C Class (W205) C 180 BlueTec,C 200 BlueTec,C 220 BlueTec,C 220 BlueTec BlueEfficiency,C 250 BlueTec,C 300 BlueTec Hybridplus,C 180,C 180 BlueEfficiency,C 200,C 250,C 300,C 400 Plug-in Hybrid,C 400

C400 0-60 times, 4.6 seconds? wow

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 09-13-2014, 11:50 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
frank69m's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Newport Beach, Sunny CA
Posts: 253
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Audi S4
C400 0-60 times, 4.6 seconds? wow

Anyone see this in sports plus:








Pretty impressed....dare I say the c63 will be under 4.
Old 09-14-2014, 01:43 AM
  #2  
Junior Member
 
capflam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
c400 4matic
I can confirm that. Bought mine yesterday and it is truly brutal!
Old 09-14-2014, 04:00 AM
  #3  
Member
 
mikeyw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
S205
The C63 might even struggle to beat that without a very grippy start.
Old 09-14-2014, 08:02 AM
  #4  
Member
 
jbbeauso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Ajax, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
2015 C400 4matic W205
There is some debate as to how accurately those runs were clocked. The official time posted by MB is 5.2 seconds for 0-100 km/h although that might be a more conservative estimate. I noticed that the idle RPM just before the sport + run is pretty high. I wonder if some sort of launch control technique was used....

Last edited by jbbeauso; 09-14-2014 at 08:04 AM. Reason: correction
Old 09-14-2014, 11:06 PM
  #5  
Member
 
alihou007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 165
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
E55 Wagon
That is funny!!!!

Originally Posted by mikeyw
The C63 might even struggle to beat that without a very grippy start.
C63 0-60 times are anywhere between 3.6 to 4.3 depending on the MY.

C400 is no slouch but not in the same league as the C63...
Old 09-15-2014, 03:53 AM
  #6  
Junior Member
 
capflam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
c400 4matic
All I can tell you is that it is very very fast to get to the 60mph. Less than 5 sec would not surprise me at all based on my experience with my C400. I'll try to test on my own and with video but I'm pretty sure I am under 5 sec.
My previous car was at approx. 6.3 sec and this one is significantly faster, you can feel it right away especially in Sport + mode.

Last edited by capflam; 09-15-2014 at 04:17 AM.
Old 09-15-2014, 04:08 AM
  #7  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Germancar1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 4,846
Received 290 Likes on 203 Posts
2013 650i Coupe, 2010 IS250 AWD, 1999 S500
With the C400 putting out this type of performance, it will be tricky for them to put the C450 in between the C400 and the C63 AMG.

M
Old 09-17-2014, 09:59 AM
  #8  
Super Member
 
DameMD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: GA
Posts: 690
Received 84 Likes on 64 Posts
X3 M40i
Originally Posted by jbbeauso
There is some debate as to how accurately those runs were clocked. The official time posted by MB is 5.2 seconds for 0-100 km/h although that might be a more conservative estimate. I noticed that the idle RPM just before the sport + run is pretty high. I wonder if some sort of launch control technique was used....
That's because they brake torqued the Sport + mode like most mag editors do. Motortrend and Car and driver always does this to get the most out of the 0-60 times. The average driver will not be brake torquing at the light to get 0-60 times so conservatively it would be around 5.0-5.2.

Just an FYI .... MB stated that the outgoing c350 is 5.9 0-60; however, we have also seen motortrend and car & driver get the c350 at 5.4 0-60 and 14.0 quartermile. http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...50_comparison/
I personally ran my car at the local track and ran a 13.879 and all I had was drop in Air Filter and resonator delete.

This still gives us a good idea of how fast the C400 really is. I can't wait until Renntech, Weistec, Kleemann and others get their hands on this car.

Last edited by DameMD; 09-17-2014 at 04:14 PM.
Old 10-24-2014, 04:07 AM
  #9  
Member
 
jyeh74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unfortunately, compared to the 3 series, it still drives like a boat.
Old 10-24-2014, 09:33 AM
  #10  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
c4004matic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: WI
Posts: 4,356
Received 1,098 Likes on 726 Posts
17 E43; 21 GLS580
Originally Posted by jyeh74
Unfortunately, compared to the 3 series, it still drives like a boat.
Stop eating magic mushrooms......
Old 10-24-2014, 09:38 AM
  #11  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
c4004matic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: WI
Posts: 4,356
Received 1,098 Likes on 726 Posts
17 E43; 21 GLS580
Originally Posted by DameMD
That's because they brake torqued the Sport + mode like most mag editors do. Motortrend and Car and driver always does this to get the most out of the 0-60 times. The average driver will not be brake torquing at the light to get 0-60 times so conservatively it would be around 5.0-5.2.

