C400 0-60 times, 4.6 seconds? wow
Mercedes is going really match the BMW 3/4-Series car for car this time. Expect a coupe and a convertible with these same engines. A C450 Convertible would be a better car than today's E350/E400 Convertible IMO.
Then we have to address the new I6 engines that are supposed to arrive for the 2017 model year. I would suspect that the model designations won't change, but the hp will. We may even see the C300 replaced by a I6 in low turbo form and the C250 re-introduced to the U.S. market with power similar to or more than the current C300. All just my speculation.
M
This C400 is decent!
Of course not. There is also a 12k differential base price and no AWD.
Different cars for different purposes. The AMG is like my s2000 (though much faster), a fair weather car, not a daily driver for anywhere where snow may happen. Of course the AMG is also a collectible. The C400 is an everyday car, just a very nice, fast one.
Am I the only one who would rather pay that little bit more at that point for the similar performance, but with the convenience of never having to go to the gas station and environmental friendliness?
Last edited by mihaelb; Oct 27, 2014 at 12:36 AM. Reason: wrong stats...
Am I the only one who would rather pay that little bit more at that point for the similar performance, but with the convenience of never having to go to the gas station and environmental friendliness?
And don't worry, no one will ever force you to buy a c450, I promise. And there are many many tesla lovers out there you can relate to, lol! The tesla is in a performance league of it's own... Instant torque and 11 seconds or less in the 1/4... Hopefully it's a reliable car long term
Last edited by PeterUbers; Oct 27, 2014 at 01:41 AM.
M
And don't worry, no one will ever force you to buy a c450, I promise. And there are many many tesla lovers out there you can relate to, lol! The tesla is in a performance league of it's own... Instant torque and 11 seconds or less in the 1/4... Hopefully it's a reliable car long term
M
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
M
I guess we will see. I've read and heard lots over the years that was "definitive" and the exact opposite occurred
He makes a good point, for some it'll be something to consider... Though I think most people looking at amg or amg-lite do not have tesla on their radar at all
He makes a good point, for some it'll be something to consider... Though I think most people looking at amg or amg-lite do not have tesla on their radar at all
M
I guess we will see. I've read and heard lots over the years that was "definitive" and the exact opposite occurred
M
Is it just me, or are regular cars getting extremely fast? Autobytel just had their hands on the new C400 4MATIC and got some pretty interesting performance figures from the almost-entry-level Mercedes sedan.
Read the rest on the MBWorld homepage. >>
Those $20k are not 'recoverable' by going for an S550 or Rolls Royce.
In the case of the Tesla, you get an an electric car, which saves you money at the pump, saves you tonnes of times by not having to GO TO the pump to beginwith, bundled with a cleaner conscience with the environment, and those 20K don't seem like that much (if at all) of a premium.
Those $20k are not 'recoverable' by going for an S550 or Rolls Royce.
In the case of the Tesla, you get an an electric car, which saves you money at the pump, saves you tonnes of times by not having to GO TO the pump to beginwith, bundled with a cleaner conscience with the environment, and those 20K don't seem like that much (if at all) of a premium.
The Tesla is a fad. It only works as transportation if you're trip is within its modest range. If not prepare for a multihour layover where ever you go. As to the super performance, a few runs at full tilt will cut your distance by half. In general its a self indulgent toy for those with the money to show of their pseudo concern for the environment. The fact is if you are truly green you buy a cheap 4 cylinder car with excellent mileage like a Honda Fit.
Those $20k are not 'recoverable' by going for an S550 or Rolls Royce.
In the case of the Tesla, you get an an electric car, which saves you money at the pump, saves you tonnes of times by not having to GO TO the pump to beginwith, bundled with a cleaner conscience with the environment, and those 20K don't seem like that much (if at all) of a premium.
I know what the Tesla is, it still isn't a direct competitor to the C-Class.
M
Fad? The Model S alone will have sold 60,000 cars by the end of this year. Some fad.
