C-Class (W204) 2008 - 2014: C180K, C200K, C230, C280, C300, C350, C200CDI, C220CDI, C320CDI

w204 spacers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Dec 20, 2012 | 11:47 PM
  #1  
zbysiu23's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
c300
w204 spacers

Hi
My wife has 2011 c300 sport 4matic with the AMG 18in wheels..
My questions:
-What would be the max spacer thickness for rear and the front???
-The front wheel hub has a semi spherical grease cover that extends beyond the hub lip?? will this restrict placement of hubcentric spacer??
-We have bought set of winter wheels and tires and those need spacers bad..
I have measured and came with 15mm for the rear and 12mm for the front to appear flush -er ,,,,
-the optimal solution would be to have set that I could use for both sets??
-first problem: bought set of 12 and 15mm on ebay for the model,,, the center holes dont even fit over the hubs... and the grease cover in front??

Has anyone have any experience with this particular car and spacers???
especially the front ones???

Thank you
Chris

Last edited by zbysiu23; Dec 21, 2012 at 12:31 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2012 | 07:01 PM
  #2  
Knightmare69's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 16
From: Hong Kong
2010 C200 CGI
I'm running H&R spacers and extended bolts on my car, 10mm front and 12mm rear. So my offset comes in at +35 front and +33 rear on 8.5 wide wheels. Get quality spacers or at least search the hub size you need to get so your eBay spacers will fit.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2012 | 08:26 PM
  #3  
zbysiu23's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
c300
Thank you,
Which wheels are you using?? standard ? or the AMG??
The 10mm front.. any issues fitting it over the grease cap??
Which 204 are you driving??
Do you still have the part nr. for the spacers???

I am pretty sure I have seen w204 with 12mm rear and 10mm front and it looked perfect..
However there was bunch of guys on forums going back from 10mm rear on AMG to 5mm
to look right???? so I am pretty confused...
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2012 | 11:46 PM
  #4  
Knightmare69's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 16
From: Hong Kong
2010 C200 CGI
I'm running vmr v710 wheels in 18x8.5 all around with 225/40/18 tires. No issues fitting the spacers over the center bores as these are Mercedes specific spacers. C200 cgi avantgarde trim. I dont have the part numbers on hand but just look it up on hr website.
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2012 | 07:11 PM
  #5  
Cleanbenz's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 455
Likes: 2
From: Lancaster, PA
2010 E350
The grease cap is smaller than the hub so your spacer will fit right over it no problem. On my factory wheels I was running 12mm front spacers and 20mm rear, zero issues. I'm also lowered on coils so my camber let me run a slightly wider track than stock.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2012 | 12:28 AM
  #6  
zbysiu23's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
c300
the part number for H&R 12mm spacer that I am finding is 2455665 ....
Has anyone put those on the front of w204??? or better yet c300 4matic sport???
:-)
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2012 | 08:20 AM
  #7  
Cleanbenz's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 455
Likes: 2
From: Lancaster, PA
2010 E350
Originally Posted by zbysiu23
the part number for H&R 12mm spacer that I am finding is 2455665 ....
Has anyone put those on the front of w204??? or better yet c300 4matic sport???
:-)
Yes, I have been running them on my front stock wheels for the past several months with 20mm in the rear as well. I have an extra set of 20mm h&r I'd sell also.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2012 | 02:02 PM
  #8  
andrew e coupe's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 781
Likes: 72
From: Ohio
2017 E400 Coupe & 2018 GLC43
~ i have a new set (one axle) of h&r 10mm trak spacers (hub centric) for sale.
Reply
MB World Stories

The Best of Mercedes & AMG

story-0

Six Gift Ideas Your AMG Loving Dad or Grad Will Cherish

 
story-1

7 Craziest Things AMG Gas Ever Built

 Verdad Gallardo
story-2

New Electric Mercedes-AMG GT 4-Door Coupe Unveiled: 10 Things You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun

 Verdad Gallardo
story-5

Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Dec 29, 2012 | 03:24 PM
  #9  
kevink2's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,331
Likes: 9
From: Delaware
2004 Mazda6, 1993 RX7
This is the oem wheel data for the 2008 W204:

Wheel Size and Offsets, 2008

Just look at the position of the oem outer side of the specified tire, relative to the hub face. As I understand it, front and rear hub face spacing is the same.

So if I look at the offset to the outer tire face, from the hub face, I get:


65.5mm, F & R, ... oem Lux model, no stagger.

62.5mm F, 73.5mm R, staggered 18" option.

72.5mm F, 73.3mm R, C63 18's.


