Paint chips
The first is a sign of one car having thinner paint, softer paint, or both when compared to the other car. The second is a sign of improper paint bonding (a serious problem that could later on lead to whole sections peeling off).
If it is the first one, it sounds like the M-Class factory is applying thinner and/or softer paint than the C-Class factory.
A thicker coat of wax will help reduce future 'chipping' by adding an additional layer of protection, however wear. If you are really concerned, take a look at http://www.stongard.com/ for 3M industrial strength protection for the front nose of your M or C-Class. I'm seriously considering it for my C Coupe.
Rick
Do you mean by 'chipping' a small white dot indicating some rock has hit hard enough to dig under the paint, or do you mean a flake of paint has come off?
The first is a sign of one car having thinner paint, softer paint, or both when compared to the other car. The second is a sign of improper paint bonding (a serious problem that could later on lead to whole sections peeling off).
Rick
but,
how would the EPA have jurisdiction over how a German car company assembles/paints its cars in Germany?? Why would the US EPA even care about air pollution in Germany?
Maybe that's why the US made ML has inferior paint. I know that US made BMWs (like the Z3) are known for having weak paint. My friend's Z3 will chip if you look at it too hard.
also, note that many euro countries are much "greener" (do they have a choice now?) than the US and MB may have just gone to a less toxic paint voluntarily.



