C219 CLS55 and CLS63, 2004-2010

Lowering the car

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old May 20, 2006 | 11:59 AM
  #1  
Heisenberg's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 785
Likes: 113
From: Scottsdale, Arizona
2020 S63 Coupe, 2006 Hummer H1 Alpha, 2018 McLaren 720S, 2022 Porsche 911 TurboS, 2022 Tesla Model X
Lowering the car -- the cheap way!

I decided to give the washer / bracket modification a try. I have more work to do but it is working!

Up front I have added three 6mm metric washers between the bracket holding the control rod and the frame, creating a spacer of about 4mm. I replaced the nut with a 6mm metric lock nut that does not have the bottom flange, so there is plenty of thread to tighten securely. I could safely add one more washer which would give me about a 5.3mm spacer.

In the rear I removed the nuts on the screws securing the bracket and dremeled a notch from the existing holes (using a tungsten carbide cutter) about 3mm towards the ground. This was basically out to the ring visible around the hole when the nut is removed. The bracket was relocated to the new position, a little closer to the ground and to the rear of the car, and the nuts were replaced.

Measured from the ground to the top of the fender well, the rear is now at 26.375" and the front is at 26.125". This is about 0.375" lower in the back and 0.5" lower in the front. Before and after measurements were obtained in the Sports II mode.

I'm going to add another washer up front and dremel the rear holes another 1mm or so. Crappy pic of the rear is attached, will get some better shots today. Car is camera shy right now because it is dirty and new tires need glaze !

If anyone wants the exact part numbers for the washers and nuts I used (both were perfect fits, and purchased from Home Depot) just ask, same for the dremel bit which seems indestructible even through some very hard steel ...
Attached Thumbnails Lowering the car-p5204325.jpg  

Last edited by Heisenberg; May 20, 2006 at 08:08 PM.
Reply
Old May 20, 2006 | 12:02 PM
  #2  
Heisenberg's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 785
Likes: 113
From: Scottsdale, Arizona
2020 S63 Coupe, 2006 Hummer H1 Alpha, 2018 McLaren 720S, 2022 Porsche 911 TurboS, 2022 Tesla Model X
This isn't my picture but I added annotation for bearings and does show how I notched the holes. I stopped at the ring around each existing hole so my current displacement is less than half of what this owner (E500 I believe) did. Tonight I will expand the notches a bit more.
Attached Thumbnails Lowering the car-slotted-holes-copy.jpg  
Reply
Old May 21, 2006 | 04:25 AM
  #3  
Heisenberg's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 785
Likes: 113
From: Scottsdale, Arizona
2020 S63 Coupe, 2006 Hummer H1 Alpha, 2018 McLaren 720S, 2022 Porsche 911 TurboS, 2022 Tesla Model X
My pictures... after a bit more lowering. Car now down to 26" front and 26.125" rear. I had the front below 26" but dropping the rear raised it back up a bit.

Washers (stack of four, three steel and one steel/zinc) in the front total 5.33 mm. I'm using a 6mm tension nut instead of the MBZ nut, as it lacks the flange on the bottom and thus has more available tread. The bracket is fastened very securely but I still may add some Loctite to it. Any more washers would definitely require a longer bracket.
Attached Thumbnails Lowering the car-img_3795a.jpg   Lowering the car-img_3797a.jpg  

Last edited by Heisenberg; May 21, 2006 at 04:30 AM.
Reply
Old May 21, 2006 | 06:50 AM
  #4  
rbc55's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
From: orlando,fl.
2005 e55
Originally Posted by ekovalsky
I decided to give the washer / bracket modification a try. I have more work to do but it is working!

Up front I have added three 6mm metric washers between the bracket holding the control rod and the frame, creating a spacer of about 4mm. I replaced the nut with a 6mm metric lock nut that does not have the bottom flange, so there is plenty of thread to tighten securely. I could safely add one more washer which would give me about a 5.3mm spacer.

In the rear I removed the nuts on the screws securing the bracket and dremeled a notch from the existing holes (using a tungsten carbide cutter) about 3mm towards the ground. This was basically out to the ring visible around the hole when the nut is removed. The bracket was relocated to the new position, a little closer to the ground and to the rear of the car, and the nuts were replaced.

Measured from the ground to the top of the fender well, the rear is now at 26.375" and the front is at 26.125". This is about 0.375" lower in the back and 0.5" lower in the front. Before and after measurements were obtained in the Sports II mode.

I'm going to add another washer up front and dremel the rear holes another 1mm or so. Crappy pic of the rear is attached, will get some better shots today. Car is camera shy right now because it is dirty and new tires need glaze !

