Is it too late to order 2002 model?
Thread Starter
BANNED FOR VIOLATING TOU
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
C230k
Is it too late to order 2002 model?
I'm just wondering when's the latest I can order a 2002 C230k? I'm going to the dealer tommorow to put a deposit down so that one can be built. He says I should be able to get one, but it might be a 2003 model? Anyone know for sure when the cut off date is?
Thread Starter
BANNED FOR VIOLATING TOU
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 371
Likes: 0
C230k
Does that mean even if I order now, they must begin building before the end of May? I just want to be clear because I don't want to be stuck with a 2003 model(1.8L). Is there anything I should get from the dealer this Saturday when I go in that guarantees this?
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,465
Likes: 0
From: SF Bay Area
2002 C230 K
I think you'd be OK with a car built in May. The dealer should know exactly when the car will be built as they are given an allotment of slots to be filled. My gut feeling is it is already too late, builds are frozen about three weeks (I think officially 13 business days) prior to a build decade and considering that, orders for the third decade in May are probably already frozen (maybe they can still squeak you in though).
Good luck, BT
Good luck, BT
Last edited by trench; May 3, 2002 at 06:50 PM.
Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
From: London England
C230 AMG Sports coupe
In a state of turmoil !!!
I'm feeling really edgy about this whole (three levels of tune) 1.8 engine thing.....I should be getting my build date late in May.....I should be taking delivery about a month after that(late June),according to my dealer....Anyway,common sense tells me IF I get a 2003 engine to enjoy the better fuel economy,and supposedly higher level of refinement (lower noise level)BUT,I really dont want to accept that my little 1.8 is being pushed nearer its limits as compared to my dreamed about TRUE 2.3l engine....for those of you in the know,can you confirm that my thinking is correct and that there is more potential upgrade possibilities with the existing engines.
"There is NO substitute for Cubic Capacity".....True or False ???
"There is NO substitute for Cubic Capacity".....True or False ???
Senior Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
From: san diego, ca
C230 kompressor C2 C7
i think that all other factors being equal (they never are) there is no replacement for displacement(stolen from carrol shelby). i think if i had my choice i would prefer the 2.3 vs 1.8. but no one really knows for sure what the performance of the 1.8 is going to be. i doubt that mb would put out an engine that wasn't good. i have a question, does the 2.3 have an alumnium block or is it cast iron? if the new 1.8 has the high pressure alumnium block it my have better balance (car balance, not engine balance) and my handle slightly better?
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,377
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver Island, B.C. Canada
2005 smart cabrio; 2008 Mercedes-Benz B 200
engine block
The 2.3 four has a cast iron block; the 1.8 is aluminum, presumably made of the same alloy as Mercedes uses on their Vee engines. I think it has the "nickasil" treated bores. I guess it's a bit lighter than the 2.3, but with the extra equipment (double Lanchester balance shafts etc), the weight advantage over the old engine may be nominal.
My Dad and I were at the M-B dealer in Victoria today picking up some paperwork in advance of the car's arrival (expected in 2 weeks, built April 8th).
The salesman said that M-B Canada just "officially" advised dealers 10 days ago that the 2003 model C 230 K would have a 1.8 engine. Funny, most of us knew this was likely a couple of months ago. He said that he had to phone some people that had ordered a week or two before that "news" and tell them about the engine change, and two of the people cancelled their orders due to this new engine!
I'd call that a major over-reaction - the 1.8 probably is just fine. It's a bit slower (not much) and a fair bit less torquey, but for me it'd still good. The extra power and (more importantly) far better torque characteristics of the 2.3 is just a bonus I suppose. And the better fuel efficiency of the 1.8 apparently is not something most North Americans give a crap about...too bad, really.
My Dad and I were at the M-B dealer in Victoria today picking up some paperwork in advance of the car's arrival (expected in 2 weeks, built April 8th).
The salesman said that M-B Canada just "officially" advised dealers 10 days ago that the 2003 model C 230 K would have a 1.8 engine. Funny, most of us knew this was likely a couple of months ago. He said that he had to phone some people that had ordered a week or two before that "news" and tell them about the engine change, and two of the people cancelled their orders due to this new engine!
I'd call that a major over-reaction - the 1.8 probably is just fine. It's a bit slower (not much) and a fair bit less torquey, but for me it'd still good. The extra power and (more importantly) far better torque characteristics of the 2.3 is just a bonus I suppose. And the better fuel efficiency of the 1.8 apparently is not something most North Americans give a crap about...too bad, really.
Trending Topics
MB World Stories
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
8 Oddball Mercedes Ideas That Actually Made it to Production
Verdad Gallardo
Dubai Tuner Gives the Mercedes G-Class An Entirely New Look
Verdad Gallardo
Six Gift Ideas Your AMG Loving Dad or Grad Will Cherish
7 Craziest Things AMG Gas Ever Built
Verdad Gallardo
New Electric Mercedes-AMG GT 4-Door Coupe Unveiled: 10 Things You Need to Know
Verdad Gallardo
6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)
Verdad Gallardo
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun
Verdad Gallardo
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren
Verdad Gallardo
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine
Verdad Gallardo
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 6,211
Likes: 2
From: Laguna Niguel, CA
This is a whole new motor from MB and that's a problem in itself. I don't have the confidence in their first year of anything. I had problems with the first 190D, it was in 12 times because the throttle linkage kept melting off (too close to the exhaust manifold) and the tranmission needed replacement in a week. It was just a troublesome car. Thank goodness for the lemon law.
Also, you are not going to see performance goodies for at least a year (pullies, chips, exhaust, air filters) as vendors need to get a hold of one first and start testing. The 2.3 Coupe had a good headstart because of the SLK230 and former C230K. It took a year and half for Porterfield to come out with brake pads since the W203 C class came out. Of course if you keep it stock then it doesn't matter.
Also, you are not going to see performance goodies for at least a year (pullies, chips, exhaust, air filters) as vendors need to get a hold of one first and start testing. The 2.3 Coupe had a good headstart because of the SLK230 and former C230K. It took a year and half for Porterfield to come out with brake pads since the W203 C class came out. Of course if you keep it stock then it doesn't matter.
