Gas Alternatives
I'm sure everyone is feeling the pinch of gas prices here recently. I've seen quite a few car manufacturers come out with hybrid vehicles, but not much from the MB folks. I don't know about you all but I'm paying close to $65 bucks in the Northern Va area to fill my 350. I know I know I know...if you can afford the car, you can afford the gas, but not my point. I'm taking the Chevy Volt, as merely an example, which costs about what I paid for my 350 seems to be a nice car. Has anyone heard of Benz is going to do anything similar? The Leaf is small, cute and probably not what I'd be looking for, but none the less, it is out there as are many more. I think there is going to be a market for these cars, and I hope Benz doesn't loose out. I love my car and I get excited every time I drive it, but the excitement is getting costly.
As for saving $, the upcoming C250 CDI uses a 1.8 L twin turbo providing the same acceleration as the C300, 22% more torque, and HALF the fuel consumption.
The Chevy Volt is certainly starting a trend. Many friends in the San Diego area have sold their gas-guzzling BMWs (relatively, because they are 20% more fuel efficient than the MB), and bought Volts, tiny Hyundai's, Honda Fits & Insights, and Fusion Hybrids because it saves them $8,000 a year. And they could well afford their BMWs with incomes over $120k, guess they figured that there were better things to do with their $ and ecology consciousness.
http://www.emercedesbenz.com/autos/m...ation-c-class/
Trending Topics
http://www.emercedesbenz.com/autos/m...ation-c-class/
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
http://www.topgear.com/uk/photos/mercedes-electric-SLS
As for saving $, the upcoming C250 CDI uses a 1.8 L twin turbo providing the same acceleration as the C300, 22% more torque, and HALF the fuel consumption.
Actually the C250 is a 2.2 (204PS) and can achieve 4.0L/100km.
And continuing with the numbers, the new C 350CDI has more torque (265PS & 620nm @ 1600rpm) than the C-63 with 600nm @ 6500rpm.
These numbers are quotes from my new copy of Auto motor und Sport from Stuttgart where they test all the 2012 C-Classes.
There were a couple of criticisms of the C250 and C350 CDIs, one of which was light engine vibration.
And they don't mention a C300 gasser making me wonder if it's gone.
Last edited by RLE; Apr 22, 2011 at 11:11 PM.
And while many manufacturers will go the rechargeable battery with internal combustion backup route, MB will continue for the moment to provide higher efficiency internal combustion motors (its their 125 year heritage I guess) before seriously concentrating on the E-cell technology demonstrated with the one-off SLS.
About the 350 CDI - (currently available in the E class) some calculate there is no economic savings here, as the cost to recharge the urea-based exhaust additive is around $1,000 dls every 100k miles, practically offsetting the mileage saving, for the US anyway, as diesel commonly cost more than gasoline. Owners will literally "**** away" their savings.



http://www.bmwactivatethefuture.com/
Although the upcoming Ford Focus RS500, with its 4-cyl 2.0L engine, produces the same HP as the current 4.4L 8-cylinder BMW M3 engine (414 HP) AND MORE TORQUE. Much is contributed by (wait for it) natural aspiration before using forced induction.
Combined with energy recuperation (hybrid), the future promises cleaner, more efficient and more powerful automobiles. I can't wait.
Although the upcoming Ford Focus RS500, with its 4-cyl 2.0L engine, produces the same HP as the current 4.4L 8-cylinder BMW M3 engine (414 HP) AND MORE TORQUE. Much is contributed by (wait for it) natural aspiration before using forced induction.
Combined with energy recuperation (hybrid), the future promises cleaner, more efficient and more powerful automobiles. I can't wait.
Alternative? Burn more air and less fuel, and do it better.
Laser Sparks Revolution in Internal Combustion Engine
To try and detonate the mixture all at once would cause pinging and knocking. Which high octane gasolines try to avoid by burning more slowly and predictably.
So I dont get it. Platinum tipped plugs can get up to 100k miles, and the technology is really SO simple. They almost never fail (one in tens of millions). This laser idea I think is
incorrect.
Although spark plugs do eventually fail and possibly are not as efficient as the lasers would be, I think the laser technology faces a lot of issues.
1) The ceramics and optics producing the laser would get dirty reducing the power of the laser over time
2) Have more possibility of failure than a modern spark plug
3) The cost would probably be much higher.
So I think this technology will never catch on. Before that happens we will probably be using alternative methods of energy.
Like the bicycle?