If anyone wants the exact part numbers for the washers and nuts I used (both were perfect fits, and purchased from Home Depot) just ask, same for the dremel bit which seems indestructible even through some very hard steel ...
i'm surprised that some people will actually go this route to lower their cars,there is no question that it works; however,having it done properly with a module or through star diagnostics would be costlier but only fractional to the cost of the vehicle and less chance of issues with this method as well as issues with the dealer if a problem were to occur.
Reply
Old May 21, 2006 | 11:33 AM
  #5  
Dogshine's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 958
Likes: 0
CLS55
This way should create no more problems than any other way of lowering, and in reality, retains the same functionality of the stock suspension. If you change it electronically with a module, the potential for problems is much greater imo.
Reply
Old May 21, 2006 | 11:54 AM
  #6  
Heisenberg's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 785
Likes: 113
From: Scottsdale, Arizona
2020 S63 Coupe, 2006 Hummer H1 Alpha, 2018 McLaren 720S, 2022 Porsche 911 TurboS, 2022 Tesla Model X
Originally Posted by Dogshine
This way should create no more problems than any other way of lowering, and in reality, retains the same functionality of the stock suspension. If you change it electronically with a module, the potential for problems is much greater imo.
I agree. I had more concerns about an electronics module or reprogramming the car computer. As long as it is done properly / safely, there should be fewer issues with a mechanical solution like this or replacement links or control arms.
Reply
Old May 21, 2006 | 01:52 PM
  #7  
newton22's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,574
Likes: 3
From: Sugar Land, TX
BMW E39
I agree, I went through the same method. Works like a charm.

However, for the rear, there is a single sensor. Just adjust that to lower the car.
Reply
Old May 22, 2006 | 02:03 AM
  #8  
Heisenberg's Avatar
Thread Starter
Super Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 785
Likes: 113
From: Scottsdale, Arizona
2020 S63 Coupe, 2006 Hummer H1 Alpha, 2018 McLaren 720S, 2022 Porsche 911 TurboS, 2022 Tesla Model X
Originally Posted by newton22
I agree, I went through the same method. Works like a charm.

However, for the rear, there is a single sensor. Just adjust that to lower the car.
Exactly, a single sensor attached to an aluminum bracket in turn anchored by two screws to a steel support.

Unless extreme lowering is desired, or there is a requirement for dial-in adjustments, I don't really see a reason to use a module. While I had the money for a module, why spend the scratch if I don't have to ? That said, if Star Diagnostics lowering were available where I live I probably would have paid the $250 or whatever for that, just so I wouldn't have had to do the work myself as my time is valuable.
Reply
MB World Stories

The Best of Mercedes & AMG

story-0

Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

 Verdad Gallardo
story-2

Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know

 Verdad Gallardo
story-5

5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

Mercedes Teases Updated EQS With Steer-By-Wire and a Yoke

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

8 Mercedes Models With Poor Reliability Records

 Verdad Gallardo
Old May 22, 2006 | 10:19 AM
  #9  
Dogshine's Avatar
Super Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 958
Likes: 0
CLS55
how much time would it take you to switch it back?
Reply
Old May 22, 2006 | 12:15 PM
  #10  
BMWEATR's Avatar
MBWorld Fanatic!
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,671
Likes: 0
From: strip bar in Oregon
211 E55(sold) & 80cc shifter kart
should take like 20 min to change back to stock.
Reply

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:53 PM.

story-0
Mercedes SLR McLaren 722 S Is Extremely Rare Example Modified by McLaren

Slideshow: A one-of-one U.S.-spec Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren Roadster became even rarer after a factory-backed transformation at McLaren's headquarters.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-29 11:19:28


VIEW MORE
story-1
8 Classic Boxy Mercedes Designs That Have Aged Like Fine Wine

Slideshow: Before curves took over, Mercedes mastered the art of the straight line, and some of those shapes still look right today.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-25 12:05:49


VIEW MORE
story-2
Flawlessly Restored Mercedes 190E Evo II Heads to Auction

Slideshow: The 190E Evolution II shows how a homologation necessity became a six-figure collector icon.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-22 17:53:47


VIEW MORE
story-3
Electric Mercedes C-Class Unveiled: 11 Things You Need to Know

Slideshow: Mercedes is turning one of its core nameplates electric, and the details show just how serious this shift is.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-21 13:58:06


VIEW MORE
story-4
Mercedes EQS Gets A Major Update: Everything You Need to Know

Slideshow: Faster charging, longer range, and a controversial steer-by-wire system define the latest evolution of Mercedes-Benz EQS.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-15 10:35:34


VIEW MORE
story-5
5 Underrated Mercedes-Benz Models That Don't Get the Love They Deserve

Slideshow: These overlooked Mercedes-Benz models never got the spotlight, but they quietly delivered more than most remember.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-13 19:35:45


VIEW MORE
story-6
Mercedes 300D Has Pushed Well Past 1 Million Miles and It Ain't Stopping

Slideshow: A well-used 1991 Mercedes-Benz 300D with more than one million miles is now looking for a new owner, and it still appears ready for more.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-10 10:05:15


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Reliable Mercedes-Benz Models You Can Buy Used

Slideshow: From bulletproof sedans to surprisingly tough SUVs, these Mercedes models proved that the three-pointed star can go the distance.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-08 09:55:49


VIEW MORE
story-8
Mercedes Teases Updated EQS With Steer-By-Wire and a Yoke

Slideshow: The 2027 update adds a fully digital steering system, revised styling, and potential charging upgrades as the company looks to revive interest in the luxury EV.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-04 10:24:38


VIEW MORE
story-9
8 Mercedes Models With Poor Reliability Records

Slideshow: From problematic air suspensions to early dual-clutch transmission issues, these specific models and years stand out as the least dependable modern Mercedes vehicles.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-03-26 18:08:10


VIEW MORE