C-Class (W203) 2001-2007, C160, C180, C200, C220, C230, C240, C270, C280, C300, C320, C230K, C350, Coupe

continental dws versus falken fk 452

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 05-02-2011, 09:02 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
fran6co's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C240
continental dws versus falken fk 452

continental dws versus falken fk 452....with one to buy ?

thanks
Old 05-02-2011, 10:26 PM
  #2  
Super Member
 
rocafel1a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 544
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
05.C230K.SS
here's my 2cents. i was running falken fk452 235/35/19 in the front & 265/30/19 in the rear on my 203 with lowered suspension. After about 10k miles, the rears were pretty much slicks and a goner. Performance-wise, they weren't that great because every time it rained, my ESP light would come on. It slipped alot each time i accelerated from 0mph in rainy weather. but when it's dry, the tires aree pretty grippy, as i can corner and drive more aggressively.

Now, i replaced my falkens with the conti dws in the rear, and it's night and day. no more slipping when it rains. idk about tire tread life though. i've had these for less than 1k miles. but i really like these better than the falkens.

my fronts are still falkens. can't really tell you how good they are, but after 10k miles, there aren't signs of wearing yet.

falkens are obviously cheaper than the contis, but you're paying for better quality in the contis. i think it's like $100 or so more expensive but i'd go for contis if you want more sticky tires.
Old 05-02-2011, 10:59 PM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Mka77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Witness Protection Program
Posts: 1,314
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
06 CLK350 -SOLD! 2010 Cadillac SRX Premium Turbo
I have ran both and think they are fairly similar. The advantage to the DWS is it's all season and do wear better than the 452. Rears burning up at 10k could have been a camber issue. Went 28k on the 452's and 31k on the DWS on a staggered setup, but I have a camber kit installed. Either are a pretty good choice.
Old 05-03-2011, 04:32 AM
  #4  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
phister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: fort worth, tx
Posts: 5,054
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
06 C230 SS 6spd
its hard to compare since one is all season and the other is a performance tire. If you're looking for a better comparison look for the Continental DW. Or you can try the Hankook V12 evo k110, great bang for the buck. I also like the Yokohama S.drive and I'm on the Bridgestone RE760 right now and I enjoy very much.
Old 05-03-2011, 03:04 PM
  #5  
Super Member
 
rocafel1a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 544
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
05.C230K.SS
scratch that...i had the Conti DW not DWS (from my earlier post)

and yes i have rear negative camber
Old 05-03-2011, 07:00 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
contact148's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
2003 c240 4matic wagon
I have the conti dws on my c240 4matic wagon


have about 3K km on them and im likeing them alot so far quite nice ride have run them in heavy rain and dry city and hwy

very happy so far
Old 05-03-2011, 07:37 PM
  #7  
Junior Member
 
Jack_2001C240's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2001 C240
I plan on installing Conti DWS also on my 2001 C240 that is still on it's factory Michelan tires. I have read the DWS are good for snow anti-lock braking. The original Michelan Energy Plus tires are only good on dry pavement or maybe rain. In snow the anti-lock brakes just keep pulsating for very long stopping distances. Dangerous and scary. And I am not an aggressive driver. There is still ample thread on them at 46000 city miles, but they are almost 10 years old and I think the rubber might dry out or go bad.
Old 05-03-2011, 08:57 PM
  #8  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
C230 Mulac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 1,545
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
1999 E320 4matic Wagon, 2005 C55 AMG - sold, 1998 VW Jetta TDI - sold, 2006 C230 Sport - Totaled :(
continental makes very good tires, the dws is a good all season tire. i've got that on my black wheels but i'm gonna switch them out this summer to michelin ps2, which i would recommend for a good summer performance tire. then i'll get some bridgestone blizzaks on my stock wheels for winter driving. if you have two sets of wheels, definitely use one for summer and one for winter and don't worry about getting all seasons like conti dws. if you want to go for continentals, get the contisport contact, that's what my stock wheels came with the those things grip extremely well. but they absolutely suck in the snow, almost got me in a wreck once
Old 05-04-2011, 06:40 PM
  #9  
Member
Thread Starter
 
fran6co's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C240
thanks
Old 05-05-2011, 01:41 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
jtwillia2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2005 C230K
My mom is the website administrator for Continental Tire North America. They really do make great tires, and are far underrated. Here in America they just don't really get the exposure they should, but Conti's in Europe are like Michelins to us (in terms of popularity) - that's why they're OEM for many Porsches and Ferrari's nowadays, aside from the aforementioned fact that they're great tires! Don't know what size you're looking for, but General also makes some decent tires for how much they cost, like the Altimax HP and Exclaim UHP. General used to be somewhat of a sub-brand of Continental but I think they've kinda separated now.
Old 05-05-2011, 11:32 AM
  #11  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
C230 Mulac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 1,545
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
1999 E320 4matic Wagon, 2005 C55 AMG - sold, 1998 VW Jetta TDI - sold, 2006 C230 Sport - Totaled :(
Originally Posted by jtwillia2
My mom is the website administrator for Continental Tire North America. They really do make great tires, and are far underrated. Here in America they just don't really get the exposure they should, but Conti's in Europe are like Michelins to us (in terms of popularity) - that's why they're OEM for many Porsches and Ferrari's nowadays, aside from the aforementioned fact that they're great tires! Don't know what size you're looking for, but General also makes some decent tires for how much they cost, like the Altimax HP and Exclaim UHP. General used to be somewhat of a sub-brand of Continental but I think they've kinda separated now.
+1 continentals are great, they stick like glue, even the all-seasons perform well for an all-season tire. but i like to go for the summer performance

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: continental dws versus falken fk 452



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:52 AM.