Need opinions on a buy, c230 k vs c320
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
300zx twin turbo
Need opinions on a buy, c230 k vs c320
Looked at 2 Mercedes today, liked both, but they are a bit of different cars.
1. 2001 c320 white with only 22k miles on it for 13,500
2. 2005 c230 kompressor red, sport package, 38k miles 15, 990
Both cars are in immaculate shape as far as I can tell, and I test drove both. 230 def. felt a little sportier, but was a bit stiffer and louder (doesn't really bother me much)
I can afford either, but of course saving money is always good. Just looking for some positive/negatives of either and your opinions. I've never owned a Mercedes before, but looking for a nice daily driver, but still love my cars to be sporty. Atm I have a 91 300zx twin turbo with 475hp so I know what fast feels like![](http://mercedesforum.com/forum/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Personally I'm leaning toward the c230 because looks, year, mpg. The 320 is a lower cost, but mpg is a lil worse and I just don't like the look quite as much, though I don't dislike it by any means.
Any help is most appreciated!
1. 2001 c320 white with only 22k miles on it for 13,500
2. 2005 c230 kompressor red, sport package, 38k miles 15, 990
Both cars are in immaculate shape as far as I can tell, and I test drove both. 230 def. felt a little sportier, but was a bit stiffer and louder (doesn't really bother me much)
I can afford either, but of course saving money is always good. Just looking for some positive/negatives of either and your opinions. I've never owned a Mercedes before, but looking for a nice daily driver, but still love my cars to be sporty. Atm I have a 91 300zx twin turbo with 475hp so I know what fast feels like
![](http://mercedesforum.com/forum/images/smilies/smile.gif)
Personally I'm leaning toward the c230 because looks, year, mpg. The 320 is a lower cost, but mpg is a lil worse and I just don't like the look quite as much, though I don't dislike it by any means.
Any help is most appreciated!
#2
Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Netherlands, Haarlem
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
E200C-Fully loaded, Obsidian Black, ILS, Panoramic roof and some other bits and pieces.
I would go with the second one, 2001 and 22k miles sounds a bit suspicious ( 2750 miles / year ).
![EEK!](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/eek.gif)
#3
Super Moderator
![](https://staticssl.ibsrv.net/autocomm/Content/MB/mbwambassador2.gif)
Post this on the correct forum - W203
2001 was a bad year for W203s - Benz was still ironing out problems on the first computer simulated endurance testing car - don't touch it.
That said - V6s are a lot more durable than IL4s - It's mainly electronic hassles you can expect from a 2001.
2001 was a bad year for W203s - Benz was still ironing out problems on the first computer simulated endurance testing car - don't touch it.
That said - V6s are a lot more durable than IL4s - It's mainly electronic hassles you can expect from a 2001.
Last edited by Glyn M Ruck; 04-05-2009 at 10:25 AM. Reason: typo
#5
Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
300zx twin turbo