New E-class looks alot like C-class...
E class pics here:
http://mbspy.basm.be/w211fipho.htm
The Sonata:
Last edited by Mike T.; Feb 17, 2002 at 07:46 PM.
Trending Topics
You think these two look alike?!?
(typo is not mine, found this on the web)
I was approaching one of these Sonatas on the higway and could have sworn from the rear 3/4 view that it was a Jag X.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
I was approaching one of these Sonatas on the higway and could have sworn from the rear 3/4 view that it was a Jag X.
Thanks for the side-by-side comparo. pics Flashman.
I was approaching one of these Sonatas on the higway and could have sworn from the rear 3/4 view that it was a Jag X.
I do like the current E, but the new one looks fresher. The side profile does look very much like a C. I see M-B is going for a slightly rounder taillamp design, both on the E and the new SL. I kind of like the more angular look of the current C and SLK taillights.
I am not a big fan of the new E's avantgarde (sport) front bumpers, but this Brabus body kit for the new E-Class is another story altogether!
-G'day-
Last edited by C-Kompii; Feb 17, 2002 at 11:16 PM.
i have to say that the conceptual sketch at mbspy is more compelling to me.

however, i am definitely convinced about the technology in the new e-class (making the current e-class seem a bit primitive). the interior looks very good except for those big dials for the A/C? on the top of the dash. the speedometer is great! throw in the panoramic moonroof, a wagon version w/ seating for 7, and it is good!
Last edited by young; Feb 17, 2002 at 11:31 PM.
sure the Lexus GS owners will think MB stole "their" front end look but...E class was around before the GS...plus the E back end KILLS the GS taillights !!!
From a distance, (say 1/10th mile) I am still mistaking the front end of a C-Class for an S-Class. You don't get the appearance of size from a distance and the grills are similar... I am surprised when I get closer it turns out to be a C... This is really odd, because the headlights on the two are very different.
In contrast, the rear views of the C and S are almost identical in details, yet I can tell the difference from a distance much more easily than the front views.
It's not important to me at all whether my C-Class sedan looks like a mini S-Class. I simply do have a problem telling the two apart FROM A DISTANCE. Have any of you made similar observations?
IMO, I like the side profile and rear views of the new E. But I wish MB had taken more of a gamble with the headlights. Now that the S-Class, C-Class and others have started the whole amoeba-look with their headlights, I find the headlights on the current E and CLK to be boring, dated. So, for me the new E will represent a sidestep rather than a step forward...
In contrast, the rear views of the C and S are almost identical in details, yet I can tell the difference from a distance much more easily than the front views.
It's not important to me at all whether my C-Class sedan looks like a mini S-Class. I simply do have a problem telling the two apart FROM A DISTANCE. Have any of you made similar observations?
The rears of the C-Class and S-Class are easy to tell apart once you realize there's a chrome strip above the license plate area on the S, but the design is almost identical.
As for C and S's, it's hard to tell them apart except for the chrome strip on the trunk lid.
From the side view though (close up), a C looks like a squished-S. Not as bad though as an Audi TT, which looks like a squished VW Bug...
I disagree with Oneslip though on the roof! If they offered the panoramic roof, I don't think I could buy one without it!