On the odd occasion that I would go on a long trip, and not want to make stops to refuel (I'm assuming that you are referring to a trip that won't be anywhere near a supercharger, which charges your car fast and free, or near the quick-swap battery terminals where they can swap your battery ask in 90 seconds), I can rent a gas car. For 95% of the population 95%of their driving is 100km a day or so. The Tesla 85D's range (combined EPA) is 265 miles, or over 400km.
As for your comments about range being cut on hard accelerations, that's the case for any car, gas or electric.
Honda Fit: that's your solution to environmental issues? Suggesting that people drive tiny, basic hatchbacks?
If I were looking at a fast luxury sports sedan like the C450, and was looking at a 70k bill, the Tesla would be a major consideration for me, and probably would win out. a 25% stretch just isn't that big, which is why so many that originally came to look at buying a C300 ended up bumping up to the C400 instead.
On the odd occasion that I would go on a long trip, and not want to make stops to refuel (I'm assuming that you are referring to a trip that won't be anywhere near a supercharger, which charges your car fast and free, or near the quick-swap battery terminals where they can swap your battery ask in 90 seconds), I can rent a gas car. For 95% of the population 95%of their driving is 100km a day or so. The Tesla 85D's range (combined EPA) is 265 miles, or over 400km.
As for your comments about range being cut on hard accelerations, that's the case for any car, gas or electric.
Honda Fit: that's your solution to environmental issues? Suggesting that people drive tiny, basic hatchbacks?
If you are truly concerned with the environment you buy a car that has the smallest environmental footprint. A Fit uses a fraction of the resources a Tesla uses to build, operate, maintain, run and dispose of. Tiny? A Fit's interior room and luggage capacity rival a Tesla! A Tesla is the environmental statement for those that totally ignorant about the environment. Its the equivalent of those that discuss the problem of hunger while eating like roman senators at a 1000 dollar per person "benefit". BTW your comment about the Tesla range compared to a gas car is utterly ridiculous. Even with the additional 10000 optional battery pack a Tesla is nowhere as utilitarian as an internal combustion engine or a hybrid. The internal combustion engine replaced the electric car more than a century ago for the same reason that the Tesla will never be more than a novelty, a pound of gasoline contains ten times the energy density that a pound of the most modern batteries has. Furthermore that energy can be replenished in 5 minutes instead of hours that it takes to charge even the best batteries with the faster charger. Even with Tesla fast chargers, only 80% of the battery can be replenished quickly, thus you already cut 20% of the top. Add air conditioning or a heater and your range goes directly into the ****ter. If you wish to believe Elon Musk's BS, that's entirely up to you. People that can do simple math can figure out the reality.
BTW if you are truly so worried about the environment TAKE THE BUS! And like with the Tesla for those times that public transport won't do get a rental��
Last edited by c4004matic; Oct 28, 2014 at 12:56 AM.
Wow, almost everything you said above is wrong (and has been repeatedly proven as such-look up those points individually), and you call others ignorant?




If I were looking at a fast luxury sports sedan like the C450, and was looking at a 70k bill, the Tesla would be a major consideration for me, and probably would win out. a 25% stretch just isn't that big, which is why so many that originally came to look at buying a C300 ended up bumping up to the C400 instead.
People like you make me laugh.
Here learn something:
http://www.plugincars.com/tesla-mode...on-127409.html
BTW, the most expensive Tesla battery, which costs as much as the whole Fit carries 85 kw. One gallon of gasoline is 33.7 Kw empg, ergo the largest pack can be expected to produce as much energy as 2.5 gallons of gasoline. See, you simply cannot beat MATH. Even the car with the smallest tank about 12 gallons Can do 5 times the amount of work a Tesla can be refueled in five minutes, anywhere on the planet. I'm I making any inroads in that rusty trap called a mind? Or are you too star struck by the guy selling you snake oil with a little microphone hanging from his ear?
Last edited by c4004matic; Oct 28, 2014 at 08:00 AM.


