c300 2011 or 2012?
The big question is should I get the 2012 or 2011? I love all the changes they're doing to the 2012 EXCEPT everything EXTERIOR. Thats right, the new front looks like a cheap 3 series sedan copy with the head lights and the buck tooth bumper. If anything is it possible to do a front end conversion?
The chasis should still be the same if I'm not mistaken which means getting a OEM front bumper and hood (possibly fenders?) and doing a conversion shouldn't be too hard.
2011 / 2012 / 2012 (2011) conversion?
btw does anyone know how much faster (or slower) the 2012 will be? I use to have a w203 320 and it felt so much faster than a rental c300 my dad took out when his clk was being fixed.
Last edited by bringtherain; May 28, 2011 at 08:23 AM.
The 2012 C250 is already here in Mexico. So is the 2012 C350 CGI which has 38 more HP, 20 NM more torque and about 20% better MPG. Does a flat 6.0 in 0 to 60 MPH.
I agree strongly with the exterior looks issue. In fact, the 2008-2010 W204 looks better than the 2011, as the whole LED thing is a childish attempt to slap on some Audi as a "refresh". And then BMW cats eyes in 2012? When all the other Mercedes models such as the CLS, SLK, SL and fabulous new A, are trailblazing the most fantastic and amazing new styling trends in the auto industry. PERIOD. (See the official MB "A" site, just posted yesterday, in Mexico of all places, on this W204 forum).
The "best buy" here would be a CPO 2010 or 2011 C350 in terms of performance, if you are unwilling to spring for a new 2012 C350 CGI (despite the horrid appearance, the interior is certainly upscale). Plus the substantial performance increase and gas savings from the CGI. And the new C350 CGI will be worth much more in 5 years than a new C300.
So forget a NEW C300. If the C300 performance is satisfactory (and let's fact it, it isn't), then go for the beauty of a 2010. The 2011 C300 is already obsolete, why bother?
The 2012 C250 is already here in Mexico. So is the 2012 C350 CGI which has 38 more HP, 20 NM more torque and about 20% better MPG. Does a flat 6.0 in 0 to 60 MPH.
I agree strongly with the exterior looks issue. In fact, the 2008-2010 W204 looks better than the 2011, as the whole LED thing is a childish attempt to slap on some Audi as a "refresh". And then BMW cats eyes in 2012? When all the other Mercedes models such as the CLS, SLK, SL and fabulous new A, are trailblazing the most fantastic and amazing new styling trends in the auto industry. PERIOD. (See the official MB "A" site, just posted yesterday, in Mexico of all places, on this W204 forum).
The "best buy" here would be a CPO 2010 or 2011 C350 in terms of performance, if you are unwilling to spring for a new 2012 C350 CGI (despite the horrid appearance, the interior is certainly upscale). Plus the substantial performance increase and gas savings from the CGI. And the new C350 CGI will be worth much more in 5 years than a new C300.
So forget a NEW C300. If the C300 performance is satisfactory (and let's fact it, it isn't), then go for the beauty of a 2010. The 2011 C300 is already obsolete, why bother?
If you are set to purchase a W204 new, then spend the extra scratch and go for a 2011 C350, and make sure you get the Harman Kardon stereo option. At 1.99% APR, on 60-month financing, the few dollars extra for the C350 will be worth every penny, and the C350 resale value will be substantially higher than a C300, in view that the C300 is "pre-obsolete".
In Mexico we have 0% interest financing for 24 months.
As for the W204 2012, only the interior will be carried over on the new C-class 2013/2014 rollout, frankly the European previews leaked to the German press are just ugly, MB is trying to go for the new visceral look of the CLS, SLK and the A, but fail to get the balance right and the rear end is indistinguishable from the current Audi A4/VW Jetta. Check out the photo.
The 2008-2011 W204 is destined to become a classic, much in the way that the 300 SL and 280 SL are, just because of their beauty and balance, reliability and manufacturing quality. The 2012 model is just "passing through" on its way to the 2013/14 complete makeover.
