Direct injection troubles?
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 295
Likes: 24
From: Edmonton Area
2007 CLK550 Coupe, 2003 CL600, 2012
Direct injection troubles?
I just found out that the direct injection engines will eventually have carbon deposit problems on the intake valves. Is this a problem in the 2012 C350? Does anybody run a catch can in the pcv circut? How about just dump the pcv to the ground like the old days?
#2
Fortunately for you and fellow MB owners you should be fine. No need to run a catch can either.
MBs air oil separator does a good enough job such that the oil that is on the intake valve reaches a steady state and doesn't cause any performance issues.
Do your oil changes with the approved motor oil and you'll be ok.
The following users liked this post:
Kelvin Bellrose (11-02-2018)
#3
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 4,709
Likes: 549
From: Milwaukee, WI
2010 C300 4MATIC........ 2011 C63 AMG.............. 2015 CLS400 4MATIC.....
This is a topic I know too much about.
Fortunately for you and fellow MB owners you should be fine. No need to run a catch can either.
MBs air oil separator does a good enough job such that the oil that is on the intake valve reaches a steady state and doesn't cause any performance issues.
Do your oil changes with the approved motor oil and you'll be ok.
Fortunately for you and fellow MB owners you should be fine. No need to run a catch can either.
MBs air oil separator does a good enough job such that the oil that is on the intake valve reaches a steady state and doesn't cause any performance issues.
Do your oil changes with the approved motor oil and you'll be ok.
#5
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 295
Likes: 24
From: Edmonton Area
2007 CLK550 Coupe, 2003 CL600, 2012
This is a topic I know too much about.
Fortunately for you and fellow MB owners you should be fine. No need to run a catch can either.
MBs air oil separator does a good enough job such that the oil that is on the intake valve reaches a steady state and doesn't cause any performance issues.
Do your oil changes with the approved motor oil and you'll be ok.
Fortunately for you and fellow MB owners you should be fine. No need to run a catch can either.
MBs air oil separator does a good enough job such that the oil that is on the intake valve reaches a steady state and doesn't cause any performance issues.
Do your oil changes with the approved motor oil and you'll be ok.
#6
MBWorld Fanatic!
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 4,709
Likes: 549
From: Milwaukee, WI
2010 C300 4MATIC........ 2011 C63 AMG.............. 2015 CLS400 4MATIC.....
Trending Topics
#9
#10
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 295
Likes: 24
From: Edmonton Area
2007 CLK550 Coupe, 2003 CL600, 2012
I don't mind if my thread gets hijacked, it's all good.
Any kind of fuel treatment won't help because it's injected after the intake valves.
Any kind of fuel treatment won't help because it's injected after the intake valves.
#11
The only problem with Redline SI1 and such is that you can only run it a tank or two before an oil change. Due to the properties of that fuel additive, you don't want to run it at every fill up as some of it does end up in the oil (this is normal, just like fuel dilution, to a minor extent) as it does lower the flashpoint and increase the volatility of the engine oil.
#12
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 295
Likes: 24
From: Edmonton Area
2007 CLK550 Coupe, 2003 CL600, 2012
It must be a very persistant chemical to be able to go through the combustion stage and still be useful as a cleaner after it makes it’s its way through the pcv system.
99% has to go straight out the exhaust pipe, keeping that clean for sure.
99% has to go straight out the exhaust pipe, keeping that clean for sure.
Last edited by Kelvin Bellrose; 11-02-2018 at 08:10 PM.
#13
My wife's 2012 SLK 350 has the same engine and is going strong. I had a 2006 Audi A4 with DI 2.0 FSI and while I loved the car, it would need carbon cleaning every ~60k miles. MB also uses a multi-spark system, hoping that contributes to carbon free valves.
