2015 Mercedes C-Class Interior Official Pictures


Namely ~ we know it all ~ you can't tell us anything. The truth is that they are sometimes wrong even in their own market & generally wrong internationally. US business models do not translate well to international markets. It is the reason that so many US Corporations are not extracting the potential earnings from foreign markets that they should. I could name a long list of companies as an example.
I am willing however to name a few Corporations that get it correct in international markets. Namely BASF & Unilever due to an open mind to thinking globally but acting locally. Many could learn from them.
Before I'm accused of being anti American. Nothing could be further from the truth. I love the US, I lived there for a long while & some of my finest friends are American
'nuff said!
In all seriousness, though, I do like conservative. Conservative usually ages well and is usually pretty reliable....
, but then i sat in the car, it looked pretty good to me...you dont really notice the back of the screen or anything anyways.

Maybe they need to differentiate between Luxury & Sport models in the US with a different software set. They do it with AMG.
- The profit comes not from the transmission but from avoiding volume decrement, and associated vehicle margin, for manual buyers. (Side note: manual transmissions typically have higher variable cost than do automatics, so profitability does favor standardizing automatics for lower cost and higher revenue as a priceable feature in the pricing roll up.) I used Designo as an example of a profitable low volume item, with tremendous APEI complexity, although the point apparently was not clear.
- 5% is adequate vehicle volume to offset most costs (including N.A. certification) and be reasonably profitable, but possibly not versus plant facilitization issues. 5% is accurate demand. "NO" is not. At a 3% build, they stocked out and left unmet demand in the market.
- But, back to the original and key point, MBUSA thinks they are making "serious drivers cars", witness their C Class marketing/advertising strategies. The fallacy of their premise was the earlier point you actually contested with finding "sportiness" in larger, all automatic cars C Class cars. That is how this discussion started and was the primary point before the manual trans tangent became dominant. I'm glad we are back to the original topic that MBs (other than AMG) are even less and less sporty/serious driver's cars. It seems we finally found some agreement.

1. Tell it to Mercedes-Benz USA as you seem to know better than they do. Apparently they disagree.
2. Ditto
3. It's all marketing. BMW does the same thing and they stopped making the ultimate driving machine years ago.
Mercedes' were never serious drivers cars. Again. NEVER. If you wanted a more serious car you have to buy an AMG. Not sure why you thought otherwise.
M
Last edited by Germancar1; Oct 30, 2013 at 06:34 PM.
The Best of Mercedes & AMG