If you are set to purchase a W204 new, then spend the extra scratch and go for a 2011 C350, and make sure you get the Harman Kardon stereo option. At 1.99% APR, on 60-month financing, the few dollars extra for the C350 will be worth every penny, and the C350 resale value will be substantially higher than a C300, in view that the C300 is "pre-obsolete".
In Mexico we have 0% interest financing for 24 months.
As for the W204 2012, only the interior will be carried over on the new C-class 2013/2014 rollout, frankly the European previews leaked to the German press are just ugly, MB is trying to go for the new visceral look of the CLS, SLK and the A, but fail to get the balance right and the rear end is indistinguishable from the current Audi A4/VW Jetta. Check out the photo.
The 2008-2011 W204 is destined to become a classic, much in the way that the 300 SL and 280 SL are, just because of their beauty and balance, reliability and manufacturing quality. The 2012 model is just "passing through" on its way to the 2013/14 complete makeover.
Whats a good price for a multimedia package 350 2011? 45k is definitely out of range. I originally went from 20 spending limit to 25 to 30 n now 35. Would 38 otd possible? N what's everyones take on pan roofs? Also there was a dealer with a barolo red 350 with media package, 27900 sticker at 30k miles. The only thing I have against it is color. I planned on getting the carlsson SPORT lip with supersport hr springs and in white its a beauty. In dark red... I just don't know. Should I skip getting a new 11 n ****** a 09 350 with media?
Sorry for all the short hand. On lunch break using my phone
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
Also, I believe the performance gains from the C300 to C350 are very minimal (something like 0.4 seconds or something) so unless you must have the C350, C300W4M are the popular option where I am locally.
Also, I believe the performance gains from the C300 to C350 are very minimal (something like 0.4 seconds or something) so unless you must have the C350, C300W4M are the popular option where I am locally.
He meant mexico ALREADY has them on lot. The difference from 300 and 350 is 1.1 second com 0 to 60
Also, I believe the performance gains from the C300 to C350 are very minimal (something like 0.4 seconds or something) so unless you must have the C350, C300W4M are the popular option where I am locally.
You can still order C350W4M and C250W4M as well for Canada. Only the 350s and 250 RWD are getting the new engine/powertrain though.
I just joined MB Canada, lots to learn still :p
Last edited by Kamen; May 30, 2011 at 02:05 PM.
Seems like the ergonomics of a C-Class would be better suited to an auto, in my opinion at least, I would see myself not being really comfortable shifting around. They probably ditched the idea because if you're looking for a fun car in stick, a new C-Class doesn't seem to fit the bill. The new refresh and features are pretty impressive to me in an entry level sedan.
As of now you can get stick in the current MY C classes and B classes, but there will be no new B next year as they are still working on it. I think stick shift cars are going to be really rare if any at all within the MB line moving forward.
Seems like the ergonomics of a C-Class would be better suited to an auto, in my opinion at least, I would see myself not being really comfortable shifting around. They probably ditched the idea because if you're looking for a fun car in stick, a new C-Class doesn't seem to fit the bill. The new refresh and features are pretty impressive to me in an entry level sedan.
As of now you can get stick in the current MY C classes and B classes, but there will be no new B next year as they are still working on it. I think stick shift cars are going to be really rare if any at all within the MB line moving forward.
Last edited by Sportstick; May 30, 2011 at 03:29 PM.
Have never really liked them and although the stance of some of their newer vehicles looks nice, I have never wanted one and they would be my last choice. IMO the real difference is just between MB and BMW. I am not sure about other parts of the world but locally, Audi doesn't even stand a chance in terms of sales volume.
I would have to especially agree with the ride in comment; as you know what people say, you drive a BMW, you ride in a MB.
On a weekend you can give me a Lotus Elise for all I care but for a daily commute, I've learned to appreciate the comforts something like an E-Class provides after pulling a 9-8pm shift haha