Just an FYI .... MB stated that the outgoing c350 is 5.9 0-60; however, we have also seen motortrend and car & driver get the c350 at 5.4 0-60 and 14.0 quartermile. http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...50_comparison/
I personally ran my car at the local track and ran a 13.879 and all I had was drop in Air Filter and resonator delete.

This still gives us a good idea of how fast the C400 really is. I can't wait until Renntech, Weistec, Kleemann and others get their hands on this car.
A little torque braking helps most cars, but it specially helps turbos the most since it eliminates lag. It is also harmless unless you are doing it all the time.
Old 10-24-2014, 01:11 PM
  #12  
Member
 
bwoodbmw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
E90 335i
Originally Posted by c4004matic
Stop eating magic mushrooms......
coming from a 3 series owner that is likely to purchase a W205 I can tell you it does drive like a bit of a boat compared to the 335... speed wise its just as quick if not quicker, but feel is a world apart.
Old 10-24-2014, 02:24 PM
  #13  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
c4004matic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: WI
Posts: 4,356
Received 1,098 Likes on 726 Posts
17 E43; 21 GLS580
Originally Posted by bwoodbmw
coming from a 3 series owner that is likely to purchase a W205 I can tell you it does drive like a bit of a boat compared to the 335... speed wise its just as quick if not quicker, but feel is a world apart.
Cant wait for the Comparison tests....... The only way the C drives like a boat is if the boat is an America's Cup racer!
http://www.boatdesign.net/forums/att...tnz-3-6-13.jpg


Again, someone is confusing a crustier ride with better performance

Last edited by c4004matic; 10-24-2014 at 03:00 PM.
Old 10-26-2014, 07:36 PM
  #14  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
c4004matic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: WI
Posts: 4,356
Received 1,098 Likes on 726 Posts
17 E43; 21 GLS580
BTW, the Mercedes specification "time slip" is 5.2 according to the specification on the brochure. Of course, as we see here, that can be improved by torque braking quite significantly.

Last edited by c4004matic; 10-26-2014 at 07:47 PM.
Old 10-26-2014, 07:41 PM
  #15  
Out Of Control!!
 
PeterUbers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 11,719
Received 2,040 Likes on 1,422 Posts
2014 E63S; AMS 100 octane ecu tune; edok tcu tune; BB intakes; dyno tuned
There is more to the drive than the 0-60 playas, re: c450. That's why the bimmers are so appealing. Most people on forums seem content enough if their 0-60 is superior to another car...

The c450 will be nice ... More torque across the band, passing power, rolling starts, pulling out if corners, for those that care: better handling

Last edited by PeterUbers; 10-26-2014 at 07:46 PM.
Old 10-26-2014, 07:51 PM
  #16  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
c4004matic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: WI
Posts: 4,356
Received 1,098 Likes on 726 Posts
17 E43; 21 GLS580
Originally Posted by PeterUbers
There is more to the drive than the 0-60 playas, re: c450. That's why the bimmers are so appealing. Most people on forums seem content enough if their 0-60 is superior to another car...

The c450 will be nice ... More torque across the band, passing power, rolling starts, pulling out if corners, for those that care: better handling
And lest we forget an additional 20k. If you want a track car fine. But for the real world I'll keep my 400. Plus it will be RWD only a big drawback for us winter states.
Old 10-26-2014, 08:17 PM
  #17  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Germancar1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 4,846
Received 290 Likes on 203 Posts
2013 650i Coupe, 2010 IS250 AWD, 1999 S500
How do you know the C450 will be RWD only? There has been nothing mentioned about that. If anything it will be RWD with optional AWD since they're tackling the Audi S4 and the upcoming 340i.

M
Old 10-26-2014, 08:28 PM
  #18  
Out Of Control!!
 
PeterUbers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 11,719
Received 2,040 Likes on 1,422 Posts
2014 E63S; AMS 100 octane ecu tune; edok tcu tune; BB intakes; dyno tuned
Originally Posted by c4004matic
And lest we forget an additional 20k. If you want a track car fine. But for the real world I'll keep my 400. Plus it will be RWD only a big drawback for us winter states.
You're right, you gotta pay to play but I'm amazed at the daily driveability of performance Benz/amg cars.... I predict 4matic and a nice daily driver setting in the user menu for the c450
Old 10-26-2014, 08:35 PM
  #19  
Out Of Control!!
 
PeterUbers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 11,719
Received 2,040 Likes on 1,422 Posts
2014 E63S; AMS 100 octane ecu tune; edok tcu tune; BB intakes; dyno tuned
Originally Posted by Germancar1
How do you know the C450 will be RWD only? There has been nothing mentioned about that. If anything it will be RWD with optional AWD since they're tackling the Audi S4 and the upcoming 340i.

