- Mercedes-Benz C-Class: How to Install Door Speakers
Step by step instructions for do-it-yourself repairs
Browse all: Interior Guides
W204 Aftermarket Rear Speaker Retrofit - HowTo
Is this what you are describing?
http://www.shopatron.com/products/pr...292.0.0.0?pp=8&
Do you know if this mod is applicable to the face-lifted model (s204 2011) with the same ease?
Does the Kappa 62.9i fits as perfectly?
Thx!
btw very interesting topic!
The rear speakers require the shallow-mount 6032si.
As far as I know, MB has not changed the speaker system in the 2012 update. The 2014 may be a completely different story. In any case it is recommended that those purchasing a 2012 get the HK Logic 7 system.
Last edited by MrBailey; Sep 26, 2011 at 04:33 PM.
Crutchfield's listing says these speakers will NOT fit in the C class. As for price, the Infinity Kappa 60.9's are available from Amazon for under $110 pounds the pair. Here is a link:
http://www.amazon.co.uk/INFINITY-KAP...072623&sr=8-10
As for the rear coaxial speakers, if the Infinity 6032si shallow-mounts are unavailable, these MAY just fit, however one should ask around before ordering:
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Infinity-652...7072950&sr=1-3
Amazon offers free postage to Spain if it is over their minimum. lucky you, living in Madrid!!! We stay at the Hotel Miguel Angel when we go, but flying into or out of Barajas Airport is a cruel odyssey in itself, besides having lost bags there many times.
Yes amazon has been a lifeline to me many times here. I completely agree, Barajas (Terminal 4 above all) can be a nightmare. I think their baggage delivery system is based on chaos theory. I know the Miguel Angel quite well actually, nice place. Madrid is like most cities in my opinion, wonderful to visit but frustrating at times to live in (although I'd choose it over London - my hometown- anyday). Acapulco must be wonderful. I have visited Mexico D.F. for business a couple of times but saw little more than the inside of taxis and hotels. Everyone in our company there goes to Acupulco for holidays it seems...
Again many thanks for your unending support on here Bill (not to mention fast responses!)
Last edited by MrBailey; Sep 27, 2011 at 02:09 PM.
I have 3 choices:
1) Upgrade front 6.5 and tweeter with H/K parts. Keep the front crossover (looks like no body in the forum had found it and changed it) and rear speakers (as it's hellish to replace). This is like what Vic Viper did.
2) Replace with Infinity Kappa component 60.9cs in front and co-ax 62.9i in rear just like Akadan did. I think he also use the stock crossovers.
3) Same like 2) but with Focal access speakers instead. They have great crossovers, so its shame not to use them.
Price: 1) and 2) $250 > 3) $350. Easy to install: 1) > 2) > 3). Sound quality upgrade: 3) > 2) > 1)?
Any suggestions?
Last edited by yualfred; Jun 29, 2012 at 11:36 AM.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
1).- the HK speakers are REALLY inefficient and require both high watts AND severe equalization, which the stock audio unit cannot possible drive above a whisper. The door woofers in particular are made to NOT reproduce below 100 Hz to prevent interference with the special subwoofer under the rear seat in the HK option. Result: no sound and NO low bass.
2).- The Infinity Kappas both include huge, professional crossovers (the stock MB speakers which a Hong Kong MB rep, where they are sourced, said they cost $1 for ALL of them, and just use a tiny NP cap as the crossover). Included are separate xovers for the 60.9cs and the 62.9 coaxial have an outboard cable-attached xover. Plus their high efficiency will output peaks of over 114 dB. Set the level switches to "0 dB", this is important.
3).- The Focal Access (I understand the best ones the 165 A3 are now discontinued) only have an efficiency of 90 dB/watt, meaning that the Infinity Kappas will be TWO TO FOUR TIMES LOUDER for the same watt input (3 to 6 dB). While a decent speaker,the Focals need more power the stock audio headunit cannot provide, its about 25 watts per channel x4, and the Focals are happiest with at least 50 to 100 watts per channel.
1) agree with your comment in theory, however, Mr Vic Viper was very happy with the HK upgrade. If I trust his judgement of sound quality, then these assumptions must be true: a. Though inefficient compared to stock, the HU still can pump more power to drive HK speakers. b. In logic 7 system, the HU block the low freq to the speaker, but in Audio 50 full range sound is sent to the front, the speaker itself can reproduce below 100hz better than stock, thus better sound.
