C Class (W205) C 180 BlueTec,C 200 BlueTec,C 220 BlueTec,C 220 BlueTec BlueEfficiency,C 250 BlueTec,C 300 BlueTec Hybridplus,C 180,C 180 BlueEfficiency,C 200,C 250,C 300,C 400 Plug-in Hybrid,C 400

Burmester vs Basic Audio

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 12-28-2015, 07:07 PM
  #126  
Member
 
DutchTim1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Mercedes C W205, Previous: Mercedes ML W164
Have a look at this video of my new Mercedes C Class 2.0 liter petrol (price 77k euro's). I think a positive mark about the burmester is that it just looks better than the standard black stereos. If you want I can make a separate video for the burmester sound. Have a look here --> Hope you guys like it.
Old 12-28-2015, 07:45 PM
  #127  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Mike5215's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 7,653
Received 556 Likes on 473 Posts
2016 C300
The Audio 20 consists of 4 4" midrange speakers in the doors and a subwoofer in the passenger footwell. It lacks enough drivers for decent sound. The 4" mids in the doors pull double duty as the tweeters, and the sub has to cover everything else. Not ideal.

The Burmester is a proper system, with plenty of power and a good mix of drivers. There is no comparison in terms of audio quality. I spent around $5k modding the audio in my W221 (see link in sig), but I wouldn't change a thing in the Burmester.
Old 12-31-2015, 07:23 AM
  #128  
Senior Member

 
l3it3r's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Hagerstown Maryland
Posts: 336
Received 24 Likes on 15 Posts
2015 W205 C400 4Matic
This morning, as I was waiting for my Van Pool driver to show up at the Park and Ride, I decided to truly test out my Burmester system. I found a great track on Apple Music, and then cranked the system all the way up. I realized that it checks a box that I have always wanted ever since I started buying cars: A sound system that sounds as good or better than the headphones I'm using day to day. The Burmester handled the very loud playback fantastically and put a smile on my face.

Wouldn't hesitate to check that box if I were getting another C, and it's a must have for the GLC that my wife and I are considering currently.
Old 02-29-2016, 10:58 PM
  #129  
Member
 
jamespaul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: New York, New York
Posts: 75
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
GLC300 4Matic
if you like music and do medium to long roadtrips. Burmester is a must.

Stock C Class system is quite quite poor.
Old 03-01-2016, 12:30 AM
  #130  
Super Member
 
gfmohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Eastern Massachusetts
Posts: 789
Received 45 Likes on 39 Posts
2021 E450, 2020 C43, 2015 C300, 2007 C280
Thumbs up Burmester system is better than a 2015 E-Class

I just got done driving a loaner 2015 E-Class for a week. The Burmester system in my 2015 C300 is much better than the Harmon-Kardon Logic 7 system in the E-Class. For example, the Logic 7 has one setting for surround sound: one and off. The Burmester has three settings (in addition to on-off): Front, Rear, and Both. In all settings, the surround effect of the Burmester is superior. Also, the Burmester system has better defined bass.
Old 03-01-2016, 08:20 AM
  #131  
Banned
 
Maritime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 376
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
2016 c450
Originally Posted by gfmohn
I just got done driving a loaner 2015 E-Class for a week. The Burmester system in my 2015 C300 is much better than the Harmon-Kardon Logic 7 system in the E-Class. For example, the Logic 7 has one setting for surround sound: one and off. The Burmester has three settings (in addition to on-off): Front, Rear, and Both. In all settings, the surround effect of the Burmester is superior. Also, the Burmester system has better defined bass.
I haven't changed any delivery defaults of the Burmester. I like but I'm not overwhelmed by the sound. I really haven't noticed a surround effect.
Old 03-08-2016, 09:58 AM
  #132  
Junior Member
 
djstardust's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
mb c 250 coupe
in c class burmester audio is 590 watts 13 speakers.
in c class coupe(c205) burmester audio is 640 watts 14 speakers.
does anyone know where is or what kind of speaker is 14th one.
it is same in glc(ie 640w 14sp)
Old 03-09-2016, 12:10 AM
  #133  
Super Member
 
gfmohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Eastern Massachusetts
Posts: 789
Received 45 Likes on 39 Posts
2021 E450, 2020 C43, 2015 C300, 2007 C280
New, duplicate thread

