Wall Street Journal reviews the CLS63
07-30-2011, 11:42 AM
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Wall Street Journal reviews the CLS63
Dan Neil's written review, plus links to a slide show (no new ground broken there), and to a video, wherein Dan provides the two anchors in the studio a summary of his article:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...126831348.html
A generally positive review, reaching for strained metaphors as they all seem to do. But then, this car tends to make one look for new figures of speech; plain old English sometimes seems inadequate.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...126831348.html
A generally positive review, reaching for strained metaphors as they all seem to do. But then, this car tends to make one look for new figures of speech; plain old English sometimes seems inadequate.
08-01-2011, 10:42 AM
#3
Member
I like this quote from the article..
To save you an email: Which one do I like better, this car or the Porsche Panamera Turbo? The Porsche is the better-handling car but, with all respect, compared with the CLS63 AMG the Panamera Turbo looks like a fat guy in a Tommy Bahama shirt.
To save you an email: Which one do I like better, this car or the Porsche Panamera Turbo? The Porsche is the better-handling car but, with all respect, compared with the CLS63 AMG the Panamera Turbo looks like a fat guy in a Tommy Bahama shirt.
