C-Class (W203) 2001-2007, C160, C180, C200, C220, C230, C240, C270, C280, C300, C320, C230K, C350, Coupe

Skidpad Benchmark

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 08-27-2003, 06:44 AM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
KL316's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: LA, California
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
03 silver C32 AMG
Question Skidpad Benchmark

guys, wut does the skidpad benchmark mean?

like when magazines show .86g .87g etc....

wut does it represent?

does it represent a cars ability to hug the floor?
Old 08-27-2003, 06:51 AM
  #2  
Bos
Member
 
Bos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2002 C230K
In a nutshell... yes. The number represents the amount of lateral G force. High performance type consumer cars are in the 1g range, while Indy / GTP cars can reach and exceed 3g.
Old 08-27-2003, 08:24 AM
  #3  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
TimmyC230boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Sitting behind thing freakin desk of mine. Dreaming I was playing my Taylors, and driving my Benz. Long Live The VRAA!!!!!!
Posts: 2,924
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
C230 Sports Coupe
Yeah, the highner number the better. I believe the Z06, and cars of that caliber are in the 1.0G range. I belive the coupe is in the .8 range.
Old 08-27-2003, 09:26 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
czachari's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Stamford, CT
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2003 C230
Suvs are in the .5->.7, cars from .7->.8

Sports cars .8->.9, All out sports cars .9->1.

Tires have a lot to do with lateral grip. For example, putting slicks on a car can easily increase its lateral grip by .1

CZ
Old 08-27-2003, 12:58 PM
  #5  
Super Member
 
Vince's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Agoura Hills, CA
Posts: 570
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C230K
has anyone read about or noticed how the lateral acceleration is drastically different depending on the way you turn (ie left opposed to right)? I read about that a while back.

Side note. I used to have a Neon ACR that pulled over 1g STOCK.
Old 08-27-2003, 04:04 PM
  #6  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
trench's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 2,465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2002 C230 K
Originally posted by Vince
has anyone read about or noticed how the lateral acceleration is drastically different depending on the way you turn (ie left opposed to right)? I read about that a while back.
I think Road and Track mentioned this, it was a surprising difference, on the order of 0.5 g.
Old 08-27-2003, 04:15 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
KOMPRESSORnSC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: New Castle, IN
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
C230Kompressor
Originally posted by trench
I think Road and Track mentioned this, it was a surprising difference, on the order of 0.5 g.
I can see weight distribution (L/R) because of the driver making a difference, and driver confidence making a difference, but I can't imagine what else would cause it? I'm more comfortable turning left, but I'm working on my righties.
Old 08-27-2003, 05:08 PM
  #8  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
trench's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 2,465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2002 C230 K
Originally posted by KOMPRESSORnSC
I can see weight distribution (L/R) because of the driver making a difference, and driver confidence making a difference, but I can't imagine what else would cause it? I'm more comfortable turning left, but I'm working on my righties.
I was under the impression that the Road and Track testers were quite perplexed about the skidpad numbers. Since they specifically mentioned the difference, it leads me to beleive that most cars are probably close to the same figure for either direction, and the variation seen with the Coupe was somewhat of a mystery to them.
Old 08-27-2003, 05:17 PM
  #9  
Super Member
 
dswildfire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Encino
Posts: 988
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2002 C230K
the skidpad numbers for the coupe are 0.82 ccw and 0.75 cw. and tires and road conditions do affect the skidpad rating. however, i'm somewhat doubtful that the coupe's is 0.82. i would guess it to be at least 0.85, only based on the fact that the altima i had had a skidpad of 0.81, and with the same michelin tires (energy mxv+ 205/55/16, 91h) could take a particular turn at 40mph before squealing. the coupe can take that turn at 45mph before squealing. nothing scientific. just my wag.

but some magazines have also mentioned that the stability programs on cars tend to make the skidpad number lower than the car is capable of, and if tested without stability control, the cars can see some improvement. but do not try this at home. remember that they have a nice big tarmac with a circle painted on, so if they slide uncontrollably, they have plenty of space and wont hit anything. whereas the usual smattering of trees and people can make this hazardous to do on the road.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Skidpad Benchmark



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:11 AM.