CLS Stage 2 vs M6 Stage 2
#2
I just got an automated email from MHPs site with this same vid lol. Looks like the CLS has a definitive advantage. I hear they will be out again next Thursday evening. Look for more races next week. Oh yeah tuner of the M6 claims it won...?
#3
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Naples FL
Posts: 2,925
Received 167 Likes
on
133 Posts
2021 Porsche TTS
Thanks for sharing.
Looks like about even runs with CLS gaining most of the time time at higher speeds. Sounds about right for 2 large sedans with similar weight and hp.
Would like to know if the M had a disadvantage with an extra passenger in the car.
Interesting that the M started racing at like 5K rpm on every pull. Shows how efficient the DCT is in this car.
The CLS does not have to be that high as I believe it has higher torque number lower.
Looks like about even runs with CLS gaining most of the time time at higher speeds. Sounds about right for 2 large sedans with similar weight and hp.
Would like to know if the M had a disadvantage with an extra passenger in the car.
Interesting that the M started racing at like 5K rpm on every pull. Shows how efficient the DCT is in this car.
The CLS does not have to be that high as I believe it has higher torque number lower.
#4
Administrator
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: THE Orange County, California
Posts: 11,921
Received 796 Likes
on
495 Posts
2020 Audi R8 V10, 2016 AMG GTS, 2018 E63S Edition 1, 2018 Porsche GTS Cab, 2012 C63 BS
Good runs---- the M157 engine is definitely more tunable. The F chassis ECU's are not even broken yet so the tunes are all piggy back in nature (resistor) or the ultra conservative OBDII tune called the Press Release tune.
Once true tuning occurs with the S63tu engine- Id like to see gains equivalent to what the the tunes of the M157's have been showing.
Once true tuning occurs with the S63tu engine- Id like to see gains equivalent to what the the tunes of the M157's have been showing.
#6
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Southern Cali (Ontario)
Posts: 3,466
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes
on
10 Posts
dyno runs on stock M5
seems like M5's don't like Dynos
but at the same time.. the more races I see of the F10/12.. it increases my doubts about the cooling system on the car and the turbos placed inside the V8 valley.
seems like M5's don't like Dynos
but at the same time.. the more races I see of the F10/12.. it increases my doubts about the cooling system on the car and the turbos placed inside the V8 valley.
#7
dyno runs on stock M5
seems like M5's don't like Dynos
but at the same time.. the more races I see of the F10/12.. it increases my doubts about the cooling system on the car and the turbos placed inside the V8 valley.
Evolve BMW F10 M5 dyno testing stock car for consistency - YouTube
seems like M5's don't like Dynos
but at the same time.. the more races I see of the F10/12.. it increases my doubts about the cooling system on the car and the turbos placed inside the V8 valley.
Evolve BMW F10 M5 dyno testing stock car for consistency - YouTube
Trending Topics
#9
The M5 F10 intercoolers core are 50% larger than the M157 engine, plus don't forget that the M157 intercoolers are placed in the V section which is also not the best place being surrounded by the engine heat, to my opinion the M157 advantage is the engine displacement 5.5L versus 4.0L
Good info on the F10 intercoolers. Makes sense, BMW has the sense to overengineer for these things where it seems AMG doesnt.
For what its worth NA ultimate HP is determined by displacement and rpm. With forced induction its about how large the head unit of the turbo, turbos or supercharger is.
So I guess the ultimate question is, is there more room in the Vee of the F10 & F12 or on the sides of the M157?
Im a fan of conventional port routing and turbo mounting as it seems the turbos would be more limited in the vee and they have to be putting some serious heat into the block??? But the M177 is done the same way and audi's 4.0l runs strong with this system so i'm sure it's the future of tt vee engines.
#10
Good info on the F10 intercoolers. Makes sense, BMW has the sense to overengineer for these things where it seems AMG doesnt.
For what its worth NA ultimate HP is determined by displacement and rpm. With forced induction its about how large the head unit of the turbo, turbos or supercharger is.
So I guess the ultimate question is, is there more room in the Vee of the F10 & F12 or on the sides of the M157?
Im a fan of conventional port routing and turbo mounting as it seems the turbos would be more limited in the vee and they have to be putting some serious heat into the block??? But the M177 is done the same way and audi's 4.0l runs strong with this system so i'm sure it's the future of tt vee engines.
For what its worth NA ultimate HP is determined by displacement and rpm. With forced induction its about how large the head unit of the turbo, turbos or supercharger is.
