2010 RRS Supercharge or 2010 BMW X6
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2006 CLS55 AMG; 2006 Infiniti FX45;
![Question](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/icons/icon5.gif)
I'm considering these two SUV's for our FX45 lease replacement. Have you guys seen the performance of the new 2010 Range Rover sport supercharged?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=38N4QOgzZ74
Would like to receive some feedback and opinions of these two choices. My only concern with RR is the history of reliability. THX guys
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=38N4QOgzZ74
Would like to receive some feedback and opinions of these two choices. My only concern with RR is the history of reliability. THX guys
Last edited by von32897; 08-27-2009 at 01:26 PM.
#2
Super Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 736
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Velvet Fleetwood
i'm dealing with the same dilemma. I went to test drive the other day regular RR Sport. I was impressed with low end torque, both engines (standard and supercharged) got significant increase in hp's. the new look is growing on me. interior is well refined, navi is good and the partial digital gauges are equally impressive. one of my major complaints is that the official Land Rover Range Rover USA website is outdated. they are still showing '09 models, when you go to select/build options. dealers are scheduled to receive supercharged RR's at the end of Sept. in terms of complaints regarding the actual RR's, for every one complaint there are thousands satisfied RR drivers (at least that's what I was told). After doing more research I would go with RR over X5 - that's just me. my other dilemma is picking color - black or white??? what would you guys go with? here's the pic of the one i test drove.
#3
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Werkendam, Holland, Europe.
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1999 Coupé Fiat 1.8 16v
I'd prefer a '10 RRS! Fast and classy. The X6 is only fast, and buttugly. Maybe a '10 Discovery as a more cheap (but still classy) option instead of a RRS. And what do you think about the new FX50?
Last edited by AMG Powerrr; 08-27-2009 at 04:01 PM.
#4
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2006 CLS55 AMG; 2006 Infiniti FX45;
i'm dealing with the same dilemma. I went to test drive the other day regular RR Sport. I was impressed with low end torque, both engines (standard and supercharged) got significant increase in hp's. the new look is growing on me. interior is well refined, navi is good and the partial digital gauges are equally impressive. one of my major complaints is that the official Land Rover Range Rover USA website is outdated. they are still showing '09 models, when you go to select/build options. dealers are scheduled to receive supercharged RR's at the end of Sept. in terms of complaints regarding the actual RR's, for every one complaint there are thousands satisfied RR drivers (at least that's what I was told). After doing more research I would go with RR over X5 - that's just me. my other dilemma is picking color - black or white??? what would you guys go with? here's the pic of the one i test drove.
![](https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=d875538bc0&view=att&th=1235d53d83e9a4dc&attid=0.1&disp=thd&zw)
You're picture didn't show up on the site. Maybe something wrong with on my end. I'm also looking at either BLK or White. You're right, their website sucks.
AMG Powerrr,
I've had the FX45 for a while and I just want something different. Besides, I'm not a fan of the new redesign FX.
#6
Super Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 736
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Velvet Fleetwood
VB26,
You're picture didn't show up on the site. Maybe something wrong with on my end. I'm also looking at either BLK or White. You're right, their website sucks.
AMG Powerrr,
I've had the FX45 for a while and I just want something different. Besides, I'm not a fan of the new redesign FX.
You're picture didn't show up on the site. Maybe something wrong with on my end. I'm also looking at either BLK or White. You're right, their website sucks.
AMG Powerrr,
I've had the FX45 for a while and I just want something different. Besides, I'm not a fan of the new redesign FX.
Trending Topics
#8
Super Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Manhattan
Posts: 736
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Velvet Fleetwood
release date is unclear, I think '11. also ran across some numbers for X6 -serious power plant,,, it would give RRSS along with bunch of others a good thrashing. But for almost $90,000 not sure if I would want to buy an X6. I'm not looking to track my suv, just in search for a little umph ![Big Grin](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
twin turbo 4.4 V8
555hp @5,750rpm
501 pound-feet
0-60 = 4.7sec
![Big Grin](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
twin turbo 4.4 V8
555hp @5,750rpm
501 pound-feet
0-60 = 4.7sec
#9
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2006 CLS55 AMG; 2006 Infiniti FX45;
release date is unclear, I think '11. also ran across some numbers for X6 -serious power plant,,, it would give RRSS along with bunch of others a good thrashing. But for almost $90,000 not sure if I would want to buy an X6. I'm not looking to track my suv, just in search for a little umph ![Big Grin](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
twin turbo 4.4 V8
555hp @5,750rpm
501 pound-feet
0-60 = 4.7sec
![Big Grin](https://mbworld.org/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
twin turbo 4.4 V8
555hp @5,750rpm
501 pound-feet
0-60 = 4.7sec
Last edited by von32897; 08-28-2009 at 01:37 PM.