M
Agreed, likely 4matic option on c450. Benz exec said no 4matic on new c63/c63S because they want to keep it in a certain price point ... But I can see it in the c450 as the c400 4-matic hardware will likely already support the bump in hp/tq from c400-->c450

Interesting times we live in... Do you guys remember how boring the 90's and very early 2000's were for Benz???
Old 10-26-2014, 10:07 PM
  #20  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
c4004matic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: WI
Posts: 4,356
Received 1,098 Likes on 726 Posts
17 E43; 21 GLS580
Originally Posted by Germancar1
How do you know the C450 will be RWD only? There has been nothing mentioned about that. If anything it will be RWD with optional AWD since they're tackling the Audi S4 and the upcoming 340i.

M


The other engines I had read out for the c series were a 420 and a 503 HP, both RWD. We'll see in a few mths.
personally I don't see the reason for another twinner, given that the next level after the c400 is the M3. A couple of AMGs should cover that and more.

Last edited by c4004matic; 10-26-2014 at 10:11 PM.
Old 10-26-2014, 10:27 PM
  #21  
Out Of Control!!
 
PeterUbers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 11,719
Received 2,040 Likes on 1,422 Posts
2014 E63S; AMS 100 octane ecu tune; edok tcu tune; BB intakes; dyno tuned
Originally Posted by c4004matic
The other engines I had read out for the c series were a 420 and a 503 HP, both RWD. We'll see in a few mths.
personally I don't see the reason for another twinner, given that the next level after the c400 is the M3. A couple of AMGs should cover that and more.
There's this amg-lite market out there ... Like the s-line trim and //M competition packages etc etc and F-trim for lex ... Benz never had that and I think they're just now getting into it... "Amg" logos on non amg's doesn't count.

They'll find a price point for everyone!
Old 10-26-2014, 11:06 PM
  #22  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
c4004matic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: WI
Posts: 4,356
Received 1,098 Likes on 726 Posts
17 E43; 21 GLS580
Originally Posted by PeterUbers
There's this amg-lite market out there ... Like the s-line trim and //M competition packages etc etc and F-trim for lex ... Benz never had that and I think they're just now getting into it... "Amg" logos on non amg's doesn't count.

They'll find a price point for everyone!
There are certainly a million 3 series variations
Old 10-26-2014, 11:19 PM
  #23  
Out Of Control!!
 
PeterUbers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 11,719
Received 2,040 Likes on 1,422 Posts
2014 E63S; AMS 100 octane ecu tune; edok tcu tune; BB intakes; dyno tuned
Originally Posted by c4004matic
There are certainly a million 3 series variations
Lol, yes! I never sat down to buy a bmw and probably never will but it's gotta be a complex process as you said... A million iterations of a 3 series... Which one do you get...which ones do they keep on the lot?? Too complex lol
Old 10-26-2014, 11:56 PM
  #24  
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Germancar1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 4,846
Received 290 Likes on 203 Posts
2013 650i Coupe, 2010 IS250 AWD, 1999 S500
Originally Posted by c4004matic
The other engines I had read out for the c series were a 420 and a 503 HP, both RWD. We'll see in a few mths.
personally I don't see the reason for another twinner, given that the next level after the c400 is the M3. A couple of AMGs should cover that and more.
The C450 is replacing the C400 for the 2016 model year. I also didn't see how they would position a C450 between the C400 and the C63, but they've solved that. C450 replaces the C400. Makes perfect sense to me. You will have the C300 (241hp), C450 (362hp) and the C63 in either 469hp or 503hp guise.

Mercedes is going really match the BMW 3/4-Series car for car this time. Expect a coupe and a convertible with these same engines. A C450 Convertible would be a better car than today's E350/E400 Convertible IMO.

Then we have to address the new I6 engines that are supposed to arrive for the 2017 model year. I would suspect that the model designations won't change, but the hp will. We may even see the C300 replaced by a I6 in low turbo form and the C250 re-introduced to the U.S. market with power similar to or more than the current C300. All just my speculation.

M
Old 10-26-2014, 11:58 PM
  #25  
Senior Member
 
AMG Boost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2010 C63 P30
Originally Posted by alihou007
C63 0-60 times are anywhere between 3.6 to 4.3 depending on the MY.

C400 is no slouch but not in the same league as the C63...


Agreed this is not in the same league as next gen C63. However the fact this is a 4Matic it will have a huge advantage in wet, cold, or snowy conditions if the two were to have a race from a dig. Just saying. Not to mention altitude losses factored in for the 6.3L M156.

This C400 is decent!


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: C400 0-60 times, 4.6 seconds? wow



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:28 PM.