So I guess the ultimate question is, is there more room in the Vee of the F10 & F12 or on the sides of the M157?
Im a fan of conventional port routing and turbo mounting as it seems the turbos would be more limited in the vee and they have to be putting some serious heat into the block??? But the M177 is done the same way and audi's 4.0l runs strong with this system so i'm sure it's the future of tt vee engines.
#11
Administrator
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: THE Orange County, California
Posts: 11,921
Received 796 Likes
on
495 Posts
2020 Audi R8 V10, 2016 AMG GTS, 2018 E63S Edition 1, 2018 Porsche GTS Cab, 2012 C63 BS
dyno runs on stock M5
seems like M5's don't like Dynos
but at the same time.. the more races I see of the F10/12.. it increases my doubts about the cooling system on the car and the turbos placed inside the V8 valley.
Evolve BMW F10 M5 dyno testing stock car for consistency - YouTube
seems like M5's don't like Dynos
but at the same time.. the more races I see of the F10/12.. it increases my doubts about the cooling system on the car and the turbos placed inside the V8 valley.
Evolve BMW F10 M5 dyno testing stock car for consistency - YouTube
Oh I dont see a 500 whp m5 as being bad do you? What do stock M157's run, pp and no pp... and does anyone have their runs on the same dyno? I do... a member here (Vdub e63 pp car, my m5, my c63 black)
Its still not absolutely ideal but its the same dyno and conditions were close- very close
#16
actually we dont. what we do know is the m5 gets destroyed against tuned biturbo.
stock for stock Ive seen m5 win and ive also seen amg cls/E win. Ive even seen 13 c63 beat the m5 plenty of times.
stock for stock Ive seen m5 win and ive also seen amg cls/E win. Ive even seen 13 c63 beat the m5 plenty of times.
#18
Administrator
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: THE Orange County, California
Posts: 11,921
Received 796 Likes
on
495 Posts
2020 Audi R8 V10, 2016 AMG GTS, 2018 E63S Edition 1, 2018 Porsche GTS Cab, 2012 C63 BS
Well I have tangible personal experience- not some youtube vids of others... stock vs stock M5 vs CLS63 (oh did I mention I have and own them both)... As for tuned, we can always throw that in and say the M157 will win (had 2 of them) but the M5 has not yet been cracked- still waiting for someone to truly get into the matrix of that ECU.
But yes its a drivers race- the power bands and hp are close enough up top that he/she who gets the jump should be able to hold on.
But yes its a drivers race- the power bands and hp are close enough up top that he/she who gets the jump should be able to hold on.
#19
MBWorld Fanatic!
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Naples FL
Posts: 2,925
Received 167 Likes
on
133 Posts
2021 Porsche TTS
Thanks for being fair .
There is a substantial difference with the PP package versus regular CLS
Just went to the drag strip last friday (my first time ever) and I was able to post better times than tuned C63 and C63BS.
Was real happy for a noob to post 12.2 at 118.8 on a very humid FL night.
Now those pesky GTRs run some crazy numbers but that is a different subject.
There is a substantial difference with the PP package versus regular CLS
Just went to the drag strip last friday (my first time ever) and I was able to post better times than tuned C63 and C63BS.
Was real happy for a noob to post 12.2 at 118.8 on a very humid FL night.
Now those pesky GTRs run some crazy numbers but that is a different subject.
#20
MBWorld Fanatic!
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Southern Cali (Ontario)
Posts: 3,466
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes
on
10 Posts
[QUOTE=Vic55;5729013]This is one dyno---- do more searches---- and who cares about a dyno LOL
Oh I dont see a 500 whp m5 as being bad do you? What do stock M157's run, pp and no pp... and does anyone have their runs on the same dyno? I do... a member here (Vdub e63 pp car, my m5, my c63 black)
Its still not absolutely ideal but its the same dyno and conditions were close- very close
QUOTE]
Not all bad dyno.. just pointing out this is sample #2 showing M5 with dyno disparity in each run.
You can agree before a E63 M6 needed 450RWHP to beat badly a 525RWHP+ E55.. due to the SMG3 super gearing. For a lightly tuned m6.. with not cats and light version of tune should dyno 560RWHP+ should run close to a 620RWHP+ CLS63. But that is not the case.
We now the M6 is faster than M5 and we know the DCT is superior to just about any transmission out there.. yet the results are not clear compared to the E60/E63 days.
You can agree that advantage is gone.
