CLS 63 PP vs Panamera Turbo S
This new CLS is just damn impressive. Time to off load the C63.
http://www.germancarforum.com/intern...63-amg-pp.html
Ken
This new CLS is just damn impressive. Time to off load the C63.
http://www.germancarforum.com/intern...63-amg-pp.html
Ken
Last edited by Gsc; Aug 25, 2011 at 11:23 PM. Reason: spelling
That's a significant difference.
I know AWD can help lay the power down, but I didn't think it would do it by THAT much.
Also, there's a couple of critics (I think R&D is one of them??) who have clocked the CLS63 w/ PP doing 3.9sec. But I think that was 0-60mph.
Anyway, you can't go wrong with either car.
Having to choose between a Porsche Panamera Turbo or a CLS63TT AMG is a good problem to have.
Trending Topics
The Best of Mercedes & AMG
That's a significant difference.
I know AWD can help lay the power down, but I didn't think it would do it by THAT much.
Also, there's a couple of critics (I think R&D is one of them??) who have clocked the CLS63 w/ PP doing 3.9sec. But I think that was 0-60mph.
Anyway, you can't go wrong with either car.
Having to choose between a Porsche Panamera Turbo or a CLS63TT AMG is a good problem to have.

And good post - thanks for the review. My new CLS 63 w/ PP is sitting in Baltimore, about to be hit by Irene. FML.







