the star machine. I bought a brand new c32 tcu from pshek, so i assume its for a 04, trying to fix my esp problem. It worked fine in my 02, it didn't fix my esp problem, but it works the same as before.
#87
Super Member
What all did you have to change around using the SDS to adapt it to your '02?
#89
Super Moderator
Recently flushed and filled the gearbox with 236.14-specification fluid during the course of routine preventative maintenance.
Immediately noticed a marked improvement in lock-up abruptness during its initial leak check/fluid level verification shakedown cruise.
Better living through chemistry…could it be too good to be true?
After having driven with it in there for several thousand miles (with no adaptation reset), I’ve come to appreciate its gentlemanly light-load shift characteristics. WOT upshifts occur with alacrity heretofore not enjoyed with my 722.6. Its newfound upside is that it’ll bark ‘em on occasion. Never mind those SMG guys.
Although the torque converter’s lock-up abruptness hasn’t been entirely mitigated, it’s improved on the order of at least half, placebo effect notwithstanding. Not sure which friction modifiers and whatnot Fuchs blended in its Titan 4134 ATF, but their formulation most certainly works well in a modified C32.
Given that it’s also approved for use in MB’s latest DCTs was rationale enough to give it a go.
At >$150 for some 14 liters required during a complete TQ/VB flush -including the requisite OE filter, seal, gasket and sundry consumables necessary- it’s a damn sight less expensive than dicking around with so-called TCU/EGS or hardware upgrades. YMMV.
Immediately noticed a marked improvement in lock-up abruptness during its initial leak check/fluid level verification shakedown cruise.
Better living through chemistry…could it be too good to be true?
After having driven with it in there for several thousand miles (with no adaptation reset), I’ve come to appreciate its gentlemanly light-load shift characteristics. WOT upshifts occur with alacrity heretofore not enjoyed with my 722.6. Its newfound upside is that it’ll bark ‘em on occasion. Never mind those SMG guys.
Although the torque converter’s lock-up abruptness hasn’t been entirely mitigated, it’s improved on the order of at least half, placebo effect notwithstanding. Not sure which friction modifiers and whatnot Fuchs blended in its Titan 4134 ATF, but their formulation most certainly works well in a modified C32.
Given that it’s also approved for use in MB’s latest DCTs was rationale enough to give it a go.
At >$150 for some 14 liters required during a complete TQ/VB flush -including the requisite OE filter, seal, gasket and sundry consumables necessary- it’s a damn sight less expensive than dicking around with so-called TCU/EGS or hardware upgrades. YMMV.
#91
Super Moderator
![](https://staticssl.ibsrv.net/autocomm/Content/MB/mbwambassador2.gif)
Recently flushed and filled the gearbox with 236.14-specification fluid during the course of routine preventative maintenance.
Immediately noticed a marked improvement in lock-up abruptness during its initial leak check/fluid level verification shakedown cruise.
Better living through chemistry…could it be too good to be true?
After having driven with it in there for several thousand miles (with no adaptation reset), I’ve come to appreciate its gentlemanly light-load shift characteristics. WOT upshifts occur with alacrity heretofore not enjoyed with my 722.6. Its newfound upside is that it’ll bark ‘em on occasion. Never mind those SMG guys.
Although the torque converter’s lock-up abruptness hasn’t been entirely mitigated, it’s improved on the order of at least half, placebo effect notwithstanding. Not sure which friction modifiers and whatnot Fuchs blended in its Titan 4134 ATF, but their formulation most certainly works well in a modified C32.
Given that it’s also approved for use in MB’s latest DCTs was rationale enough to give it a go.
At >$150 for some 14 liters required during a complete TQ/VB flush -including the requisite OE filter, seal, gasket and sundry consumables necessary- it’s a damn sight less expensive than dicking around with so-called TCU/EGS or hardware upgrades. YMMV.
Immediately noticed a marked improvement in lock-up abruptness during its initial leak check/fluid level verification shakedown cruise.
Better living through chemistry…could it be too good to be true?
After having driven with it in there for several thousand miles (with no adaptation reset), I’ve come to appreciate its gentlemanly light-load shift characteristics. WOT upshifts occur with alacrity heretofore not enjoyed with my 722.6. Its newfound upside is that it’ll bark ‘em on occasion. Never mind those SMG guys.