IMHO: Something is up with the cooling on the F10/12,whether is the turbos in the V or the intercooler set up.. cuz slightly tuned it should be tearing up top end from just about anything.
Oh I dont see a 500 whp m5 as being bad do you? What do stock M157's run, pp and no pp... and does anyone have their runs on the same dyno? I do... a member here (Vdub e63 pp car, my m5, my c63 black)
Its still not absolutely ideal but its the same dyno and conditions were close- very close
QUOTE]
Not all bad dyno.. just pointing out this is sample #2 showing M5 with dyno disparity in each run.
You can agree before a E63 M6 needed 450RWHP to beat badly a 525RWHP+ E55.. due to the SMG3 super gearing. For a lightly tuned m6.. with not cats and light version of tune should dyno 560RWHP+ should run close to a 620RWHP+ CLS63. But that is not the case.
We now the M6 is faster than M5 and we know the DCT is superior to just about any transmission out there.. yet the results are not clear compared to the E60/E63 days.
You can agree that advantage is gone.
IMHO: Something is up with the cooling on the F10/12,whether is the turbos in the V or the intercooler set up.. cuz slightly tuned it should be tearing up top end from just about anything.
#21
Administrator
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: THE Orange County, California
Posts: 11,921
Received 796 Likes
on
495 Posts
2020 Audi R8 V10, 2016 AMG GTS, 2018 E63S Edition 1, 2018 Porsche GTS Cab, 2012 C63 BS
[QUOTE=TopGun32;5731497]
apples and oranges--- you are comparing a sequential manaul gearbox with limited parasitic loss (E63 M6) to an E55 with a slushbox 5 speed manual that can not efficiently put down the power VS. a heavier F13 M6 vs a planetarly automatic (mct) with better efficiencies in power (CLS63TT). Two different times in the lives of M vs AMG my friend.
I never thought there was an advantage LOL - and guess what I have owned every single car mentioned and all were modded. Dynos are a measuring stick and not the street: My E55 with 485 "dyno" hp was faster than My E63 M6- with full exhaust, pulley, ecu.... even from a run all the way to 160 plus.
My tuned CLS63 would walk a stock F13 M6 but would have a tougher time beating a resistor box tuned F13 M6..... My post above was to show that the stock vs stock the F10/13 cars are very strong vs the CLS63TT stock and this is my factual ownership experience of having all 3 cars (M5, M6, CLS) and I even had an E63TT wagon.
Im not sure what the point is here- the vids didnt show me a whole lot except that a resistor tune on a F10 chassis can make it fast but a real tune like the M157 has would benefit the F10 that much more. Was it even a resistor tune or a press release tune for that matter... Check it out on the boards the press tune is a limited safe gain tune created from the factory. Yes it makes the car faster but no where near what the CLS gets.
My point is that there is no "real" tune for the f10 series chassis yet- and my dynos came off a higher reading dyno no doubt. I take with a grain of salt for this reason the claimed "700" hp on the M6 which is probably resistor tune piggy backed with a press box tune LOL. Oh did anyone even notice the M6 driving in D mode the whole time- huge mistake in a rolling race. Trust me I know, I have the cars- did I mention that LOL
This is one dyno---- do more searches---- and who cares about a dyno LOL
Oh I dont see a 500 whp m5 as being bad do you? What do stock M157's run, pp and no pp... and does anyone have their runs on the same dyno? I do... a member here (Vdub e63 pp car, my m5, my c63 black)
Its still not absolutely ideal but its the same dyno and conditions were close- very close
QUOTE]
Not all bad dyno.. just pointing out this is sample #2 showing M5 with dyno disparity in each run.
You can agree before a E63 M6 needed 450RWHP to beat badly a 525RWHP+ E55.. due to the SMG3 super gearing. For a lightly tuned m6.. with not cats and light version of tune should dyno 560RWHP+ should run close to a 620RWHP+ CLS63. But that is not the case.
We now the M6 is faster than M5 and we know the DCT is superior to just about any transmission out there.. yet the results are not clear compared to the E60/E63 days.
You can agree that advantage is gone.
IMHO: Something is up with the cooling on the F10/12,whether is the turbos in the V or the intercooler set up.. cuz slightly tuned it should be tearing up top end from just about anything.
Oh I dont see a 500 whp m5 as being bad do you? What do stock M157's run, pp and no pp... and does anyone have their runs on the same dyno? I do... a member here (Vdub e63 pp car, my m5, my c63 black)
Its still not absolutely ideal but its the same dyno and conditions were close- very close
QUOTE]
Not all bad dyno.. just pointing out this is sample #2 showing M5 with dyno disparity in each run.