For these 3 cases, the front outer tire surface equaled the rear, except for the staggered 18" option, where the fronts have 11 mm less "lateral projection" vs the rears.

I focused on the position of the outer face of the tires, because that is what the eye sees.

.
Reply
Old Dec 29, 2012 | 04:13 PM
  #10  
Cleanbenz's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 455
Likes: 2
From: Lancaster, PA
2010 E350
Originally Posted by kevink2
This is the oem wheel data for the 2008 W204:

Wheel Size and Offsets, 2008

Just look at the position of the oem outer side of the specified tire, relative to the hub face. As I understand it, front and rear hub face spacing is the same.

So if I look at the offset to the outer tire face, from the hub face, I get:


65.5mm, F & R, ... oem Lux model, no stagger.

62.5mm F, 73.5mm R, staggered 18" option.

72.5mm F, 73.3mm R, C63 18's.


For these 3 cases, the front outer tire surface equaled the rear, except for the staggered 18" option, where the fronts have 11 mm less "lateral projection" vs the rears.

I focused on the position of the outer face of the tires, because that is what the eye sees.

.
Um... You aren't taking into account that the axles are different widths. Front track is wider than rear. Offsets of wheels matching means nothing. I promise you that the front hubs stick out 10mm more than the rear
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2012 | 01:17 AM
  #11  
kevink2's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,331
Likes: 9
From: Delaware
2004 Mazda6, 1993 RX7
Originally Posted by Cleanbenz
Um... You aren't taking into account that the axles are different widths. Front track is wider than rear. Offsets of wheels matching means nothing. I promise you that the front hubs stick out 10mm more than the rear
Um... I did address the axles widths:

"As I understand it, front and rear hub face spacing is the same."

The data I have for the non-staggered Lux models, at least for the early W204's, listed the front track as 60.7", and rear at 60.8", .1" difference, which is about the same for me.

For the staggered 17" wheels, the rear tires are 20mm wider than the fronts, but the rear wheels also have 11mm more offset than the fronts. As I originally said, this puts the outer face of the tires with the same separation, front and rear for these staggered tires. But the rear track is 22mm less than the front track.

Your promise seems to be weak here unless there is a big difference in offsets for later models.

.
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2012 | 02:06 AM
  #12  
Knightmare69's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 16
From: Hong Kong
2010 C200 CGI
Originally Posted by kevink2

The data I have for the non-staggered Lux models, at least for the early W204's, listed the front track as 60.7", and rear at 60.8", .1" difference, which is about the same for me.
Weird, I actually run a wider spacer in the rear on my lux model just to flush all four corners. But based on your info (if I'm reading it correctly) they should've been the same all around to begin with?
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2012 | 08:32 AM
  #13  
Cleanbenz's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 455
Likes: 2
From: Lancaster, PA
2010 E350
Originally Posted by Knightmare69
Weird, I actually run a wider spacer in the rear on my lux model just to flush all four corners. But based on your info (if I'm reading it correctly) they should've been the same all around to begin with?
This is what I'm sayin, I do too so the info listed above contradicts what we physically run on our cars.
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2012 | 11:40 AM
  #14  
kevink2's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,331
Likes: 9
From: Delaware
2004 Mazda6, 1993 RX7
Originally Posted by Knightmare69
Weird, I actually run a wider spacer in the rear on my lux model just to flush all four corners. But based on your info (if I'm reading it correctly) they should've been the same all around to begin with?
By flush, do you mean by the eyeball, and not by measurment ? That could be the source of the contradiction. The surrounding fender geometry may differ front vs rear, to give the allusion of the need for rear spacers. Is the eye looking for a wider track at the rear? Or could I just be wrong ?

.

Last edited by kevink2; Dec 30, 2012 at 12:50 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 30, 2012 | 12:52 PM
  #15  
Knightmare69's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,375
Likes: 16
From: Hong Kong
2010 C200 CGI
Originally Posted by kevink2
By flush, do you mean by the eyeball, and not by measurment ? That could be the source of the cantradiction. The surrounding fender geometry may differ front the rear to give the allusion of the need for rear spacers. Or I could be wrong ?

.
Yes by eyeball, when I was running my wheels without spacers you could clearly see that the fronts stuck out more than the rears. It's possible that the fenders have something to do with it as in some angles the front fender can seem more aggressive than the rears also noting that the position is also different. In the end, adding my spacers have visually flushed all 4 corners for me.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2015 | 11:24 AM
  #16  
neo9080's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
2012 c250 sport, amg 18 wheels, H&R sport, nav, 12mm rear 15 front spacers, Godhand front splitter
W204 spacers

I have a 2012 c250 and am running 20mm on the rear and 12mm up front. I have the amg 18 wheels and it looks perfect. Aggressive but I like it. I also have the upgrades factory sport suspension so it's a bit lower from the factory.
Reply
Old Nov 21, 2016 | 09:12 PM
  #17  
Young_Euro's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
C250 Sedan sport
Anyone running these spacers or something similar?
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2019 | 04:22 AM
  #18  
aznmode's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,545
Likes: 87
From: San Jose, CA
2010 c300
Im thinkint of running 10mm front 15mm rear spacers. My stock set up below. Wondering if I'll have rubbing issues.