The following users liked this post:
Kelvin Bellrose (11-02-2018)
#14
It's also why I never ever ever put in any gas other than Shell Premium or Chevron Premium. For me I can't get Chevron, but both fuel brands attach that special nitrogen molecule that helps their fuel additives survive combustion as well. Shell markets it as "Shell Nitro", and with Shell Premium where I live, there's 0 ethanol in it, which helps the engine oil resist fuel dilution which helps it not have as much oil vapour that ends up back through the PCV valve.
Long story short, with DI engines, stick to proven ones like the MB application, stick with Shell Premium or Chevron Techron, and throw a fuel additive like Redline SI1 before every oil change. Don't worry about anything else.
#16
The following users liked this post:
Kelvin Bellrose (11-02-2018)
#17
Yeah, loved the A4, Audi bought it back, shocker right?. Like you I like Audi, but I haven't bought one since. My 204 was flawless and an absolute tank.
[QUOTE=superangrypenguin;7593587]The latter may, but you are a brave brave man with that 2.0 FSI motor. Not only does it have serious carbon intake valve buildup issues, but the cam follower is a flat tappet design. If that gets punched through, then you'll need a new HPFP. Also, that motor is prone to systemic and repetitive coil pack failure. Don't get me wrong, I loved driving that car, but it was a nightmare to maintain so sold it for the W204 and it was a great decision. I miss that B7 A4, but man...that still has me hesitant to buy another Audi.
[QUOTE=superangrypenguin;7593587]The latter may, but you are a brave brave man with that 2.0 FSI motor. Not only does it have serious carbon intake valve buildup issues, but the cam follower is a flat tappet design. If that gets punched through, then you'll need a new HPFP. Also, that motor is prone to systemic and repetitive coil pack failure. Don't get me wrong, I loved driving that car, but it was a nightmare to maintain so sold it for the W204 and it was a great decision. I miss that B7 A4, but man...that still has me hesitant to buy another Audi.
The following users liked this post:
superangrypenguin (11-04-2018)
#18
If anything, I might just keep the 204 and buy another car, because I feel like I'm going to have a serious case of "man, I should have never sold that car", if I do trade it in.
The 204 is an attestation that if a carmaker does their homework, it pays off. The 204 remains, to date, the most "driven" car prior to launch by Mercedes Benz. It covered the most miles and spent the most time being tested by the boffins in Stuttgart prior to series production. No other model, since this model, has been tested this much, both from a times, and km perspective.
It shows.
#19
The interesting thing is you are contemplating going from a compact, nimble and relatively speaking simplistic car (<-- a good thing in terms of reliability) to one that is very large (even SWB) and tech laden. I've followed most of your posts, you know what you are getting into. I understand what you like about the A8. I'm sure it will be quite nice. The 222 is where I'd be in your criteria, excepting the drive. A 740i is a nice combination of size, power and tech that drives like a boat, but less so than the others (even with the new Audi suspension tech). I'd keep the C300 as it is worth more to you than it will be on trade. My C238 is the best car I have owned, very closely followed by my 204 (C350).
You know, when I read this post I literally laughed out loud because it hit close to home. There's a million things I look for in a car, and I'm a very particular person, but there's a saying about the devil you know versus the devil you don't. In the case of the W204, it's been a tank, and it just keeps on running and running and running. It's literally the first reason why any of us buy cars in the first place (to get from A->B), and I will say the gamble that the next car will be as reliable as the 204 (despite all of the things I want in the next car being thinks that make me salivate) is one that makes me flip flop on buying another car.
If anything, I might just keep the 204 and buy another car, because I feel like I'm going to have a serious case of "man, I should have never sold that car", if I do trade it in.
The 204 is an attestation that if a carmaker does their homework, it pays off. The 204 remains, to date, the most "driven" car prior to launch by Mercedes Benz. It covered the most miles and spent the most time being tested by the boffins in Stuttgart prior to series production. No other model, since this model, has been tested this much, both from a times, and km perspective.
It shows.
If anything, I might just keep the 204 and buy another car, because I feel like I'm going to have a serious case of "man, I should have never sold that car", if I do trade it in.
