C-Class (W204) 2008 - 2014: C180K, C200K, C230, C280, C300, C350, C200CDI, C220CDI, C320CDI

Need opinions on a buy, c230 k vs c320

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 04-04-2009, 11:21 PM
  #1  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
surf1punk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
300zx twin turbo
Need opinions on a buy, c230 k vs c320

Looked at 2 Mercedes today, liked both, but they are a bit of different cars.

1. 2001 c320 white with only 22k miles on it for 13,500
2. 2005 c230 kompressor red, sport package, 38k miles 15, 990

Both cars are in immaculate shape as far as I can tell, and I test drove both. 230 def. felt a little sportier, but was a bit stiffer and louder (doesn't really bother me much)

I can afford either, but of course saving money is always good. Just looking for some positive/negatives of either and your opinions. I've never owned a Mercedes before, but looking for a nice daily driver, but still love my cars to be sporty. Atm I have a 91 300zx twin turbo with 475hp so I know what fast feels like

Personally I'm leaning toward the c230 because looks, year, mpg. The 320 is a lower cost, but mpg is a lil worse and I just don't like the look quite as much, though I don't dislike it by any means.

Any help is most appreciated!
Old 04-05-2009, 10:07 AM
  #2  
Member
 
Xaniar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Netherlands, Haarlem
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
E200C-Fully loaded, Obsidian Black, ILS, Panoramic roof and some other bits and pieces.
I would go with the second one, 2001 and 22k miles sounds a bit suspicious ( 2750 miles / year ).
Old 04-05-2009, 10:24 AM
  #3  
Super Moderator

 
Glyn M Ruck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Llandudno, Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 19,941
Received 177 Likes on 144 Posts
late 2009 CLK 350 Coupe Elegance, '65 Jaguar S Type wires
Post this on the correct forum - W203

2001 was a bad year for W203s - Benz was still ironing out problems on the first computer simulated endurance testing car - don't touch it.

That said - V6s are a lot more durable than IL4s - It's mainly electronic hassles you can expect from a 2001.

Last edited by Glyn M Ruck; 04-05-2009 at 10:25 AM. Reason: typo
Old 04-05-2009, 10:33 AM
  #4  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
C300Kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2015 Carrara White Metallic Porsche Cayman
DEF the 05..the 01 is way overpriced..that's an 8 year old car!
Old 04-05-2009, 02:33 PM
  #5  
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
surf1punk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
300zx twin turbo
Originally Posted by Xaniar
I would go with the second one, 2001 and 22k miles sounds a bit suspicious ( 2750 miles / year ).
Well it's in FL and most likely was a car for Winter Residents, and only driven a few months a year.

But thanks for the advice so far, I think I like the '05 better as well.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Need opinions on a buy, c230 k vs c320



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:25 PM.