2) So you recomm this to be the right choice?
3) Focal access is 92db, vs Kappa 95db, so about half of sound pressure. I did see other people drive it directly from HU and get very good sound. But agree there is risk here.
Last edited by yualfred; Jun 29, 2012 at 06:06 PM.
1).- Infinity is part of the HK group, as such each division retains their identity, local management and most of their R&D and manufacturing capabilities. That said, the HK system woofers in particular are of an entirely different pedigree than the Infinity woofers, more like the Focals actually. A poly cone with a butyl surround, medium-size magnet with a large voice-coil gap, all geared for higher power inputs and higher excursions due to the huge built-in equalization engineered as part of the HK amp/speaker interface.
The HK system tweeters (as I understand the HK system) are directly fed from the HK headunit because an electronic crossover provides an 18dB/octave slope as opposed to a 6 to 12/dB octave slope with conventional crossovers (chokes, caps and coils). One must wonder if a crossover is available from MB along with the HK speakers? As mentioned, the bass amp is fed via fiber optic in the HK system to reduce the possibility of voltage noise or fluxuations, which would cause high excursions of the small 5 1/2" subwoofers with possible damage to these and the amp itself.
Remembering the 25 watt limit per channel of the stock headunit, the intentional inefficiency of the HK system speakers plus the need of complicated equalization in order for these to obtain flat reproduction, IMO eliminates using the HK system speakers without their associated electronics (e.g. replacing the headamp also).
2).- The Infinity system has a long OEM car installation history, some vehicles I have owned came with the Infinity system and EMIT flat ribbon tweeters. Accurate they were, but a little too "airy" for my taste, like the B&O system offered in some Mercs, not nearly as good as the HK.
The current Infinity Kappa series has huge magnets, small voice coil gaps equating to high efficiency, and uses a novel woven woofer cone material that is 10 times stiffer than the poly (less cone flex and distortion). Given the stock headunit's low distortion but limited 25 wpc output, the 60.9's seem a perfect match for the front speakers, and the crossover is an audio engineer's dream.
HOWEVER THERE IS AN ERROR about the REAR speakers, you absolutely want the Infinity 6032si Shallow Mount speakers for the rear, the magnet structure of the others are just too deep. The axial tweeter can even be tilted upwards so passengers get better highs.
So the Infinity Kappa was my choice, and after having them installed for nearly 2 years and adding a small self-powered sub under the rear shelf, have no major complaints, Except for not having the HK system in the first place. Except for that.
BTY when you go to Amazon.com and search for "Harman Kardon Mercedes replacement speakers" guess what comes up?
3).- As for the Focal Access, the efficiency spec I read for the 165's was 90 db/1 watt, but that is not the issue. Even with a 92 dB spec, why settle for 3 dB less sound for "3 dB more money"?
As a parting comment, in high quality audio one has to be prepared to throw "brand recognition" out the window first, as there surely are some surprises. The last two home systems purchased, without any budget limitations, totaled under $1000 for BOTH systems, and one would be challenged to do critical listening and find a single sonic fault with either of them. I am sorry that brands are just SO important, one always identifies a beer playing against an insurance group in any sports final. So forget the brand names, and use God's gift to judge sound - your brain located between your two ears, ATTACHED TO THE HEART.
I have 3 choices:
1) Upgrade front 6.5 and tweeter with H/K parts. Keep the front crossover (looks like no body in the forum had found it and changed it) and rear speakers (as it's hellish to replace). This is like what Vic Viper did.
2) Replace with Infinity Kappa component 60.9cs in front and co-ax 62.9i in rear just like Akadan did. I think he also use the stock crossovers.
3) Same like 2) but with Focal access speakers instead. They have great crossovers, so its shame not to use them.
Price: 1) and 2) $250 > 3) $350. Easy to install: 1) > 2) > 3). Sound quality upgrade: 3) > 2) > 1)?
Any suggestions?
Last edited by Scat01; Jun 29, 2012 at 08:44 PM.
Last edited by yualfred; Jun 30, 2012 at 09:28 AM.