Originally Posted by ashap
I couldn't find any exact specs online regarding the Burmester sound system in the C Class (e.g. where are all of the speakers located, etc...) but knowing already that it's a 13 speaker 590-watt system, after some searching online, I was actually able to find it in a document (attached to this post) pertaining to two different Burmester systems available for the S Class (which I'm assuming the lower-end one is the same system as the C, because it's showing it also as a 13 speaker 590-watt system)

Anyways, I was really surprised to see that there is actually no designated sub for this system! Can anyone confirm if the image attached is correct for the C? When I test drove the C450 a few months ago, the system sounded great, and the bass did sound quite full... but was still surprising to see on this document that there's no subwoofer at all for this upgraded sound system...

Anyone that listens to music with a lot of bass, are you happy with the sound?

I have brought this informative graphic over from a new thread "Burmester Sound System for the C Class (bass/subwoofer)." I am encouraging ashap and the others (all two of them) to bring his discussion to this thread.

Last edited by gfmohn; 03-09-2016 at 01:07 PM.
Old 03-09-2016, 07:18 AM
  #134  
Junior Member
 
djstardust's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
mb c 250 coupe
today i went to the Mercedes dealer in cyprus,
i downloaded c205 user manual on my phone.
in that user manual for c coupe it says 14 speakers 640w
i asked the dealer about this.in their documents it says 13 speakers 590w like
sedan c.
in sedan 8 speakers are 4 midranges plus 4 tweeters in doors. two subwoofers or woofers(whatever they are called) in footwell of driver and front passenger, one center speaker on top of dashboard and two on the rear parsel shelf total 13,
in c sedan front tweeters are in corners of mirror housing but in coupe as the mirrors are attached on the doors panels the tweeter are aside midrange drivers.


regarding my c204 harman kardon sound system , bass and treble adjustment diminishes when you turn up volume, especially subwoofer bass level stays at a constant level after a point in volume control which is always annoys me.(may be its like that to stop woofer going into clipping range )
i hope it is not the same in burmester system.
on a new c coupe in showroom with standard audio 20 cd i checked the equalizer settings and happily found out that the adjustment doesn't neutralize with higher volume levels. but strangely bass notes are faded out when fader is set at full rear . may be because of woofer location in front footwell.
Old 03-10-2016, 05:18 PM
  #135  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Mr. J's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 1,564
Received 263 Likes on 207 Posts
C450, GLC43
Originally Posted by c200amgline
I will most likely be getting my C200 in less than a week and I would like to know whether it is worth waiting 5 months to get place an order to get the Burmester audio sound system. It is $3080 extra in my country just for the Burmester.

Could someone please give me feedback regarding the basic audio?
If you have command, then you should upgrade. If you are not going with command, then it would make much more sense to pour that money into an aftermarket system.
Old 03-10-2016, 06:03 PM
  #136  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
dieseldoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2,235
Received 159 Likes on 150 Posts
2016 GLC300 Dakota Brown on Espresso Brown Leather, 2014 C250 Sport Diamond Silver
The Burmester sounds fantastic. I have it on my GLC. Well worth it.
Old 03-10-2016, 10:28 PM
  #137  
Newbie
 
whelland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2015 C300 W205
Burmester Audio

Anyone who truly appreciates music will want the Burmester Audio... As a guitarist the sound is just fantastic... The bass is thunderous & clean with crystal clear highs... I thought my E-Class sounded good until I bought this car... And not to mention there is very little loss at high volume too... (as far as I can tell)... Very Satisfied!!!
Old 04-20-2016, 05:11 AM
  #138  
Junior Member
 
jonta_dj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sweden, Europe
Posts: 42
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
S500 w222, W205
Coming from a W204 with standard audio. In my oppinion standard audio in W205 is not worse. I think the bass in W205 is less boomy (it's positive), as in more firm, and the audio benefits from having smaller speakers in the doors. Of course this system can't really compete with a high end stereo system but when I need that I listen to music at home.
Old 04-20-2016, 09:11 AM
  #139  
Senior Member
 
NYbenzzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 295
Received 19 Likes on 18 Posts
2016 C300
hate to burst your bubbles fellas, but it seems the burmester ain't all that:

https://mbworld.org/forums/c-class-w...ster-myth.html
The following 2 users liked this post by NYbenzzz:
getto (04-21-2016), TheTherapist (07-13-2016)
Old 04-20-2016, 11:17 AM
  #140  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Mike5215's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 7,653
Received 556 Likes on 473 Posts
2016 C300
No, although the guy who plays guitar is correct. The midrange where guitars, especially acoustic guitars live is decent. Now if he were a bass player or drummer he'd have some complaints
Old 04-21-2016, 03:47 PM
  #141  
Member
 
getto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 82
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
00
sounds good

Originally Posted by Mike5215
No, although the guy who plays guitar is correct. The midrange where guitars, especially acoustic guitars live is decent. Now if he were a bass player or drummer he'd have some complaints
Mike,
You are too polite
Old 06-08-2016, 12:04 AM
  #142  
Newbie
 
audiom3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Northern California
Posts: 13
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2016 C300
Hey everyone. I ordered a C300 with the Burmester Tweak. This is the first thread that I visited on the forums since audio is a HUGE part of my life (my user name is one that I've used since I owned a BMW M3 back in 1997). I have a pretty high end home stereo, so I have learned to always buy the best stereo in a car that the manufacturer offers. I listen to records 2-3 hours a day though a fantastic TT and Cartridge combo. I am hopeful I'll love the Burmester but also skeptical about all the positive posts in this thread. I have yet to hear a car stereo that I can crank up and not cringe due to harshness and muddy sound. I finally get to pick up the car tomorrow, so I'm going to give the system a good test. I'm bringing along some of my best mastered CDs for the ride home. Hopefully I'll be impressed!
Old 06-08-2016, 07:32 AM
  #143  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Mike5215's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 7,653
Received 556 Likes on 473 Posts
2016 C300
You're not going to be impressed. Trust me.

Four of the wispiest, paper coned, off the shelf 4" midranges in the doors you'll ever see, paired on passive (cap) crossovers to standard 1" silk dome tweets. Two 8" shallow mount "subs" in a resonating chamber in the front footwells that are supposed to fill the void up to the 4" and can't without getting sloppy and boomy. (No actual woofers in the car.)

That's the main speaker array. Three more dainty 4" (like that's what it needs) "surround" speakers. No Burmester sourced anything. Pretty speaker grilles though.

It's salvageable but the fix ain't cheap:

Www.w205audio.wordpress.com

PS, I picked up a vintage Marantz 6100 TT last year with an Empire cartridge. Rediscovering vinyl. There's a service called The Edit that texts you album recommendations. If you reply Yes they ship it out. Not expensive.

Last edited by Mike5215; 06-08-2016 at 11:45 AM.
The following users liked this post:
audiom3 (06-10-2016)
Old 06-08-2016, 09:56 AM
  #144  
Member
 
getto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 82
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
00
I concur
Old 06-08-2016, 10:02 AM
  #145  
Super Member
 
TheTherapist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Australia
Posts: 847
Received 30 Likes on 22 Posts
2004 W211 E55 AMG >>gone but not forgotten > W123 280E > W124 E280 > W126 380SE
Originally Posted by audiom3
Hey everyone. I ordered a C300 with the Burmester Tweak. This is the first thread that I visited on the forums since audio is a HUGE part of my life (my user name is one that I've used since I owned a BMW M3 back in 1997). I have a pretty high end home stereo, so I have learned to always buy the best stereo in a car that the manufacturer offers. I listen to records 2-3 hours a day though a fantastic TT and Cartridge combo. I am hopeful I'll love the Burmester but also skeptical about all the positive posts in this thread. I have yet to hear a car stereo that I can crank up and not cringe due to harshness and muddy sound. I finally get to pick up the car tomorrow, so I'm going to give the system a good test. I'm bringing along some of my best mastered CDs for the ride home. Hopefully I'll be impressed!
Originally Posted by Mike5215
You're not going to be impressed. Trust me.

It's salvageable but the fix ain't cheap:
I'll be interested to hear your impressions. I do honestly hope you are not as disappointed as Mike infers. I have yet to experience the Burmester in all its glory (or lack thereof), but have always been demanding insofar as what I expect from car audio. I have installed aftermarket audio in a couple of the Mercedes I have owned (using Focal speakers) and endured a few trials and tribulations in search of that magical quality where the audio takes you on its own journey. Many times I have intentionally driven slower and slower when nearing home so I could listen through to the end of a track; or even cruise leisurely through the neighborhood side-streets lest the sparkling fidelity surrounding me end prematurely.