The 204 is an attestation that if a carmaker does their homework, it pays off. The 204 remains, to date, the most "driven" car prior to launch by Mercedes Benz. It covered the most miles and spent the most time being tested by the boffins in Stuttgart prior to series production. No other model, since this model, has been tested this much, both from a times, and km perspective.
It shows.
The following users liked this post:
superangrypenguin (11-04-2018)
#20
This is a topic I know too much about.
Fortunately for you and fellow MB owners you should be fine. No need to run a catch can either.
MBs air oil separator does a good enough job such that the oil that is on the intake valve reaches a steady state and doesn't cause any performance issues.
Do your oil changes with the approved motor oil and you'll be ok.
Fortunately for you and fellow MB owners you should be fine. No need to run a catch can either.
MBs air oil separator does a good enough job such that the oil that is on the intake valve reaches a steady state and doesn't cause any performance issues.
Do your oil changes with the approved motor oil and you'll be ok.
I know we had this debate but I just emptied my catch can after 6000km and about 100ml of oil came out. It was definitely not moisture or water but oil. If you plan on keeping the car long term, specially a direct injection, I would do as much as possible to prevent carbon build up, or at least greatly reduce it.
#21
Putting cleaners in the gas will do absolutely nothing on DI engines unfortunately since the injectors will never spray the cleaner where the carbon actually builds up. You need to run a cleaner through the intake before oil changes, that will help a lot and actually clean the back of the intake valves.
#22
Putting cleaners in the gas will do absolutely nothing on DI engines unfortunately since the injectors will never spray the cleaner where the carbon actually builds up. You need to run a cleaner through the intake before oil changes, that will help a lot and actually clean the back of the intake valves.
There are no cleaners that actually do a decent job with what you are referring to. The BG GDI top cleaner thing did basically nothing for my old DI Audi. Once it forms, if the carbon buildup does not achieve steady state and keeps on building, you're f*****.
I feel like this thread is going to derail itself, but I have wasted 6 years of my life with monthly UOAs, and looked inside using a boroscope of intake valves during that entire time.
The Redline SI1 cleaner almost doubled the amount of mileage it would take for the old Audi (and my old RS4) to require a manual carbon clean. For a decently built DI engine like the MB ones, this issue shouldn't even rear its ugly head, but throw in a bottle of PEA based fuel based cleaner for good measure.
Last edited by superangrypenguin; 11-04-2018 at 08:28 PM.
#23
I know we had this debate but I just emptied my catch can after 6000km and about 100ml of oil came out. It was definitely not moisture or water but oil. If you plan on keeping the car long term, specially a direct injection, I would do as much as possible to prevent carbon build up, or at least greatly reduce it.
The theory is that all of that crap that would go past the intake valve - the PEA additive would have some effect to keeping the carbon/oil vapour from sticking.
This would only work with engines that have a decent air oil separator in the first place. The old 2.0 FSI engines from Audi were hopeless, as an example, and no matter what you did, catch can or not, your car would slowly die of cancer.
The following users liked this post:
W204Motorsports (11-04-2018)
#24
Has not been an issue yet even on the higer mileage engines we pull apart for various reasons. Yes some of the valves don't look clean like a port-injected engine, but MB doesn't have nearly the valve build up problems I've seen with BMW or Chevy engines even.
The following users liked this post:
superangrypenguin (11-04-2018)
#25
It's interesting, for me, to see how the air oil separators work for the M276/M278 engines. The 6 cylinder has one air oil separator, and the 8 has two. So that's odd. I wonder if the 6 cylinder gunks up sooner as 1 separator has to service 6 cylinders?
Anyways, sorry. Back to my original question, if I may ask. I'm curious do you notice say a 40,000 mile engine has the same level of carbon as a 120,000 mile engine? Curious when do you see steady state on these engines from an intake valve carbon buildup.
I know CELs, misfires and such as a result of carbon buildup does not occur on MB. It's like the Stuttgart boffins have cured cancer, and good for them.