1).- Infinity is part of the HK group, as such each division retains their identity, local management and most of their R&D and manufacturing capabilities. That said, the HK system woofers in particular are of an entirely different pedigree than the Infinity woofers, more like the Focals actually. A poly cone with a butyl surround, medium-size magnet with a large voice-coil gap, all geared for higher power inputs and higher excursions due to the huge built-in equalization engineered as part of the HK amp/speaker interface.
The HK system tweeters (as I understand the HK system) are directly fed from the HK headunit because an electronic crossover provides an 18dB/octave slope as opposed to a 6 to 12/dB octave slope with conventional crossovers (chokes, caps and coils). One must wonder if a crossover is available from MB along with the HK speakers? As mentioned, the bass amp is fed via fiber optic in the HK system to reduce the possibility of voltage noise or fluxuations, which would cause high excursions of the small 5 1/2" subwoofers with possible damage to these and the amp itself.
Remembering the 25 watt limit per channel of the stock headunit, the intentional inefficiency of the HK system speakers plus the need of complicated equalization in order for these to obtain flat reproduction, IMO eliminates using the HK system speakers without their associated electronics (e.g. replacing the headamp also).
2).- The Infinity system has a long OEM car installation history, some vehicles I have owned came with the Infinity system and EMIT flat ribbon tweeters. Accurate they were, but a little too "airy" for my taste, like the B&O system offered in some Mercs, not nearly as good as the HK.
The current Infinity Kappa series has huge magnets, small voice coil gaps equating to high efficiency, and uses a novel woven woofer cone material that is 10 times stiffer than the poly (less cone flex and distortion). Given the stock headunit's low distortion but limited 25 wpc output, the 60.9's seem a perfect match for the front speakers, and the crossover is an audio engineer's dream.
HOWEVER THERE IS AN ERROR about the REAR speakers, you absolutely want the Infinity 6032si Shallow Mount speakers for the rear, the magnet structure of the others are just too deep. The axial tweeter can even be tilted upwards so passengers get better highs.
So the Infinity Kappa was my choice, and after having them installed for nearly 2 years and adding a small self-powered sub under the rear shelf, have no major complaints, Except for not having the HK system in the first place. Except for that.
BTY when you go to Amazon.com and search for "Harman Kardon Mercedes replacement speakers" guess what comes up?
http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_no...ement+speakers
3).- As for the Focal Access, the efficiency spec I read for the 165's was 90 db/1 watt, but that is not the issue. Even with a 92 dB spec, why settle for 3 dB less sound for "3 dB more money"?
As a parting comment, in high quality audio one has to be prepared to throw "brand recognition" out the window first, as there surely are some surprises. The last two home systems purchased, without any budget limitations, totaled under $1000 for BOTH systems, and one would be challenged to do critical listening and find a single sonic fault with either of them. I am sorry that brands are just SO important, one always identifies a beer playing against an insurance group in any sports final. So forget the brand names, and use God's gift to judge sound - your brain located between your two ears, ATTACHED TO THE HEART.
1) I agree with your theory 100%, but somehow it didn't explain other member's result. This is from someone after he replaced the stock with HK speakers but feed from stock HU: 'And the difference in sound is really significant, I didn't think I would hear an improvement this big, the increase in bass is the primary improvement, and the overall sound is a lot fuller, especially in combination with the h/k tweeters.'.
Life had told us always keep an open mind. As you said, listen and trust your ears, I was hoping someone actually hear both the HK and Kappa from stock HU can compare.
2) Don't quite understand why the matching rear is not 62.9i but 6032si, which is not even Kappa.
3) Sometimes quality is more important than quantity. I'm not saying Focal access is better than Kappa, or the other way. As I don't have access to these speakers side by side, thus open for other people's comment. I would like to have comment from listening rather than spec comparison, which you know in audiophile world, doesn't usually mean a lot.
In the end, I agree with your recommendation of Kappa, I just auditioned it a few hours ago, it sounded excellent. Though I didn't have either HK nor Focal in comparison. My motive for HK replacement was really due to its easiness to install. But again, I agree the result is questionable.
Interesting to hear you got two $1000 home systems. Not that you can't get a good system with $1000, but you had 'limitless budget'. Depends on what your need is and when diminishing marginal benefit starts to click in, $1000 is still an unusually low number. But again, its what suites you the best. Ok, it's a totally different topic now....
