Difference between C300 spt and C350
What are the major differences between the 300 spt and 350 besides the engine?
If I get the 300 I would get the P1, Pano roof, MM, IPOD and AMG 18's.
Similar setup for the 350. I think the price difference is near $4k. Not sure if the better engine would be worth the $4k as I live in L.A. and open road is hard to come by.

I didn't test-drive the 350, but I think in most (<- key word) real world situations, the power difference would have a negligible effect.
At the same time, I do wish just about every day that M-B had offered the 350 engine mated to a manual transmission. WTF M-B... That's the reason why I'll never (I think?) go AMG. What good is massive power without a stick?
Last edited by narky; Jun 14, 2008 at 03:39 AM.
What are the major differences between the 300 spt and 350 besides the engine?
If I get the 300 I would get the P1, Pano roof, MM, IPOD and AMG 18's.
Similar setup for the 350. I think the price difference is near $4k. Not sure if the better engine would be worth the $4k as I live in L.A. and open road is hard to come by.
These include the black Birdseye Maple trim with a no-cost with option to revert to faux aluminum trim, and the 7-speed auto + 2.82 axle setup.
I have ordered a 2009 C350 for European Delivery on 9/8/08 and noticed that the 7% discount, which is applied to the MSRP - BUT NOT OPTIONS, had the effect of reducing the price difference between a highly optioned EDP C300/AUTO/P2/Multi-Media and a comparable EDP C350/P2/Multi-Media down to about $2300. This seems to be a relative bargain compared with US pricing, especially as a C350 has a US resale advantage closer to $4000 than the EDP price difference between the two models.
I have driven both models and like the extra mid-range power of the C350; it can also handle the very, very nice auto without a performance hit. The C300 needs a bit more torque to overcome the initial torque converter loss.
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG

I didn't test-drive the 350, but I think in most (<- key word) real world situations, the power difference would have a negligible effect.
At the same time, I do wish just about every day that M-B had offered the 350 engine mated to a manual transmission. WTF M-B... That's the reason why I'll never (I think?) go AMG. What good is massive power without a stick?
Go with the C300 and go with the 6MT. It's a great transmission.
Last edited by skillz1318; Jun 14, 2008 at 08:48 AM.
2. I have ordered a 2009 C350 for European Delivery on 9/8/08 and noticed that the 7% discount, which is applied to the MSRP - BUT NOT OPTIONS, had the effect of reducing the price difference between a highly optioned EDP C300/AUTO/P2/Multi-Media and a comparable EDP C350/P2/Multi-Media down to about $2300. This seems to be a relative bargain compared with US pricing, especially as a C350 has a US resale advantage closer to $4000 than the EDP price difference between the two models.
3. I have driven both models and like the extra mid-range power of the C350; it can also handle the very, very nice auto without a performance hit. The C300 needs a bit more torque to overcome the initial torque converter loss.
Part 2, if your discount did not apply to the total MSRP of the car, including options, you were ripped off. The discount applies to the whole car as configuered.