Although the torque converter’s lock-up abruptness hasn’t been entirely mitigated, it’s improved on the order of at least half, placebo effect notwithstanding. Not sure which friction modifiers and whatnot Fuchs blended in its Titan 4134 ATF, but their formulation most certainly works well in a modified C32.
Given that it’s also approved for use in MB’s latest DCTs was rationale enough to give it a go.
At >$150 for some 14 liters required during a complete TQ/VB flush -including the requisite OE filter, seal, gasket and sundry consumables necessary- it’s a damn sight less expensive than dicking around with so-called TCU/EGS or hardware upgrades. YMMV.
![rolf](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/rofl.gif)
#92
Super Member
Thread Starter
Recently flushed and filled the gearbox with 236.14-specification fluid during the course of routine preventative maintenance.
Immediately noticed a marked improvement in lock-up abruptness during its initial leak check/fluid level verification shakedown cruise.
Better living through chemistry…could it be too good to be true?
After having driven with it in there for several thousand miles (with no adaptation reset), I’ve come to appreciate its gentlemanly light-load shift characteristics. WOT upshifts occur with alacrity heretofore not enjoyed with my 722.6. Its newfound upside is that it’ll bark ‘em on occasion. Never mind those SMG guys.
Although the torque converter’s lock-up abruptness hasn’t been entirely mitigated, it’s improved on the order of at least half, placebo effect notwithstanding. Not sure which friction modifiers and whatnot Fuchs blended in its Titan 4134 ATF, but their formulation most certainly works well in a modified C32.
Given that it’s also approved for use in MB’s latest DCTs was rationale enough to give it a go.
At >$150 for some 14 liters required during a complete TQ/VB flush -including the requisite OE filter, seal, gasket and sundry consumables necessary- it’s a damn sight less expensive than dicking around with so-called TCU/EGS or hardware upgrades. YMMV.
Immediately noticed a marked improvement in lock-up abruptness during its initial leak check/fluid level verification shakedown cruise.
Better living through chemistry…could it be too good to be true?
After having driven with it in there for several thousand miles (with no adaptation reset), I’ve come to appreciate its gentlemanly light-load shift characteristics. WOT upshifts occur with alacrity heretofore not enjoyed with my 722.6. Its newfound upside is that it’ll bark ‘em on occasion. Never mind those SMG guys.
Although the torque converter’s lock-up abruptness hasn’t been entirely mitigated, it’s improved on the order of at least half, placebo effect notwithstanding. Not sure which friction modifiers and whatnot Fuchs blended in its Titan 4134 ATF, but their formulation most certainly works well in a modified C32.
Given that it’s also approved for use in MB’s latest DCTs was rationale enough to give it a go.
At >$150 for some 14 liters required during a complete TQ/VB flush -including the requisite OE filter, seal, gasket and sundry consumables necessary- it’s a damn sight less expensive than dicking around with so-called TCU/EGS or hardware upgrades. YMMV.
![nix](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/nixweiss.gif)
#96
With all the research thats been done, you would think someone would be able to secure 03+ TCUs and program them for earlier models outside the dealership. I am sure many C32 owners would be happy to pay for this modification.
#98
Super Member
Thread Starter
It's not just gear 1. During the first 10-15 minutes of each drive, if you let off the gas below 40mph and then get back on the gas. The converter lets the RPM's rise and then slams them back down as it locks up hard. Annoying...
#99
Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
E320 CDI
Did you take a look at the Gear 1 lock-up adaptation in DAS? I think it is a temperate related adaptation. You have to start with the car <20C. and finish the process when transmission is at 80C.
#100
Super Moderator
![](https://staticssl.ibsrv.net/autocomm/Content/MB/mbwambassador2.gif)
Dingle - I think the only possible way around this issue is to get the newer TCU that can be reflashed. Frank has the new one & never complains with his C32.
If your problem was the good old 722.6 taxi hassle with the first to second one way clutch starting to fail it would bang through the 1st to second gear change everytime in S mode & not happen at all in C or W mode. (because the car would pull away in second gear.)
If your problem was the good old 722.6 taxi hassle with the first to second one way clutch starting to fail it would bang through the 1st to second gear change everytime in S mode & not happen at all in C or W mode. (because the car would pull away in second gear.)