BAD NEWS FOR W204 FLOOD EASY


Also the engine otherwise should be the same as on other MB models, I assume also the air cleaner boxes are the same? There should be some area that traps most of the water instead of directing it to the intake but I thought that was the case with a 204 too.
Did they confirm that water had entered cylinders and made a water lock, which is bad? Or was it just some other sensitivity for water, like a sensor or something?




Yes I have read and seen a photograph of a pensioner in SA flooding and ruining his new C350. I also remember he experiened problems with his Motorplan & Insurance regarding this, don't know what the outcome was.
He driven through a deepish pool not so visible in depth.
Maybe the front fender act as a pickup of water due to its shape.
I am sure an easy mod is possible.
Last edited by Moto_Guzzi; Jan 15, 2010 at 02:40 AM.
Also the engine otherwise should be the same as on other MB models, I assume also the air cleaner boxes are the same? There should be some area that traps most of the water instead of directing it to the intake but I thought that was the case with a 204 too.
Did they confirm that water had entered cylinders and made a water lock, which is bad? Or was it just some other sensitivity for water, like a sensor or something?
Trending Topics
With that said, conceivably a small, but very strategically placed splash of water may be funneled down the intake track(s) and cause the issue. I did notice that there is not any type of drain device on the intake runners. Once the water gets in, there is really no place for it to go...except up and through the filter into the engine. Maybe Benz should install a simple flap on the bottom of each banks intake runner that would be pushed down by the weight of water to allow for its release?
The Best of Mercedes & AMG

We need a comments from MERCEDES BENZ ASAP. A recall to fixed this problem should be happen SOOOON.
We need a comments from MERCEDES BENZ ASAP. A recall to fixed this problem should be happen SOOOON.some people have closed/filled the small holes in the air boxes to compose even more of a ram intake. those cars should then experience this problem under even heavy rain conditions, no? i'm pretty sure the high flow carbino air boxes in the 63's don't have any holes what so ever...and I don't think the eurospec boxes in any 204's have holes for drainage.
in the winter, when visiting the touchless carwash, i've revved the engine up to around 2500k as to draw in air as the hoses are blasting water at very high pressures, virtually into the intakes at level angles to see if it caused any bogging...negative.

It's a mercedes but hey!, it's still a car!
Anyways don't tell anything to Mercedes Benz AG... (the factory) they probably can fit higher springs on sport models in the near future and that's NOT a good idea! Lol!

Yes, there may be a problem. Yes, the problem may be compounded by mods to basic designs. But... the driver has to know his limitations and learn to solve these problems before they become catastrophic.



If you prefer to drive a Mercedes over a Land Rover in these conditions, I suggest you a Unimog.
Last edited by JoeVal; Jan 15, 2010 at 02:29 PM.
are you responding to me? If so, i was saying yes, WITH the touchless carwash it was firing HOT water straight into the intakes. I was holding the revs at around 2500k to simulate 6th gear/75mph cruising. there was no indication what so ever that any water was getting anywhere near the TB.
as far as the undercarriage getting wet...whats the difference? there are no inlets to the intake from under the car. as long as the car can breath you can practically drive it underwater....meaning if air can get into the intake and out through the exhaust, the engine should run.

For once JoeVal & I agree. If you want to drive a vehicle in these conditions buy a UNIMOG with a snorkle. Even a Landrover will hydralock in these conditions without the optional snorkle fitted.
No sensible person drives a car with water at hood or bonnet level. The transmission & diff likely have ingested water through their breathers. These cars don't have sealed bellhousings either like a Landrover does.
Crazy
Last edited by Glyn M Ruck; Jan 16, 2010 at 12:40 AM.
Though I can see how water splashing onto your car from trucks can be a problem. It's thing of wrong place, wrong time I suppose. Though I'm sure in any other car in the same situation, you would have the same problem as well.
as far as the undercarriage getting wet...whats the difference? there are no inlets to the intake from under the car. as long as the car can breath you can practically drive it underwater....meaning if air can get into the intake and out through the exhaust, the engine should run.
Yes, there may be a problem. Yes, the problem may be compounded by mods to basic designs. But... the driver has to know his limitations and learn to solve these problems before they become catastrophic.



If you prefer to drive a Mercedes over a Land Rover in these conditions, I suggest you a Unimog.
As he said!.... I have a Mercedes in PR and i have never had a single problem with it due to this...
Common sense to me is that if it's in a height over the foglight I WON'T TRY and PaSS it!.... let alone Intake HIGH!
.... it's just Crazy
For once JoeVal & I agree. If you want to drive a vehicle in these conditions buy a UNIMOG with a snorkle. Even a Landrover will hydralock in these conditions without the optional snorkle fitted.
No sensible person drives a car with water at hood or bonnet level. The transmission & diff likely have ingested water through their breathers. These cars don't have sealed bellhousings either like a Landrover does.
Crazy

Amen!, as he said! 