I didn't test-drive the 350, but I think in most (<- key word) real world situations, the power difference would have a negligible effect.
At the same time, I do wish just about every day that M-B had offered the 350 engine mated to a manual transmission. WTF M-B... That's the reason why I'll never (I think?) go AMG. What good is massive power without a stick?
What good is a stick? The last true stick car MB made was the 2.3-16 and even that was only because they had to produce 5000 a year to qualify for the races. If you want an involved car, BMW is it. MBs are fast, but in no way uncomfortable. In fact, I'd say that an MB is one of the only cars that you can be sipping your coffee and still smoking most cars on the road. By the way, I come from a stick background and remember when the auto trannys sucked so bad, but these days they are way quicker than I am and can be programmed to drop gears at the perfect times.
The power between a 300 and a 350 is not small, especially in the real world where it is hard to keep trhe car in a good power spot. All you need to do is look at the TQ curve of the two and the gearing that you get with the 7 speed. Not a chance that you will be able to keep a steady RPM with a less powerful stick with less gears as you would with a more powerful engine with a 7 speed automatic tranny. It may not be as fun, but the performance is real.
The power between a 300 and a 350 is not small, especially in the real world where it is hard to keep trhe car in a good power spot. All you need to do is look at the TQ curve of the two and the gearing that you get with the 7 speed. Not a chance that you will be able to keep a steady RPM with a less powerful stick with less gears as you would with a more powerful engine with a 7 speed automatic tranny. It may not be as fun, but the performance is real.
I know that these days the computer can shift much, much faster than I can. And I know that the 350 engine + 7G has a far superior performance potential out of the box.
BUT, it's not as fun.
If I had to choose between having a manual trans and a bigger engine, I choose the manual.It's not even about performance (i.e. pure speed) for me, really. If I wanted that, I could've chosen to buy a few other fine cars for the same price. This car was chosen for its looks--something I never thought I'd do--yet I still couldn't give up the stick.
I dunno. Maybe I'm weird?I'm not dead set against automatics or anything. I'm just not ready for one yet.
If I had to choose between having a manual trans and a bigger engine, I choose the manual.It's not even about performance (i.e. pure speed) for me, really. If I wanted that, I could've chosen to buy a few other fine cars for the same price. This car was chosen for its looks--something I never thought I'd do--yet I still couldn't give up the stick.
I dunno. Maybe I'm weird?I'm not dead set against automatics or anything. I'm just not ready for one yet.
Nah, bro...you are an enthusiast. Nothing worng with that. I had a 4 cylinder M3, so i get it.
Part 2, if your discount did not apply to the total MSRP of the car, including options, you were ripped off. The discount applies to the whole car as configuered.
P.S. I just thought of another C350 difference; the standard 17" AMG 6 spoke AMG style wheels with all season tires (my preference, actually). I drove several models with the 18" wheel package and the ride was just a bit too hard/choppy on our local grained roads and potholes. Also, the C300 standard wheels are not very attractive (almost painted looking, actually).

I didn't test-drive the 350, but I think in most (<- key word) real world situations, the power difference would have a negligible effect.
At the same time, I do wish just about every day that M-B had offered the 350 engine mated to a manual transmission. WTF M-B... That's the reason why I'll never (I think?) go AMG. What good is massive power without a stick?
The front brakes are 1 inch bigger on the C350 Sport than on the C300 Sport. Brake size is similar for all C300 models, but perforated on the Sport.
I have by now read several reviews that strongly suggest the brakes on the C300 Luxury are not great resistance-wise.
I stated in a review I wrote last year that the C350 has substantially better performance. While I still agree with my initial impression, I had a chance to push a C300 with several thousand miles pretty hard on small, bad roads recently. In S mode, I was quite happy with it.
I just agree, you'd probably never regret the 350.
I regret to some degree the 300 over 350, but I don't sweat it much since I have a SLK350. If I only had the C, I'd want it in the 350 I think.
For me, though, the C350 was no contest.
As others mentioned, I also appreciate the bigger brakes, and the P1 being standard. Also: Does the C300 Sport have the tire offset? I can't remember.
Finally, somebody suggested Leather. Honestly, I say NO NO NO. I love my MB-Tex. I spend several hours a month cleaning the car as-is, having to worry about leather would be more work for no reward whatsoever beyond the smell of fresh leather.
MB-Tex stays far cooler in the summer (no leg scorching), and it'll look fantastic in when you trade the car in, even if you give it virtually zero attention from day 1 of ownership
As for C350 vs C300, sometimes I regret not paying the extra $7,000 (in Mexico). However more than the difference in engine size, the cause for lack of performance with either engine is the incompetent 7G transmission. Neither of the two setting "C" for "Catatonic" and "S" for "Snail" (hey, at least snails move...) provide an exciting experience. As my C300 has the Euro 2 package with the paddle shifters, there is also the "M" for "Maybe" setting. "Maybe" because even using the paddle shifters, by the time the 7G transmission makes up its mind that you actually asked it to shift, many, many seconds go by and I usually just shift back to the gear the tranny is already in, the overtake opportunity having passed long ago. Any comments, sports fans?