Last edited by yualfred; Jun 30, 2012 at 09:29 AM.
The 6032si shallow mounts are the correct speakers for the rear, the 62.9's woofer basket are just too deep to fit. The efficiency and sound are the same. Save yourself a hassle.
As a symphony orchestra conductor and also having owned a pro sound company and custom loudspeaker manufacturing business, the "home system" in the 1970's cost about $50k. With computerized speaker profiling of the 1980's combined with vastly improved transistor amplifier topologies, one could have "more for less". Today, with millions of foreclosed homes and most major symphony orchestras in bankruptcy, there is hardly any "stereophile audio", and the most popular systems are hooked-up to watch NetFlix or cater to the "boom and tizz" brigade.
Since you asked, to get an orientation on what quality sound can be, take your iPod Classic with your favorite tunes loaded in Apple Lossless (What? Only MP3's? Shame on you!) to find a B&W Zeppelin Air. Just stick in the iPod, stand about 3 feet in front with the Zeppelin at ear level and crank it up. Really. About $600. The other audio surprise can be found occasionally on eBay, the Xbox Spherex 5.1 surround system. It has five 360 degree pods and a subwoofer, 480 distortionless watts from six separate amplifiers and a remote which controls everything. About $300 new in the box if you can find them. Bought 4 systems just to have them around, although my children have stolen all but one. Compared to my audiophile reference system, the bass is a bit too fat, losing dynamic transients on tympani for example (not dry enough), but above 100 Hz, I have no preference. MAYBE a soprano has less breathiness. In any case my reference system has fallen into disuse, it is last century technology, and don't even ask what it originally cost.
TWO TIPS: After the Infinity's are installed, PLEASE do NOT crank them up right away, as around 20 hours of moderate volume playing will be needed to break-in the woofer surrounds and HF drivers. After that, crank 'em up, its amazing what 25 watts can do with high efficiency drivers. the other TIP is to re-rip your original CD collection in Apple Lossless, as MP3's can be 1/10th the size because the encoding throws away 90% of the bits. Why throw 90% of the sound away? Buy an iPod Classic which has an excellent analog output section (the MB headunit turns this signal into digital and then back to analog again, quite transparently) and use ONLY Apple Lossless. Even on the stock MB system, the difference in quality is quite noticeable, especially in the bass. And buy only Apple Lossless format on iTunes, it costs the same, and one can always convert it into the best quality MP3 if needed (like for an iPod Shuffle).
I need somw help though.
I have a 2011 - C300 Sport - unfortunately WITHOUT the HK upgrade. I have the Audio 20. I see that for the last 2yrs most threads on this are still recommending Kappa 60.9 for the front and either the 62.9 or the 6032si for the rear.
I'd like to simply improve sound without any modifaction that will alter the main console and controls/knobs.
1) Are the Infinnity still the best speakers for this? Are there any new/better speaker options tha fit in easily as the infinity's?
2) I understand several people have installed the 62.9 in the REAR without major issues, even though, crutchfieled and other folks say they don't fit. Apparently there's just a bit more involved in the install. Can someone tell me the acoustical difference between the 62.9 and the 6032? Leaving price aside, which speaker is better for the REAR?
3) Has anyone added an AMP and kept the Main Console functions and knobs/controls?
4) For those of you that added a subwoofer. Please share the best location and install tips that keeep distortion/rattling to a minimum.
https://mbworld.org/forums/c-class-w...-new-post.html
In layman terms, say I would like to upgrade my speakers on a non HK Logic 2010 C class, what would I need for both front and back? Easy plug and play with nothing else to do but install the speaker without cutting nor drilling.
Sorry for asking, but when I see cross-overs, tweeters..... I'm getting afraid
So replacing all 4 is recommended, although if you wish, its OK just to replace the front.
Please remember to leave the crossover switch on 0 dB, and NOT -6 dB, to obtain best performance (the rear coaxials also have a switch that needs to be set to 0 dB). Best of luck and great listening after 30 hours of breakin.
What front model would you suggest, again, a simple plug and play? Same for the rear, plug and play or with minimal change.
Thx for helping
Last edited by pmpalma; Nov 2, 2012 at 06:08 PM.








