Paint chips
11-20-2001, 09:53 PM
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Paint chips
Currently on the M-class mailing list a discussion is ongoing concerning paint chips. The list seems divided-some say the M-class is no worse that other cars and others say the M-class is much more prone to chipping. I own an M-class and a C-Coupe and in my experience the M-class acquired more (actually many more) chips in the first few months than my C-coupe has in its first few months. The C-coupe paint seems to be of a better quality and better applied. What is the experience of other C-class owners with chipping?
11-20-2001, 10:41 PM
#2
Super Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2002 Mercedes-Benz C230 Kompressor Sports Coupe
Do you mean by 'chipping' a small white dot indicating some rock has hit hard enough to dig under the paint, or do you mean a flake of paint has come off?
The first is a sign of one car having thinner paint, softer paint, or both when compared to the other car. The second is a sign of improper paint bonding (a serious problem that could later on lead to whole sections peeling off).
If it is the first one, it sounds like the M-Class factory is applying thinner and/or softer paint than the C-Class factory.
A thicker coat of wax will help reduce future 'chipping' by adding an additional layer of protection, however wear. If you are really concerned, take a look at http://www.stongard.com/ for 3M industrial strength protection for the front nose of your M or C-Class. I'm seriously considering it for my C Coupe.
Rick
The first is a sign of one car having thinner paint, softer paint, or both when compared to the other car. The second is a sign of improper paint bonding (a serious problem that could later on lead to whole sections peeling off).
If it is the first one, it sounds like the M-Class factory is applying thinner and/or softer paint than the C-Class factory.
A thicker coat of wax will help reduce future 'chipping' by adding an additional layer of protection, however wear. If you are really concerned, take a look at http://www.stongard.com/ for 3M industrial strength protection for the front nose of your M or C-Class. I'm seriously considering it for my C Coupe.
Rick
11-21-2001, 01:23 AM
#3
Almost a Member!
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Mid Atlantic
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'02 C240/6
Originally posted by Flashman
Do you mean by 'chipping' a small white dot indicating some rock has hit hard enough to dig under the paint, or do you mean a flake of paint has come off?
The first is a sign of one car having thinner paint, softer paint, or both when compared to the other car. The second is a sign of improper paint bonding (a serious problem that could later on lead to whole sections peeling off).
Rick
Do you mean by 'chipping' a small white dot indicating some rock has hit hard enough to dig under the paint, or do you mean a flake of paint has come off?
The first is a sign of one car having thinner paint, softer paint, or both when compared to the other car. The second is a sign of improper paint bonding (a serious problem that could later on lead to whole sections peeling off).
Rick
11-21-2001, 04:14 AM
#4
Out Of Control!!
MB paint sucks due to the EPA regulations governing what can and can not be used. Nowadays, paint is water-based and chips like crazy. My dad has a 92 SL, he doesn't have the new paint... He has absolutely no chips, and has never had a paint job. Go figure.
11-21-2001, 11:53 PM
#5
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 738
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'01 C240/6
I could see how the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency, a US government agency) could affect MLs (which are made in the US),
but,
how would the EPA have jurisdiction over how a German car company assembles/paints its cars in Germany?? Why would the US EPA even care about air pollution in Germany?
Maybe that's why the US made ML has inferior paint. I know that US made BMWs (like the Z3) are known for having weak paint. My friend's Z3 will chip if you look at it too hard.
but,
how would the EPA have jurisdiction over how a German car company assembles/paints its cars in Germany?? Why would the US EPA even care about air pollution in Germany?
Maybe that's why the US made ML has inferior paint. I know that US made BMWs (like the Z3) are known for having weak paint. My friend's Z3 will chip if you look at it too hard.
11-26-2001, 11:44 PM
#6
MBWorld Fanatic!
well, the epa would have certain requirements/regulations (like fuel efficiency) etc that the car manufacturer would need to meet in order to sell in the USA.
also, note that many euro countries are much "greener" (do they have a choice now?) than the US and MB may have just gone to a less toxic paint voluntarily.
also, note that many euro countries are much "greener" (do they have a choice now?) than the US and MB may have just gone to a less toxic paint voluntarily.