Interestingly I have found the main influence pertinent to creating wondrous car audio is in fact the acoustics within the vehicle; the inherent shape and size of the interior coupled with materials used. The "solidity" of the interior is also paramount in achieving this mobile audio nirvana, in other words you want to hear a deeper non resonating "thud" when you knock on interior surfaces with your fist rather than a hollow reverberating plastic sound. Mercedes are normally ideal in this regard whereas a Japanese vehicle (for instance) will always sound hollow with less presence and authority in comparison regardless of hardware.

Last edited by TheTherapist; 06-08-2016 at 10:08 AM.
Old 06-08-2016, 10:28 AM
  #146  
Super Member
 
gfmohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Eastern Massachusetts
Posts: 789
Received 45 Likes on 39 Posts
2021 E450, 2020 C43, 2015 C300, 2007 C280
Dead links

Originally Posted by Mike5215
....
It's salvageable but the fix ain't cheap:
Www.w205audio.wordpress.com

PS, I picked up a vintage Marantz 6100 TT last year with an Empire cartridge. Rediscovering vinyl. There's a service called The Edit that texts you album recommendations. If you reply Yes they ship it out. Not crazy expensive.

Attachment 332909

Attachment 332908
The links to your attachments are dead. I get another MBWorld screen with the message "Invalid Attachment specified. If you followed a valid link, please notify the administrator".

Your link to Www.w205audio.wordpress.com is also dead, at least as a link. Clicking on it merely results in another iteration of the page. Of course, it is a valid URL, so readers can copy and paste it into their browsers.
Old 06-08-2016, 10:33 AM
  #147  
Senior Member
 
screw991le's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Revere Beach
Posts: 396
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
2010 E63 AMG
Ok question, rated from 1-3 you opinions. H&K 7 Logic, B&O, Burm.

Forget the basic stock systems for all above. Which do you like and why?
Old 06-08-2016, 10:35 AM
  #148  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Mike5215's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 7,653
Received 556 Likes on 473 Posts
2016 C300
True. The S Class in particular is a well insulated listening space, although I Hushmatted my 221 extensively when I re did the audio, mostly to quell rattles.

The C is quite a bit less vault-like. Even with acoustic glass, and despite having a solid feel on the road, wind noise and tire noise are a problem, most noticeably at highway speeds.

My wife and I on the drive home from trading the S550 for the C300:

"It's really loud in here!"

"I HAVE NO IDEA WHAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT."

Plus, the stock audio system couldn't get on top of it, because pushing the volume up added too much harshness and boom.

The mod + Hushmat + Michelin Pilot SS tires did the trick though.
Old 06-08-2016, 10:54 AM
  #149  
MBWorld Fanatic!
iTrader: (1)
 
alexasa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 3,202
Received 667 Likes on 525 Posts
c
I feel like opinions on sound systems are only to be taken with a huge grain of salt.

Most of these people expect their sound systems, to somehow, miraculously, up sample the quality of radio output.

Seriously? I don't care if it's HD radio, etc. You're only going to get as good of sound that the transmission is extending.

I heard the same thing over on the Audi forums. Just think it's silly.

Plug in a SD card with FLAC files on it, then do your evaluation of the difference between the sound systems.
Old 06-08-2016, 11:41 AM
  #150  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Mike5215's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 7,653
Received 556 Likes on 473 Posts
2016 C300
Since the DAC in the car can only handle maximum sample rates of 44k and a bit depth of 16, anything in FLAC that will play from the SD has already been down sampled to CD quality anyway. Playing the source CD would get you the same result. Although I agree it's more convenient than carrying discs around.

If you really want to hear something cool, run a hi res audio file through a DAC capable of 256k/24 bit playback and a really good system. Blows away CD, which is itself a lossy format relative to the studio master. But the enormous file sizes make hi res impractical in the car. I have 12TB of capacity on the home system. A single three minute track in hi res runs 300 mb.

But yeah, terrestrial radio, and satellite radio are non starters. Has anyone here suggested otherwise? There are so many ways to play music in the car why use the radio?

Unfortunately, the problems with the Burmester are baked in and have little to do with the source material. Sometimes in a deficient system, better source material exacerbates the shortcomings.
The following users liked this post:
alexasa (06-08-2016)


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Burmester vs Basic Audio



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:01 PM.