You can agree before a E63 M6 needed 450RWHP to beat badly a 525RWHP+ E55.. due to the SMG3 super gearing. For a lightly tuned m6.. with not cats and light version of tune should dyno 560RWHP+ should run close to a 620RWHP+ CLS63. But that is not the case.
We now the M6 is faster than M5 and we know the DCT is superior to just about any transmission out there.. yet the results are not clear compared to the E60/E63 days.
You can agree that advantage is gone.
IMHO: Something is up with the cooling on the F10/12,whether is the turbos in the V or the intercooler set up.. cuz slightly tuned it should be tearing up top end from just about anything.
I never thought there was an advantage LOL - and guess what I have owned every single car mentioned and all were modded. Dynos are a measuring stick and not the street: My E55 with 485 "dyno" hp was faster than My E63 M6- with full exhaust, pulley, ecu.... even from a run all the way to 160 plus.
My tuned CLS63 would walk a stock F13 M6 but would have a tougher time beating a resistor box tuned F13 M6..... My post above was to show that the stock vs stock the F10/13 cars are very strong vs the CLS63TT stock and this is my factual ownership experience of having all 3 cars (M5, M6, CLS) and I even had an E63TT wagon.
Im not sure what the point is here- the vids didnt show me a whole lot except that a resistor tune on a F10 chassis can make it fast but a real tune like the M157 has would benefit the F10 that much more. Was it even a resistor tune or a press release tune for that matter... Check it out on the boards the press tune is a limited safe gain tune created from the factory. Yes it makes the car faster but no where near what the CLS gets.
My point is that there is no "real" tune for the f10 series chassis yet- and my dynos came off a higher reading dyno no doubt. I take with a grain of salt for this reason the claimed "700" hp on the M6 which is probably resistor tune piggy backed with a press box tune LOL. Oh did anyone even notice the M6 driving in D mode the whole time- huge mistake in a rolling race. Trust me I know, I have the cars- did I mention that LOL
Last edited by Vic55; 07-30-2013 at 03:06 PM.
#22
The only reason they are placing the turbos in the V is better emissions and innovation comes for leading in emission issues there is no room in the M157 it's a tight fit, and the F10/F12 aren't being upgraded from that side of the tuning due to space! The problem in the M177 is not going to be the hardware but the ECU it will be a while before cracking the codes! The A45 haven't been cracked yet and it seems it will take a while! People are excited with the E63S but let's see how long it takes to tune them those new ECU's will be no joke
I dont disagree with the ecu's being the issue in the future. Ill switch back to domestic muscle if the M177 is unhackable. I'll give the CLA45 a few mos stock before I dump it if I cant tune it.
#23
Well I have tangible personal experience- not some youtube vids of others... stock vs stock M5 vs CLS63 (oh did I mention I have and own them both)... As for tuned, we can always throw that in and say the M157 will win (had 2 of them) but the M5 has not yet been cracked- still waiting for someone to truly get into the matrix of that ECU.
But yes its a drivers race- the power bands and hp are close enough up top that he/she who gets the jump should be able to hold on.
But yes its a drivers race- the power bands and hp are close enough up top that he/she who gets the jump should be able to hold on.
Also how can you tell the cars are not in manual mode? Please enlighten a non M5 M6 owner.
Thanks
#24
Administrator
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: THE Orange County, California
Posts: 11,921
Received 796 Likes
on
495 Posts
2020 Audi R8 V10, 2016 AMG GTS, 2018 E63S Edition 1, 2018 Porsche GTS Cab, 2012 C63 BS
I paused the video and in the center of the dash (between the speedo and tach) is the D (drive or auto mode) which was clearly visable. If he was manually shifting you would just see the gear he was in- ala 2, 3, 4, etc. I think the only time he ran manual was the first race which was stopped short by traffic. Running D mode is fast but its not as fast as running manual mode and shifting on your own---
#25
I paused the video and in the center of the dash (between the speedo and tach) is the D (drive or auto mode) which was clearly visable. If he was manually shifting you would just see the gear he was in- ala 2, 3, 4, etc. I think the only time he ran manual was the first race which was stopped short by traffic. Running D mode is fast but its not as fast as running manual mode and shifting on your own---
Makes me wonder why during a race anyone would switch from a faster shift to a slower one lol?
again thanks.