New Ride Possibly
Micropower..excellent choice. Still would've gone with the S5 but im guessing you need the 4 doors for practical reasons.
Like I said before I despise Lexus and the 3 series is as bland as a Civic, so I think you made the right choice.
Micropower..excellent choice. Still would've gone with the S5 but im guessing you need the 4 doors for practical reasons.
Like I said before I despise Lexus and the 3 series is as bland as a Civic, so I think you made the right choice.

Last edited by BerBer63; Jul 17, 2010 at 06:18 PM.
i'm not quite understanding what you are saying. even phil/nlpamg who has an M5 was impressed with the IS-F performance, but he said he like the C63 more only for the fact that it sounds insane. IS-F right now is pretty cheap btw last I checked they were around $54k OTD it's around the same price as the S4.
Last edited by FrankW; Jul 17, 2010 at 07:56 PM.
Last edited by BerBer63; Jul 17, 2010 at 08:15 PM.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
the service difference between dealership is negligible since there are always bad dealerships out there just depends on where you go. I've been treated badly by all three at different locations.
I just don't think they're overpriced since for MB, BMW, Audi, the coupe version of something has always demanded a higher price. for comparison, E550 coupe is about the same price as the S5 and that is really the real comparison for the S5. I really don't think people that are considering about the S5 would care to shop the C63 vise versa, unless you did it. I'd only look at C63/M3/ISF/CTS-V if it's me. If i'm considering a coupe then it would be between S5 and the e92 M3 for a performance coupe that is. lol
too bad the RS5 is not available in the US otherwise it would've give the C63/M3/ISF a run for the money.
http://www.jdpower.com/autos/ratings...remium-vehicle
http://www.jdpower.com/autos/ratings...ry-premium-car
Last edited by Sportstick; Jul 18, 2010 at 04:14 PM.
as far as the "sub par performance in it's category"...like i've said before...Audi didn't market it as a C63/M3 competitor but rather a CLK550/E550 and some what a e92 335 competitor.
This sticker price is marked at like $76k but when I walked into the dealership for the first time, they offered to order one from the factory for $54k, so the markdown is impressive.
Apparently, there's been a dramatic shift in pricing between the '09 and '11 model. The XJ Supersport, which has the 510 hp engine I was looking at, is base priced at $110k. I wonder if there's still such insane price flexibility or if they've adjusted their production and tightened their inventory. The nice thing about the jag was that there's no need to put in a bunch of options, it's base model has pretty much everything you need.
Last edited by Peabody; Jul 18, 2010 at 08:21 PM.
http://www.jdpower.com/autos/ratings...remium-vehicle
http://www.jdpower.com/autos/ratings...ry-premium-car
This sticker price is marked at like $76k but when I walked into the dealership for the first time, they offered to order one from the factory for $54k, so the markdown is impressive.
Apparently, there's been a dramatic shift in pricing between the '09 and '11 model. The XJ Supersport, which has the 510 hp engine I was looking at, is base priced at $110k. I wonder if there's still such insane price flexibility or if they've adjusted their production and tightened their inventory. The nice thing about the jag was that there's no need to put in a bunch of options, it's base model has pretty much everything you need.
An Audi purchase could be based on the personal importance of TGR (Things Gone Right) being more important than TGW (Things Gone Wrong). These are metrics which assess how delighted one may be with a car, versus actual quality failures. If you are sufficiently delighted with a car, history shows you will be more willing to put up with its problems. For others, where the importance of avoiding TGW is more important than TGR, some in the extreme just buy Toyotas. For most of us, there is a balance we each need to find. We just should have the best info available to make that choice.
for example, one mechanical inclined and the other is not. both owns the same car. the former would most likely put off a few things that he knows how it works and how it broke or not working as it should until he can get it to a dealership. however for the not so inclined he would complaint about it until dealership fixes it. the inclined guy would probably say the car is great except few minor thing that's not that big of a deal, but the not so inclined guy he would probably say the car is a POS that has issues. AND those that are taking these surveys 90% of the time are those that are not.
For example, I can't imagine sitting in this car and not throwing up. I don't care if it's all made from white gold and baby seal hides, it's simultaneously hideous, oppressive, and boring.
Response bias is distributed across segments, and within segments with similar psychographic profiles, would especially be a "wash". Quota sampling ensures a proper distribution in the respondent population.
A lot of this conversation is evolving into what constitutes "crap". The answer varies widely among different groups of people. The first issue is "does it work", and the second is "do I like it" which includes all those intangibles of how does it feel? Only you can decide how to balance the importance of those two. No surprises that "do I like it", or as I wrote above, TGR, is supremely important on an enthusiast forum. As Peabody indicates, no amount of perfection would let him sit in the car he showed as an example. That might make that car subjectively "crap" to him. So, how much Audi-love is going on to offset the demonstrably higher likelihood of visiting the service department?
And Peabody that's not the current MKZ interior, that's an old pic. Still, I agree the car sucks.
Thanks again guys!
For example, I can't imagine sitting in this car and not throwing up. I don't care if it's all made from white gold and baby seal hides, it's simultaneously hideous, oppressive, and boring.






