Huge Mileage Difference Between 2008 and 2009 C Class
I noticed the main difference in the trip computer is when I press reset mileage "From Start", the 2009 resets at 25 MPG, while my 2008 resets at 21.5 MPG. This is on local road and on freeway. Freeway MPG ends up about the same after 10 minutes drive, averaging 29-30 MPG on both cars. However, local driving was big difference, with 2009 getting 22-24 MPG while my 2008 gets 18-20 MPG.
I don't understand how this could be, since both cars have the same engine, same weight, same transmission, and same EPA mileage estimate.
Can anyone verify if the 2009 trip computer always reset at 25 MPG, while the 2008 resets at 21.5 MPG and explain why the difference?
If a newer car gets better mileage with the same equipment and driver, then it's likely that you've trained your car, over time, to perform in a specific way. Try to reset the computer (procedure listed elsewhere, involving a 2 minute press of the accelerator, etc.) to see if that makes a difference.
If it doesn't, then maybe something is wonky in your car?
and still seeing 25 MPG everytime I reset the trip computer. I drive my own 2008 C300 very conservatively, so I would expect my 2008 to show better mileage numbers.What MPG are people seeing immediately after reset of the trip computer?
Even when I'm seeing my trip mileage climb through 30 mpg for the whole trip, if I reset the indicator, it will drop several mpg lower. Why? To me that smacks of bad programming, but what do I know? I do know that it will quite possibly not catch up to where it was before I finish my trip.
So: I rarely reset the trip mpg indicator while driving. Only for the whole trip. I find that more satisfying. When I hit 32 mpg, it just feels good!

At least for that particular 2009 C300, its trip computer has 25 MPG as default and it seems to have much better mileage than my 2008, which I drive very conservatively. I'm tempted to ask the dealer for a trade.
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG

Oh, I should have clarified, lower in litres per 100 km, higher in mpg.
also you'll avg better mpg if you don't have the optional 18" or aftermarket wheels. the stock touring tires have much less rolling resistance.
Turning on the car, after it had set for more than 5 hours yielded an mpg of __.__, followed within seconds by 21.5. Letting the car idle caused the numbers to visibly and quickly drop by about .2 mph in every second. Then hitting the reset got me 21.5 all over again.
So, I'm thinking that this is a programmer's heuristic. The basic assumption is that you start your car when you're not moving (0 mph), and you reset it when you're not moving. That means that the 21.5 is fairly close to the 19 mpg we are supposed to get in city driving (and 21.5 might be more accurate in Germany?). Why did they move it up to 25? Dunno, maybe more of the diesel cars, and 4-bangers are getting better mileage and the new 25 is designed to reflect how poor our 6-cyl cars do?
Turning on the car, after it had set for more than 5 hours yielded an mpg of __.__, followed within seconds by 21.5. Letting the car idle caused the numbers to visibly and quickly drop by about .2 mph in every second. Then hitting the reset got me 21.5 all over again.
So, I'm thinking that this is a programmer's heuristic. The basic assumption is that you start your car when you're not moving (0 mph), and you reset it when you're not moving. That means that the 21.5 is fairly close to the 19 mpg we are supposed to get in city driving (and 21.5 might be more accurate in Germany?). Why did they move it up to 25? Dunno, maybe more of the diesel cars, and 4-bangers are getting better mileage and the new 25 is designed to reflect how poor our 6-cyl cars do?