Last edited by aznmode; Aug 7, 2019 at 12:49 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2019 | 11:42 PM
  #19  
aper3z's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: Miami
2014 Mercedes Benz c250 Coupe
w204 c250 17 inch rims which spacers mm ??

What's up guys i have a 2014 c250 coupe with 17 inch rims i didn't know with which spacers mm size to go with on the front and rear rims! i wanted to even the wheels with the fenders, kill that gap. i noticed my rear rims hide more inside than the front. I am on stock suspension.



Last edited by aper3z; Sep 3, 2019 at 11:48 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2020 | 02:55 AM
  #20  
Connor Lewis's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
2010 c300 sport
Originally Posted by aper3z
What's up guys i have a 2014 c250 coupe with 17 inch rims i didn't know with which spacers mm size to go with on the front and rear rims! i wanted to even the wheels with the fenders, kill that gap. i noticed my rear rims hide more inside than the front. I am on stock suspension.



did you ever end up throwing spacers on your stock wheels? I have the Same wheels on my sport c300 2010 and I’m trying to figure out what to do. I want wheels flush with fender and I do have staggered tires
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2020 | 08:20 PM
  #21  
Connor Lewis's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
2010 c300 sport
Originally Posted by kevink2
Um... I did address the axles widths:

"As I understand it, front and rear hub face spacing is the same."

The data I have for the non-staggered Lux models, at least for the early W204's, listed the front track as 60.7", and rear at 60.8", .1" difference, which is about the same for me.

For the staggered 17" wheels, the rear tires are 20mm wider than the fronts, but the rear wheels also have 11mm more offset than the fronts. As I originally said, this puts the outer face of the tires with the same separation, front and rear for these staggered tires. But the rear track is 22mm less than the front track.

Your promise seems to be weak here unless there is a big difference in offsets for later models.

.

I have the basic 17” stock sport rims. I would love to have the wheels flush with the fenders but not sticking out past the fender. So what size should I do
Reply

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:10 PM.

story-0
Six Gift Ideas Your AMG Loving Dad or Grad Will Cherish

Slideshow: Six gift ideas your AMG loving dad or grad will cherish.

By | 2026-06-03 17:26:18


VIEW MORE
story-1
7 Craziest Things AMG Gas Ever Built

Slideshow: Sometimes AMG builds fast sedans. Other times, it builds twin-turbo V12 land missiles and six-wheeled off-road monsters.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-26 17:59:58


VIEW MORE
story-2
New Electric Mercedes-AMG GT 4-Door Coupe Unveiled: 10 Things You Need to Know

Slideshow: Mercedes-AMG's new electric GT 4-Door Coupe trades combustion for software, synthetic noise, and more than 1,100 horsepower.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-20 20:08:15


VIEW MORE
story-3
6 Mercedes Models That Did NOT Age Well (But Are Somehow Still Cool)

Slideshow: Not every Mercedes design becomes timeless, some feel stuck in the era they came from.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:09:07


VIEW MORE
story-4
Manual Mercedes? 6 Times Sindelfingen Let Drivers Have All The Fun

Slideshow: Yes, Mercedes built manual cars, and some of them are far more interesting than you'd expect.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-02 12:36:58


VIEW MORE
story-5
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren

Slideshow: A one-of-one U.S.-spec Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren Roadster became even rarer after a factory-backed transformation at McLaren's headquarters.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-29 11:19:28


VIEW MORE
story-6
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

Slideshow: Before curves took over, Mercedes mastered the art of the straight line, and some of those shapes still look right today.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-25 12:05:49


VIEW MORE
story-7
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction

Slideshow: The 190E Evolution II shows how a homologation necessity became a six-figure collector icon.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-22 17:53:47


VIEW MORE
story-8
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know

Slideshow: Mercedes is turning one of its core nameplates electric, and the details show just how serious this shift is.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-21 13:58:06


VIEW MORE
story-9
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know

Slideshow: Faster charging, longer range, and a controversial steer-by-wire system define the latest evolution of Mercedes-Benz EQS.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-15 10:35:34


VIEW MORE