NHTSA Crash Tests on 2012 Model
#26
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chevy Chase, MD
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2012 E350 4Matic
#27
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Germantown, MD/Rehoboth Beach, DE
Posts: 1,351
Received 88 Likes
on
60 Posts
2024 GLS450
Size is going to win out in any case. Your average S550 has 1,000LB on a RWD C, and your average S600 has 1,500LB on that same C. I don't think the difference would be that dramatic, but the C is going to be worse for wear.
The other 2 components to the IIHS smear against small cars that was linked were the Fit versus the Accord, and the Yaris versus the Camry. They both did poor as well according to those tests, yet the weight ratios between the 2 cars in those crashes were significantly smaller than the smart versus C300.
I've owned a smart for 3.5 years and live right up the road from you. I live right by Euromotorcars' body shop, and I see from there on occasion how they perform in real world crashes. I've been rear ended twice in mine, the last time totaling a late model Taurus, and I'm still here and fine. Of the wrecked Cs I have seen there, they either appear to have held up really well or are obliterated - not a lot of middle ground but not something I would think you could blame on the car.
Point being - ratings and videos are only one part of the equation.
The other 2 components to the IIHS smear against small cars that was linked were the Fit versus the Accord, and the Yaris versus the Camry. They both did poor as well according to those tests, yet the weight ratios between the 2 cars in those crashes were significantly smaller than the smart versus C300.
I've owned a smart for 3.5 years and live right up the road from you. I live right by Euromotorcars' body shop, and I see from there on occasion how they perform in real world crashes. I've been rear ended twice in mine, the last time totaling a late model Taurus, and I'm still here and fine. Of the wrecked Cs I have seen there, they either appear to have held up really well or are obliterated - not a lot of middle ground but not something I would think you could blame on the car.
Point being - ratings and videos are only one part of the equation.
#28
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Dix Hills, New York
Posts: 2,108
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes
on
7 Posts
2012 C250 Coupe
^ Exactly, it seems most people have skipped over my post in all the action (probably because it was extremely lengthy and overbearing). But to sum it up, most of the ratings and tests simulate crashes with vehicles of similar (exact) size/weight. As such, in real-world, a c-class will fair better in crashes when compared to vehicles of smaller size (like the Ford Fiesta) who fared much better in the tests (getting 4 stars on front barrier versus c-class' 2 stars).
This isn't even mentioning the increased capabilities and manueverability you have in a c-class from more advanced braking, to better control at highway speeds. The list goes on and on. Extra features/options such as brake assist and blind spot, etc, are simply icing on the cake.
This isn't even mentioning the increased capabilities and manueverability you have in a c-class from more advanced braking, to better control at highway speeds. The list goes on and on. Extra features/options such as brake assist and blind spot, etc, are simply icing on the cake.
#30
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chevy Chase, MD
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2012 E350 4Matic
^ Exactly, it seems most people have skipped over my post in all the action (probably because it was extremely lengthy and overbearing). But to sum it up, most of the ratings and tests simulate crashes with vehicles of similar (exact) size/weight. As such, in real-world, a c-class will fair better in crashes when compared to vehicles of smaller size (like the Ford Fiesta) who fared much better in the tests (getting 4 stars on front barrier versus c-class' 2 stars).
This isn't even mentioning the increased capabilities and manueverability you have in a c-class from more advanced braking, to better control at highway speeds. The list goes on and on. Extra features/options such as brake assist and blind spot, etc, are simply icing on the cake.
This isn't even mentioning the increased capabilities and manueverability you have in a c-class from more advanced braking, to better control at highway speeds. The list goes on and on. Extra features/options such as brake assist and blind spot, etc, are simply icing on the cake.
#31
Super Moderator
I think that one has to embrace the concept that safety includes the prevention of an accident plus onboard systems and components that are not considered/evaluated in Euro NCAP & similar testing.
#32
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chevy Chase, MD
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2012 E350 4Matic
I agree completely and MB in my opinion is the winner there. At the same time some accidents can't be avoided and the crash testing is all we have to measure safety in those instances.
#33
Super Moderator
Agreed! - but if as an example you have intrusion into the passenger footwell that the testing chiefs consider poor due to a predetermined measure but the shin bags on a Benz save the passenger's legs then who is correct. Benz will say they are. The same can be said for Benz sticking to their guns that in a bad accident that door locks must ultimately be released for access.
#34
MBWorld Fanatic!
I've never been accused of being too brief either! That may be why this earlier comment seems to have been missed by some as well!
#35
MBWorld Fanatic!
The other 2 components to the IIHS smear against small cars that was linked were the Fit versus the Accord, and the Yaris versus the Camry. They both did poor as well according to those tests, yet the weight ratios between the 2 cars in those crashes were significantly smaller than the smart versus C300.
Last edited by Sportstick; 01-02-2012 at 09:05 AM.
#36
MBWorld Fanatic!
Actually, they pioneered several features now more widely in use, such as high boron steel for more a crush resistant roof, for one significant, but low awareness example.